So Ida isn't the missing link after all

[llowllevellowll]

Isn't scientific discovery wonderful?

People argue, people essentially throw things, they bring objective facts to the table, they reassemble knowledge only to deconstruct it once more...

And none for the prime reason of disproving something else.

If Christians were more eager for truth rather than reinforcing preconcieved beliefs and thoughts, they'd get a lot more respect around the world.

[GCSTroop]

Originally Posted by kdbrich

Wonder why that's not all over the papers the way it was when it was originally declared to be all that. Yet another example of why we just tend to distrust "science".

Weak Link: Fossil Darwinius Has Its 15 Minutes: Scientific American

Did you even read the article? And, if you did, did you even understand what any of it meant, kdbrich? Or are you just scouring headlines to make your religious masturbation fantasies more meritorious?

Wait a second... I see the "Intelligent Design" community made no secondary inspection of Ida. In fact, where is their empirical research at anyway, kdbrich? In fact, it seems that actual evolutionary biologists and anthropologists (read: ACTUAL SCIENTISTS - Not conniving, self-interested convicts and child molesters trying to pull one over on the half-retarded religious community) were the ones who raised the empiricism and scientific validity of the question.

But, wait a second, instead of shamelessly supporting everything that comes out of another scientists' mouth, you mean to tell me that the scientific community questioned something? Well, dare I say that is tremendously different than what comes out of the filth-spewing arrogance of the so-called "Christian Scientific Community" in which you all nod your heads in vapid agreement of something that you hardly understand in order to make the reality of your magic man more believable.

So, go ahead, kdbrich. Listen to your puppet masters sitting atop their armchairs at the Discovery Institute so you can feed yourself into whatever reality denial doctrine you please and sleep tight at night. Just don't get too lost in the deceptive practices of an institution devoted to "Lying for Jesus." I'd hate to hear how you were swindled out of your hard earned money by devious and slimy scumbags using their pseudo-scientific organizations to take money from the less than intelligent folks who believe in their garbage.

[justme58]

Originally Posted by GCSTroop

Did you even read the article? And, if you did, did you even understand what any of it meant, kdbrich? Or are you just scouring headlines to make your religious masturbation fantasies more meritorious?

Wait a second... I see the "Intelligent Design" community made no secondary inspection of Ida. In fact, where is their empirical research at anyway, kdbrich? In fact, it seems that actual evolutionary biologists and anthropologists (read: ACTUAL SCIENTISTS - Not conniving, self-interested convicts and child molesters trying to pull one over on the half-retarded religious community) were the ones who raised the empiricism and scientific validity of the question.

But, wait a second, instead of shamelessly supporting everything that comes out of another scientists' mouth, you mean to tell me that the scientific community questioned something? Well, dare I say that is tremendously different than what comes out of the filth-spewing arrogance of the so-called "Christian Scientific Community" in which you all nod your heads in vapid agreement of something that you hardly understand in order to make the reality of your magic man more believable.

So, go ahead, kdbrich. Listen to your puppet masters sitting atop their armchairs at the Discovery Institute so you can feed yourself into whatever reality denial doctrine you please and sleep tight at night. Just don't get too lost in the deceptive practices of an institution devoted to "Lying for Jesus." I'd hate to hear how you were swindled out of your hard earned money by devious and slimy scumbags using their pseudo-scientific organizations to take money from the less than intelligent folks who believe in their garbage.

Did you not know, he is a ****** in training

[Evidence-is-key]

Originally Posted by GCSTroop

Did you even read the article? And, if you did, did you even understand what any of it meant, kdbrich? Or are you just scouring headlines to make your religious masturbation fantasies more meritorious?

Wait a second... I see the "Intelligent Design" community made no secondary inspection of Ida. In fact, where is their empirical research at anyway, kdbrich? In fact, it seems that actual evolutionary biologists and anthropologists (read: ACTUAL SCIENTISTS - Not conniving, self-interested convicts and child molesters trying to pull one over on the half-retarded religious community) were the ones who raised the empiricism and scientific validity of the question.

But, wait a second, instead of shamelessly supporting everything that comes out of another scientists' mouth, you mean to tell me that the scientific community questioned something? Well, dare I say that is tremendously different than what comes out of the filth-spewing arrogance of the so-called "Christian Scientific Community" in which you all nod your heads in vapid agreement of something that you hardly understand in order to make the reality of your magic man more believable.

So, go ahead, kdbrich. Listen to your puppet masters sitting atop their armchairs at the Discovery Institute so you can feed yourself into whatever reality denial doctrine you please and sleep tight at night. Just don't get too lost in the deceptive practices of an institution devoted to "Lying for Jesus." I'd hate to hear how you were swindled out of your hard earned money by devious and slimy scumbags using their pseudo-scientific organizations to take money from the less than intelligent folks who believe in their garbage.

Nice post!

Originally Posted by justme58

Did you not know, he is a ****** in training

LOL