I agree with your lawyer. You still have to go to court for YOUR case to evict the tenant. Now the tenant has retaliated against you, you also have to go to court for HIS case.
You have to go to court
at least twice, and you'd better show up for each case, no matter how stupid. If the tenant is on disability, he probably already knows how to "game" the system, and is betting on the fact that he has a lot more time and leisure than you do to spend weeks in court.
You also have to pay a lawyer...but I bet he's getting a lawyer for free...thanks to your tax money. He will end up staying in your place rent free as long as he wants because the hearings will take that long. You see it already took a couple of weeks for the 2nd court date? The judge will probably also schedule another hearing for the nonpayment case since it has been challenged.
By the time that passes by, another month will have passed. The tenant will have gotten the 3 months he "needs" to put together the funds to find a new sucker...I mean "landlord."
I had a case with a tenant who sued me because she was upset that I didn't renew her lease. She had lost her job and couldn't afford to pay the rent. It sounds mean, but she also had a place to go, and I don't run a charity. She took me to court claiming the unit was uninhabitable. Although her claims were BS AND her lease was already up, I was still required to attend court.
I also had to file suit in order to get her out of the apartment after the lease term. Again, the lease had expired and I gave her ample notice of non-renewal all within the limits of the law.
If I hadn't shamed her to moving in with her family (She was a single mom, and having fun and living someplace 'cool' with a small child is NOT the way to go if you have no money), she could have dragged me through court for MONTHS. I was pissed since there's an easy option of the unit is "uninhabitable": get out.
But the court system does not work that way. Once the ball has started rolling, you may need a new case to get each little step done. It is better to avoid court at all costs.
In a lot of cases I witnessed, the people were low income and were just buying time "rent free" to find another place to live. The judges also seemed to be strongly on the side of the tenants.
The judge actually scheduled new trials, even though my tenant's lease had expired, and I followed the law in giving her ample notice of non-renewal. Again, I had to go to court for her case, and then pay for another hearing to get her removed although the lease was up.
In your case, I suspect you are also at the mercy of the tenant. Since he doesn't have any income, you can't even hope of getting any money back if you win. There are no wages to garnish, no security at stake etc. You may be in for an expensive couple of months.
Hang in there. Next time, rent to people only when the rent is no more than 30% of their income. They're more likely to pay rent, less likely to sue and people with jobs are less apt to want to spend months in court.