Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-12-2008, 02:44 PM
 
Location: Forests of Maine
37,464 posts, read 61,388,499 times
Reputation: 30414

Advertisements

People do theorize that Adam and Eve were married in a ceremony by God.

However there is no record of any ceremony, and it appears that the 'idea' of requiring a ceremony did not arrive for many centuries.

There remains only one ceremony recorded in the Bible, and it is among the ancestors in Jesus' lineage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-12-2008, 02:58 PM
 
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina
5,137 posts, read 16,587,934 times
Reputation: 1009
There had to be ceremonies as the bible talks about dowries, and seeing if the woman was a virgin, feasts, etc

I believe they were given certificates also know as ketubahs.
The reason I believe that is because of Moses later issuing the certificate of divorce.

The reason why I believe there were ceremonies....
When Jacob married
22And Laban gathered together all the men of the place, and made a feast.

Remember that Jews/Hebrews have festivities for many things starting from the bris (circumcision), when the boy is weaned, bar mitzvah, when is ready to join the army at 20, and when he is allowed to be a priest at 30.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2008, 03:21 PM
 
Location: UK.
348 posts, read 502,624 times
Reputation: 121
[quote=MontanaGuy;5112543]Due to the strangeness of how my mind works I have another peculiar question.

Let's start even further back. I was brought up to believe the Genesis story, but even in my teens I started to worry about certain aspects of it. For instance, we are not told anything about God's personal appearance, whether he was very dark, or very light, or anything in-between. As we are told that he created mankind in his own image, it would be interesting to speculate what the first couple looked like. There I have a slight problem, Montana Guy, since I was also taught not to believe in evolution.

What, then, would you say to this fascinating conundrum? Clearly, the world today is populated with a splendid array of people of all races and colours, but where did they all come from? Say, for instance, Eve was of an Oriental appearance (and we are not told otherwise) - then, being the mother of all women, should we now see no women other than Oriental types - as her descendants? I only ask because you are a self-confessed asker of strange and irrelevant questions, so please help me out here.

Without resorting to the infamous Darwin, who would say that the different races evolved gradually over a long period of time, changing as required by the environment, we must conclude that God created several human ancestors, but not all of them could, of course, be in his own personal image, whatever that may be.

Not a word about this in Genesis, sadly, so I am forced to speculate that the Bible is incomplete, or just plain invention. Oh! and these human variants would have also been invited aboard the Ark in order to survive the flood - but again silence. Is this question off-beat enough to keep you awake at night? - it does me.

I await your reply with great anticipation, thanks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2008, 03:43 PM
 
Location: Nashville, Tn
7,915 posts, read 18,623,378 times
Reputation: 5524
brianrees wrote:
Quote:
There I have a slight problem, Montana Guy, since I was also taught not to believe in evolution.

What, then, would you say to this fascinating conundrum? Clearly, the world today is populated with a splendid array of people of all races and colours, but where did they all come from? Say, for instance, Eve was of an Oriental appearance (and we are not told otherwise) - then, being the mother of all women, should we now see no women other than Oriental types - as her descendants? I only ask because you are a self-confessed asker of strange and irrelevant questions, so please help me out here.
I would be more than happy to help you out. Your first problem was that you were taught not to believe in evolution. It's a problem because evolution is a fact and if you can't accept it as such then you're forced to come up with irrational explanations for things that the Bible doesn't explain.
The world is populated by various races of human beings because although modern humans began as a small population in Africa somewhere in the range of 100,000 years ago and were almost certainly dark skinned because they were adapted to that climate over thousands of years there were many migrations of people who slowly populated the world. They were geographically separated from each other and adapted to their new environments which gradually changed such things as skin pigmentation, eye color, and various physical characteristics that we recognize today as race. The differences between human beings genetically speaking are actually quite small even though our physical appearances are sometimes strikingly different when you compare a very dark skinned African individual for example with a blue eyed, blond haired and light skinned individual in someplace like Sweden.
I noticed you stated that I ask stange and irrelevent questions. I admitted that I do come up with some strange ones but I don't think they're irrelevent and see that you've at least thought about some of the things that just don't make sense about the Bible. I've read the entire Bible and it makes no sense to me whatsoever and I would never use it as a source of information for something that needs to be answered by science.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2008, 04:10 PM
 
Location: Forests of Maine
37,464 posts, read 61,388,499 times
Reputation: 30414
Quote:
Originally Posted by renriq02 View Post
There had to be ceremonies as the bible talks about dowries, and seeing if the woman was a virgin, feasts, etc
It is possible that some form of ceremony may have come into existence somewhere over the passage of time.

There remains only one ceremony in the Bible.

And at that one ceremony only the bride and groom attended.



Quote:
... Remember that Jews/Hebrews have festivities for many things starting from the bris (circumcision), when the boy is weaned, bar mitzvah, when is ready to join the army at 20, and when he is allowed to be a priest at 30.
Sorry, but no I do not 'remember' each of these ceremonies in the Bible.

Could you kindly provide Bible passages where each of these Bible ceremonies occurred?

1. bris (circumcision),
2. when the boy is weaned,
3. bar mitzvah,
4. when is ready to join the army at 20,
5. and when he is allowed to be a priest at 30.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2008, 04:13 PM
 
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina
5,137 posts, read 16,587,934 times
Reputation: 1009
ceremonial or feast.

google it

Quote:
Originally Posted by forest beekeeper View Post
It is possible that some form of ceremony may have come into existence somewhere over the passage of time.

