Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
no, that is not what is being expressed. view above may be your view, but it is not what the earlier post was saying.
No, it was leaning pretty hard into the No True Scotsman fallacy. And then, in an attempt to retreat from that fallacy, atheism was declared not only to be a religion, but the most harmful religion of them all.
Um, that is a post from 2016. What you noted was nonsense on your end. I thought the poster you responded to was quite proper and unassuming and you just ripped him a new one. I do see the uncanny resemblance to that other post but it doesn't mean it is any less true. We steal things and use them as our own, you are definitely guilty of that too, Godie.
You know Godie, if you put as much effort into a proper post without an agenda as you do digging up old posts then we would have something to talk about. You and that other poster who has mysteriously been MIA, you both do this. Digging up, digging up, digging up Holes.
You know Godie, if you put as much effort into a proper post without an agenda as you do digging up old posts then we would have something to talk about. You and that other poster who has mysteriously been MIA, you both do this. Digging up, digging up, digging up Holes.
I really like you Godie, why you got to be so ornery?
And what would the difference be in stating the same wise-guy bogus analogy that has been proffered a jillion times before?
I am noting THEIR repetition.
But you seem to have missed that aspect of it.
Funny you didn't say to them..."if you put as much effort into a proper post without an agenda as you do using old wise-guy analogies then we would have something to talk about. Repeating, repeating, repeating old memes."
I'm not ornery...I call out ornery.
I like you too.
And what would the difference be in stating the same wise-guy bogus analogy that has been proffered a jillion times before?
I am noting THEIR repetition.
But you seem to have missed that aspect of it.
Funny you didn't say to them..."if you put as much effort into a proper post without an agenda as you do using old wise-guy analogies then we would have something to talk about. Repeating, repeating, repeating old memes."
I'm not ornery...I call out ornery.
I like you too.
The creation is proof. Or if one possibly thinks a big bang occurred where as trillions x trillions x trillions of atoms shot out in utter confusion yet all landed perfectly to create all of the harmony of creation, they are sadly mistaken to believe that.
Yet your perfect god just existed. Oh, wait, you have just argued that is unlikely.
I believe it’s a weak attempt at invoking the No True Scotsman fallacy.
No, it is the non sequitur and the cüm hoc ergo propter hocfallacy that puts religion above philosophy, science, mathematics, logic, etc.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
