Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Lauren Bobert seems to be a Republican candidate and business woman. So she has an opinion. Sexual activities are personal, we dont live in a theocracy that dictates who can have sex, when, and how, or defines morality. We only have legal or illegal. Everything else is subjective judgement.
It is uncanny how quickly atheists start talking like fundamental Christians and want to take us back to the middle age theocracy regarding women's sexuality and abortion, the last of which is against rules of this forum.
They are never far from their religious text - the Bible.
It is not strange that your straw man and deflection does not address the point. You had to twist the argument so much, one must ask why you fear atheists for simply not believing dubious claims. is it because you know all your claims ARE dubious?
It is not strange that your straw man and deflection does not address the point. You had to twist the argument so much, one must ask why you fear atheists for simply not believing dubious claims. is it because you know all your claims ARE dubious?
A good deal of strange here, but among what is very strange is this argument that atheism is a religion while at the same time it's been vehemently argued by so many religious people that atheism should not be part of the discussion in the R&S forum. Some real strange head-scratcher arguments one encounters here. That's for sure.
A good deal of strange here, but among what is very strange is this argument that atheism is a religion while at the same time it's been vehemently argued by so many religious people that atheism should not be part of the discussion in the R&S forum. Some real strange head-scratcher arguments one encounters here. That's for sure.
You are free to quote me when I say what I say. Untill you can do that dont start writing fiction. Again we are discussing politics, Greene is a Republican member of Congress. She is not the Queen of America to pass edicts. Not yet.
Does everything go over your head? I did not realize that anti semetic statements were only political and had nothing to do with religions?
By the way I live in a country that has a Queen. She does not passedicts not is that resulted to anything I said.
Well let me apply the logic of some posters here, in the other direction.
Since Lauren Bobert is a theist and said yesterday that separation of church and state is a bad thing, religion should direct the state, and we have all sorts of onerous laws and regulation only because the church obeys them, I therefore conclude that all theists want a theocracy and advocate lawlessness when it suits them.
I further conclude that since Bobert used to be a sex worker and has had two abortions that we know of, all theists are okay with sexual immorality and abortion, despite being publicly apposed to it. And with lying.
(While the conclusions are untrue of all theists, this line of reasoning is actually less untrue than the ridiculous assertions being promulgated by some here against atheists).
Quote:
Originally Posted by cb2008
Lauren Bobert seems to be a Republican candidate and business woman. So she has an opinion. Sexual activities are personal, we dont live in a theocracy that dictates who can have sex, when, and how, or defines morality. We only have legal or illegal. Everything else is subjective judgement.
It is uncanny how quickly atheists start talking like fundamental Christians and want to take us back to the middle age theocracy regarding women's sexuality and abortion, the last of which is against rules of this forum.
They are never far from their religious text - the Bible.
I can't comprehend how you concluded that atheists were talking like fundamental Christians or that they are not far from the Bible, in your response to mordant's post, since all he did was reference what the lady said (about eliminating the separation of church and state) and he didn't even mention the Bible in his post.
I can't comprehend how you concluded that atheists were talking like fundamental Christians or that they are not far from the Bible, in your response to mordant's post, since all he did was reference what the lady said (about eliminating the separation of church and state) and he didn't even mention the Bible in his post.
Well I am expanding your comprehension skills with my conclusions and opinions, just as Mordent was doing with his.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