There remains only one ceremony in the Bible.

And at that one ceremony only the bride and groom attended.





Sorry, but no I do not 'remember' each of these ceremonies in the Bible.

Could you kindly provide Bible passages where each of these Bible ceremonies occurred?

1. bris (circumcision),
2. when the boy is weaned,
3. bar mitzvah,
4. when is ready to join the army at 20,
5. and when he is allowed to be a priest at 30.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2008, 04:30 PM
 
Location: UK.
348 posts, read 502,624 times
Reputation: 121
MontanaGuy, My friend - thanks for the prompt answer.

All I can say is that I am delighted to discover that there is some intelligent life on this forum, (you), having wasted a day arguing with the most rabid fundamentalists, and been shocked to the core with the appalling views some of them hold. Being incurably British, I have to confess that I frequently resort to irony, as exemplified by the post I sent earlier.

It's true that I was brought up in a very religious environment, and therefore know more of the Bible than is good for me, and did, indeed, reject the whole thing after much serious thinking when I was a teenager. I have, I am happy to say, never looked back (I am now in my 50s) - and have enjoyed a full life, with, as the wag said, 'no invisible means of support' (other than my conscience).

I am therefore a little pained that you took my posting seriously, as I am a Darwinist through and through, and see far more beauty in the elegance of this school of thought than ever I found in the confused poetry of Genesis.

Please beware of us Brits in future, we have well earned our reputation for not taking anything too seriously, religion included. But honestly, who could resist a forum discussing whether Adam and Eve were married? It's a bit like discussing whether the moon is made of Emmental or Stilton cheese..

(sorry, mate).

I would be more than happy to help you out. Your first problem was that you were taught not to believe in evolution. It's a problem because evolution is a fact and if you can't accept it as such then you're forced to come up with irrational explanations for things that the Bible doesn't explain.
The world is populated by various races of human beings because although modern humans began as a small population in Africa somewhere in the range of 100,000 years ago and were almost certainly dark skinned because they were adapted to that climate over thousands of years there were many migrations of people who slowly populated the world. They were geographically separated from each other and adapted to their new environments which gradually changed such things as skin pigmentation, eye color, and various physical characteristics that we recognize today as race. The differences between human beings genetically speaking are actually quite small even though our physical appearances are sometimes strikingly different when you compare a very dark skinned African individual for example with a blue eyed, blond haired and light skinned individual in someplace like Sweden.
I noticed you stated that I ask stange and irrelevent questions. I admitted that I do come up with some strange ones but I don't think they're irrelevent and see that you've at least thought about some of the things that just don't make sense about the Bible. I've read the entire Bible and it makes no sense to me whatsoever and I would never use it as a source of information for something that needs to be answered by science.[/quote]

Last edited by brianrees; 10-12-2008 at 04:40 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2008, 05:06 PM
 
Location: Jacksonville,Florida
3,770 posts, read 10,575,309 times
Reputation: 2003
There weren't too many laws on the book in the local courthouse,along with law firms back in those days.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2008, 04:35 AM
 
Location: PA
2,595 posts, read 4,439,773 times
Reputation: 474
[quote=brianrees;5660723]
Quote:
Originally Posted by MontanaGuy View Post
Due to the strangeness of how my mind works I have another peculiar question.

Let's start even further back. I was brought up to believe the Genesis story, but even in my teens I started to worry about certain aspects of it. For instance, we are not told anything about God's personal appearance, whether he was very dark, or very light, or anything in-between. As we are told that he created mankind in his own image, it would be interesting to speculate what the first couple looked like. There I have a slight problem, Montana Guy, since I was also taught not to believe in evolution.

What, then, would you say to this fascinating conundrum? Clearly, the world today is populated with a splendid array of people of all races and colours, but where did they all come from? Say, for instance, Eve was of an Oriental appearance (and we are not told otherwise) - then, being the mother of all women, should we now see no women other than Oriental types - as her descendants? I only ask because you are a self-confessed asker of strange and irrelevant questions, so please help me out here.

Without resorting to the infamous Darwin, who would say that the different races evolved gradually over a long period of time, changing as required by the environment, we must conclude that God created several human ancestors, but not all of them could, of course, be in his own personal image, whatever that may be.

Not a word about this in Genesis, sadly, so I am forced to speculate that the Bible is incomplete, or just plain invention. Oh! and these human variants would have also been invited aboard the Ark in order to survive the flood - but again silence. Is this question off-beat enough to keep you awake at night? - it does me.

I await your reply with great anticipation, thanks.
Adam and Eve were probably a darker/olivy color skin. From them came all the colors of skin you see today. There is no need for lots of time, just looking at Mendels Laws shows that variation would have been seen in the first offspring. It is even said that when Seth was born he was in the likeness of Adam. Which means the other children previous to Seth were not like Adam or different colors. So, to answer your question no other people were needed to get the different colors of skin or races. The bible is silent on other people on the ark, because there was no other people on the ark. Sorry to blow your theory out of the water.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2008, 07:32 AM
 
Location: Bronx, NY
1,491 posts, read 3,116,487 times
Reputation: 735
Quote:
It's a problem because evolution is a fact
Montana: last I heard, there are still disputations amongst scientists and others in those groups that cannot agree on some aspects of the evolution theory. As far as I have heard, it is still that: a theory.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:33 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top