You can lead an atheist to evidence, but you can't make him think

[GCSTroop]

Originally Posted by bigthirsty

I hear Ray Comfort and I think banana.

I hear Kirk Cameron and I think Crockaduck.

Perhaps Growing Pains was actually a title made to reference to Kirk and Ray's frontal lobe development??

[sanspeur]

Originally Posted by kdbrich

New book:

Amazon.com: You Can Lead an Atheist to Evidence, But You Can't Make Him Think: Answers to Questions from Angry Skeptics: Ray Comfort: Books

#34 best selling in "Atheist" books. It was #37 a couple days ago.

So kdbrich...How about you lead me to this evidence written about in that book, and give me a chance to evaluate it.

[agnostic soldier]

Ray Comfort is just a large dunbell. There's no reason to get angry at a dunbell since it is unable to think. He(like every other believer) is unable to empirically verify the existence of his invisible friend. He is unable to discern what actually constitutes as evidence, it's just the same old untelligible gibberish.

[MontanaGuy]

kdbrich,
I was having a boring day today. Thanks for the laugh.

[tgnostic]

I see. Some Atheists find metaphysics irreconciliably without the ultimate solution. The solution? Wait a second: to what question? There is the one I asked. How many self-conscious people are there in the world for the existing passage in time? It's gotta' be finite. Hck. How many smilees are there accessible from a quick reply?