Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-11-2023, 10:14 AM
 
Location: Alabama
13,622 posts, read 7,936,616 times
Reputation: 7099

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by phetaroi View Post
So the church would decide to throw out what they didn't like.
Yes, of course.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-11-2023, 10:32 AM
 
Location: Germany
16,779 posts, read 4,982,520 times
Reputation: 2113
Quote:
Originally Posted by EscAlaMike View Post
There's a reason the early Church had no problem combining both the Gospels and Paul's letters into one cohesive New Testament. When read in light of each other, they harmonize just fine.
Except they do not harmonize. Acts contradicts Paul's incomplete letters, Matthew 'corrects' Mark, Luke tries to harmonize, and John reorganizes what the other gospels wrote.

Quote:
Originally Posted by EscAlaMike View Post
If there were really such a conflict between them, one or the other would have been thrown out, as many other "gospels" and epistles were.
The first 4 gospel canon was probably collected to combat Marcion, despite the textual problems. Once the 5 easy to remember stories (the gospels and Acts) were in, it is unlikely they would be removed (although they were updated).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2023, 11:28 AM
 
63,809 posts, read 40,087,129 times
Reputation: 7871
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry Diogenes View Post
Paul neither wrote any of the gospels, nor did he refer to them, or a woman called Mary. Paul uses the word he used for manufacture of Adam (another not born man), and our spiritual bodies he claimed are waiting in heaven for us.

He MAY have meant born, but it is still very strange to change the idiom the way he did.
It only seems strange because you reject the existence of our spiritual Self which resides in Heaven (as a BEC) waiting for us to be "born again" upon the death of our physical body (Spiritual Womb). We are NOT this physical body.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2023, 01:43 PM
 
Location: Sun City West, Arizona
50,809 posts, read 24,321,239 times
Reputation: 32940
Quote:
Originally Posted by EscAlaMike View Post
Yes, of course.
And yet when the media does just that....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2023, 02:21 PM
 
Location: Alabama
13,622 posts, read 7,936,616 times
Reputation: 7099
Quote:
Originally Posted by phetaroi View Post
And yet when the media does just that....
I'm not sure what you're implying; but "the media" is not a divine institution founded by Christ and promised divine protection.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2023, 05:29 PM
 
Location: Sun City West, Arizona
50,809 posts, read 24,321,239 times
Reputation: 32940
Quote:
Originally Posted by EscAlaMike View Post
I'm not sure what you're implying; but "the media" is not a divine institution founded by Christ and promised divine protection.
First off, only catholics see the catholic church as an institution founded by christ. And I think it's very questionable how many catholics actually believe that as well.

But what you pointed out was that MEN -- not god -- made decisions about what to put into or leave out of the bible. They were making these decisions behind closed doors, so to speak. I don't trust them at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2023, 05:56 PM
 
63,809 posts, read 40,087,129 times
Reputation: 7871
Quote:
Originally Posted by phetaroi View Post
First off, only catholics see the catholic church as an institution founded by christ. And I think it's very questionable how many catholics actually believe that as well.

But what you pointed out was that MEN -- not god -- made decisions about what to put into or leave out of the bible. They were making these decisions behind closed doors, so to speak. I don't trust them at all.
And you shouldn't trust them! But the "mind of Christ" (properly understood) IS trustworthy as the standard of truth about the " mind of God," IMO.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2023, 06:10 PM
 
4,085 posts, read 878,741 times
Reputation: 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by phetaroi View Post
First off, only catholics see the catholic church as an institution founded by christ. And I think it's very questionable how many catholics actually believe that as well.

But what you pointed out was that MEN -- not god -- made decisions about what to put into or leave out of the bible. They were making these decisions behind closed doors, so to speak. I don't trust them at all.
The New Testament is books and letters written to the first Christians. The Christian believers to whom the books and letters were written to is what determined these books as scripture.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2023, 07:17 AM
 
Location: Alabama
13,622 posts, read 7,936,616 times
Reputation: 7099
Quote:
Originally Posted by phetaroi View Post
First off, only catholics see the catholic church as an institution founded by christ.
That's not true at all. It's an historical fact acknowledged by any objective observer. Just ask Alexa who founded the Catholic Church. Even Wikipedia says it. It's commonly understood.

Quote:
Originally Posted by phetaroi View Post
But what you pointed out was that MEN -- not god -- made decisions about what to put into or leave out of the bible. They were making these decisions behind closed doors, so to speak. I don't trust them at all.
Of course it was men who decided these things - men who were being guided and protected by the Holy Spirit. Whether you trust them or not is your choice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2023, 07:55 AM
 
Location: West Virginia
16,673 posts, read 15,672,301 times
Reputation: 10924
Quote:
Originally Posted by EscAlaMike View Post
That's not true at all. It's an historical fact acknowledged by any objective observer. Just ask Alexa who founded the Catholic Church. Even Wikipedia says it. It's commonly understood.



Of course it was men who decided these things - men who were being guided and protected by the Holy Spirit. Whether you trust them or not is your choice.

No, it's not a historical objective fact. It's a belief.
__________________
Moderator posts are in RED.
City-Data Terms of Service: //www.city-data.com/terms.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:09 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top