Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Your contempt of logic is shocking!
How could it be a false dichotomy???
It is either one god or many gods.
What is the third choice???
You are creating an empirical false dichotomy based on the BELIEFS of humans which have no bearing epistemologically. There is only one reality according to all the empirical evidence we have.
actually no. that was my comment on your response to Tzaph.
Nothing in my exchange with Tzaph can lead you to my falling for "black and white, binary" thinking either.
It was strictly about concept of dichotomy. Concept, in which she is obviously a little bit out of her depth.
Quote:
Deepities. Hmm have to look that up. must be some profound atheist wisdom then.
Quote:
Deepity
an idea or statement that seems to be profound but actually isn’t; coined by the philosopher Daniel Dennett
A deepity isn’t just any old pseudo-profound bit of drivel. It’s a specific kind of statement that can be read in two different ways: one way that’s true but trivial, and another that’s much more intriguing but false.
You are creating an empirical false dichotomy based on the BELIEFS of humans which have no bearing epistemologically. There is only one reality according to all the empirical evidence we have.
Empirical false dichotomy - what is it? What is the difference between false dichotomy and
empirical false dichotomy?
What does it mean "not to have bearing epistemologically"?
In the statement "It is either one god or many gods" where do you find mentioning of multiple realities?
Without proper explanations what you posted looks like is meaningless, incoherent word salad.
Oh, that's good! I was laughing hard.
And then decided to generate a few.
Quote:
This life is nothing short of an awakening quantum shift of intergalactic intuition.
Quote:
Wanderer, look within and beckon yourself
Quote:
You may be ruled by ego without realizing it. Do not let it shatter the richness of your vision quest.
Quote:
We grow, we vibrate, we are reborn.
Rebirth is a constant. Consciousness consists of pulses of quantum energy. “Quantum” means a summoning of the mystical.
Empirical false dichotomy - what is it? What is the difference between false dichotomy and
empirical false dichotomy?
What does it mean "not to have bearing epistemologically"?
In the statement "It is either one god or many gods" where do you find mentioning of multiple realities?
Without proper explanations what you posted looks like is meaningless, incoherent word salad.
It feels like I am in a discussion with a kindergartener. This thread is about OBJECTIVE reality and that is entirely established empirically, NOT by the BELIEFS of humans about reality. Of course, I forget, this forum and most of the people in it do not hold my view that reality itself and reality alone is the source of our existence and therefore our God. That makes your analysis of logic syllogisms based on false premises, IMO.
It feels like I am in a discussion with a kindergartener. This thread is about OBJECTIVE reality and that is entirely established empirically, NOT by the BELIEFS of humans about reality. Of course, I forget, this forum and most of the people in it do not hold my view that reality itself and reality alone is the source of our existence and therefore our God. That makes your analysis of logic syllogisms based on false premises, IMO.
Yet again, you did not address a single question posted to you.
Maybe you just did not see them? May be bad lighting conditions, or maybe confusion of some sort.
That's OK. Not a big deal. I post them again. Please read it carefully so you can answer.
Empirical false dichotomy - what is it? What is the difference between false dichotomy and
empirical false dichotomy?
What does it mean "not to have bearing epistemologically"?
In the statement "It is either one god or many gods" where do you find mentioning of multiple realities?
It feels like I am in a discussion with a kindergartener. This thread is about OBJECTIVE reality and that is entirely established empirically, NOT by the BELIEFS of humans about reality. Of course, I forget, this forum and most of the people in it do not hold my view that reality itself and reality alone is the source of our existence and therefore our God. That makes your analysis of logic syllogisms based on false premises, IMO.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonof
Yet again, you did not address a single question posted to you.
Maybe you just did not see them? May be bad lighting conditions, or maybe confusion of some sort.
That's OK. Not a big deal. I post them again. Please read it carefully so you can answer.
Empirical false dichotomy - what is it? What is the difference between false dichotomy and
empirical false dichotomy?
::Sigh:: In an analysis of the logic in objective reality, using premises that are NOT based on objective reality.
Quote:
What does it mean "not to have bearing epistemological"?
::Sigh:: It means it is NOT based on empirical data. It is just opinions and beliefs.
Quote:
In the statement "It is either one god or many gods" where do you find mentioning of multiple realities?
::Sigh:: If you had reading comprehension beyond that of a kindergartener, you would know from the bold in my post!!! One reality = one God, IMO.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
