Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I disagree that you must have penetration to lose "virginity". There is more to sex than that.
Of course sex is far more than penetration.Thank goodness for that or it would become pretty dull, very quickly...
Still the definition of a Virgin is someone who has never had sexual intercourse ( defined by the dictionary as "penetrative sex") . Regardless of what you do unless it involves penetration you are still a Virgin. You may have had a lot sexual experiences but as long as it's not sexual intercourse, your Virginity is intact.
You seem to be mixing up sexual inexperience and sexual innocence with being a Virgin.
Virginity is a very well defined thing. It has nothing to do with other sexual experiences outside of penetrative sex.
Originally Posted by Kaye02
So, by that logic you can use any word to mean anything you want? Good luck communicating.
I don't seem to have much problem with it. People tend to understand the words I use just fine.
It's true that I can understand the words that you use. The problem is that what you're saying about virginity is so preposterous that it leaves the rest of us shaking our heads in disbelief.
It's true that I can understand the words that you use. The problem is that what you're saying about virginity is so preposterous that it leaves the rest of us shaking our heads in disbelief.
If a sexual experience achieves the same result--orgasm--as penetrative sex, then it negates your claim to virginity. Virgins do not have orgasms. If you have one, you are no longer a virgin.
When I use a word, it means exactly what I want it to....nothing more and nothing less.
Virginal=pure. Someone who has had any type of sexual experience cannot be regarded as "pure".
I'm afraid this is another area where we will have to agree to disagree.
Because I don't think there's much pure or impure about sex, (or a person who has had sex.) It's just a biological function, with some pleasurable feelings attached.
In no way is a woman less pure simply because a penis has been inside her vagina. Nor is she less pure if she's had an orgasim -unless your definition of "pure" is, "a woman has never had a penis inside her vagina or an orgasim." It's a silly distinction created by people who want to control other folks sex lives, and we should have abandoned that type of thinking in the 60's.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
