|
02-19-2016, 05:19 PM
|
|
|
|
19,942 posts, read 16,297,249 times
Reputation: 2005
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjrose
No it was about the sex of the two people getting married. And you can not discriminate based on sex.
|
You were never prevented from getting married based on sex. |
|
02-19-2016, 07:45 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,247 posts, read 13,457,663 times
Reputation: 9860
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vizio
You were never prevented from getting married based on sex.
|
Maybe you should tell that to my state legislature that put it into the state constitution that you must be of specific sexes in order to get a marriage licence together. |
|
02-19-2016, 07:45 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Ontario, Canada
31,373 posts, read 18,651,292 times
Reputation: 13967
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vizio
You were never prevented from getting married based on sex.
|
You are a...um...credit...yeah, a credit to your sub-sect of Christianity.
You drive sheep away from your pen and I thank you.  |
|
03-02-2016, 03:55 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Huntsville, AL
2,852 posts, read 1,442,697 times
Reputation: 5444
|
|
|
It's all about 'normalizing' homosexuality...
'They' want to have their own group to be recognized separately.
I don't know about anybody else, but I didn't wake up one day and decide I wanted to like people of the opposite sex.
I don't believe it's a 'choice' to be gay. It, to me, wasn't a choice to be straight... (to clarify, I am a straight man 56 years old married.)
|
|
03-02-2016, 05:30 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: On the brink of WWIII
21,090 posts, read 27,775,118 times
Reputation: 7812
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tumf
It's all about 'normalizing' homosexuality...
'They' want to have their own group to be recognized separately.
I don't know about anybody else, but I didn't wake up one day and decide I wanted to like people of the opposite sex.
I don't believe it's a 'choice' to be gay. It, to me, wasn't a choice to be straight... (to clarify, I am a straight man 56 years old married.)
|
POPCORN, get your POPCORN..enjoy watching the dead horse take yet another beating as the evangelicals continue their HATE the SIN, LOVE the SINNER fallacy...and use scripture to rationalize HATE and OPPRESSION based on diversity and then demonstrate their superiority by slinging scripture that supports their hate even as Jesus wined and dined the greatest SINNERS on the planet during His ministry.. |
|
03-03-2016, 11:31 PM
|
|
|
|
Location: Iowa, USA
6,542 posts, read 3,907,709 times
Reputation: 3805
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FreeThinkerInTex
The term marriage is a religous term. Marriage is a religous practice belongs to religion.
Please forgive me and pray for me please because I do not won't to be intolerant of anyone, I have no right to be intolerant of others.
I just don't understand why the gay community insist having the term "marriage."
|
The state officiates marriages. It's always been this way, thus it's an issue of civil rights.
And I'm aware that back in the days of monarchs, religious leaders married people, but that was also when separation of church and state did not exist. It was still the state. And either way, it's actually logically impossible to separate religious issues from civil ones. |
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
