Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Renting
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-28-2013, 01:03 PM
 
1,263 posts, read 3,281,848 times
Reputation: 1904

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by STT Resident View Post
I suggest you contact Legal Aid or an attorney on Monday to clarify.

I should add that when you said you were "nice enough" to replace the leaking faucet I initially assumed that you had the LL's permission to do so and that you were paying for it because you broke it. Unless you had specific permission from the LL to purchase a replacement fixture then you can't expect him to pay for it. A leaking faucet usually entails replacement of a simple rubber gasket which costs all of a few cents, not a completely new fixture.
And she donated the faucet anyway, since he didn't agree to reimburse her.

You can probably sue the landlord in small claims court for the 10 days rent if he double-collected. You need to decide if that amount of money is worth your time and effort, then proceed accordingly. The faucet was a gift to the landlord, though. Good luck!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-28-2013, 07:42 PM
 
Location: Silicon Valley
18,813 posts, read 32,512,273 times
Reputation: 38576
Yes, you have a case for the 10 days rent when the landlord got paid by two tenants at the same time. This is a separate issue from breaking the lease, so the domestic violence law isn't really relevant. It's very straightforward that he isn't allowed to collect rent from both of you for the same time. That's all you need to worry about in court.

If it's worth it to you, file in small claims court for the 10 days rent, plus your court fees. You don't need an attorney. I wouldn't ask for money for the faucet. If you just stick to the 10 days rent, the judge will find that fair, in my opinion. I'm just afraid you will look unreasonable if you also ask for the faucet.

What you could do, though, is mention to the judge that you replaced the faucet with your own money to try and be fair to the landlord, as a good will gesture, since you had to break the lease. Say you realize breaking the lease was inconvenient for the landlord, but it still isn't fair for him to collect rent from two tenants at the same time, and you can't afford to just give him that money.

So, your next step is to send him a letter, certified, return receipt, as you have to first ask for your money from him, before you can sue him for it:

Dear Landlord:

Please reimburse me for the 10 days in September (September ____ to ____) in which you collected rent from both me and the new tenant, as this is not allowed by CA law, and is considered "double dipping."

I realize that my having to break my lease was an inconvenience for you, and I did replace the bathroom faucet as a good will gesture, at my own expense, to try and keep our relationship amiable. However, you will be unjustly enriched if you keep my rent for 10 days in September while also collecting rent from the new tenant for those same days. This is not fair, nor is it legal.

Please send the 10 days rent in the amount of $_______________ to my address below by _______________(x date). If I do not receive this amount by then, I will file suit in small claims court for this amount plus my court fees, and any allowable punitive damages.

I hope that you will realize that it is fair to reimburse this money to me, so that we can end this tenancy amiably, and avoid court.

Sincerely,

You
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2013, 09:45 AM
 
Location: SoCal
542 posts, read 1,549,303 times
Reputation: 756
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoMoreSnowForMe View Post
Yes, you have a case for the 10 days rent when the landlord got paid by two tenants at the same time. This is a separate issue from breaking the lease, so the domestic violence law isn't really relevant. It's very straightforward that he isn't allowed to collect rent from both of you for the same time. That's all you need to worry about in court.

If it's worth it to you, file in small claims court for the 10 days rent, plus your court fees. You don't need an attorney. I wouldn't ask for money for the faucet. If you just stick to the 10 days rent, the judge will find that fair, in my opinion. I'm just afraid you will look unreasonable if you also ask for the faucet.

What you could do, though, is mention to the judge that you replaced the faucet with your own money to try and be fair to the landlord, as a good will gesture, since you had to break the lease. Say you realize breaking the lease was inconvenient for the landlord, but it still isn't fair for him to collect rent from two tenants at the same time, and you can't afford to just give him that money.

So, your next step is to send him a letter, certified, return receipt, as you have to first ask for your money from him, before you can sue him for it:

Dear Landlord:

Please reimburse me for the 10 days in September (September ____ to ____) in which you collected rent from both me and the new tenant, as this is not allowed by CA law, and is considered "double dipping."

I realize that my having to break my lease was an inconvenience for you, and I did replace the bathroom faucet as a good will gesture, at my own expense, to try and keep our relationship amiable. However, you will be unjustly enriched if you keep my rent for 10 days in September while also collecting rent from the new tenant for those same days. This is not fair, nor is it legal.

Please send the 10 days rent in the amount of $_______________ to my address below by _______________(x date). If I do not receive this amount by then, I will file suit in small claims court for this amount plus my court fees, and any allowable punitive damages.

I hope that you will realize that it is fair to reimburse this money to me, so that we can end this tenancy amiably, and avoid court.

Sincerely,

You
Completely agree with this and other posts. You have a case for the rent, not for the faucet since you did not provide a written repair request to the landlord during your tenancy. He did not have an opportunity to fix it before you replaced it, so you cannot now ask him to pay for it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Renting

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:23 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top