Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Renting
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-11-2011, 07:15 PM
 
2 posts, read 16,129 times
Reputation: 14

Advertisements

Last year the condo building that our condo unit is in had the water shut off for repairs to the building. Our tenant had tried to turn on the bathroom faucet only to find that there was no water. He says that he tried turning it back and forth and eventually was not sure whether it was off or on. He then went out for a few hours and came back and the water was going full blast and overflowing. This water of course went through the floor to the downstairs unit. That owner came home a week or two later and informed all of us of the standing water in his unit. Our tenant was in the process of moving out and admitted the above situation and gave the owner of the condo below the $1K deductible that he needed to start the repairs with his insurance. We do not have insurance as we thought that the HOA insurance covered us, now we know better. With all of the damage to the bathroom of our unit and trouble re-renting it we had to let it go to foreclosure and it just sold this month at auction. Now we've received a letter from Subrogation service that the insurance company of the condo owner below is investigating this $15K claim and wants us to give them our insurance company info, we did not have insurance, because their insurance company has the right to make a claim against the parties responsible. My question is who is responsible? The tenant who admitted negligence or us? How ofter do they pursue these matters? We do not have the money to pay this. Any advice on how to respond to this letter from National Subrogation Services, LLC would be appreciated.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-11-2011, 07:27 PM
 
Location: San Antonio, Texas
3,503 posts, read 19,887,890 times
Reputation: 2771
The subroagation service is looking for who has money to go after. Get them your tenants name, address etc. and let them go after the tenant and hope he had insurance. They may well try to sue you for the damage. If you did not have insurance and have no other assets they MAY leave you alone. the tenant who caused the damage is liable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2011, 10:10 PM
 
Location: Kailua Kona, HI
3,199 posts, read 13,397,703 times
Reputation: 3421
If the tenant was not notified of the water shutoff, I doubt they're going to find him 100% responsible, if at all. Normally all tenants are notified perhaps by 2 or 3 days prior to a shut off like this unless there was an emergency. I'm not sure you can even call the tenant "negligent"; this is what the word "accident" was invented to define and the reason people should always have proper insurance coverage.

As the owner you did not have liability insurance required by most property management companies? Did you have a management company? I am very sorry for your troubles.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2011, 09:54 AM
 
2,059 posts, read 5,748,978 times
Reputation: 1685
Did your tenant have renters insurance? Every place I've rented required a copy of the policy at lease signing.

Who doesn't know if a faucet is on or not even if there's no water coming out?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2011, 02:44 PM
 
28,115 posts, read 63,672,505 times
Reputation: 23268
Responsibility may ultimately be determined in Court...

City-Data is not a venue for legal advice so the opinions provided are only that.

My experience it is standard practice to attempt recovery from as many parties as possible.

Not having insurance puts you in the hot-seat because you will most likely need a lawyer to present a proper answer if this is what you are counseled to do.

Look at it this way... the money you saved on insurance premiums will buy the legal advice you now need.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2011, 03:35 PM
 
Location: Downtown Harrisburg
1,434 posts, read 3,922,748 times
Reputation: 1017
Quote:
Originally Posted by KonaKat View Post
I'm not sure you can even call the tenant "negligent"; this is what the word "accident" was invented to define and the reason people should always have proper insurance coverage.
Came here to say this. Accidents happen. Negligence requires proving that an average person would have avoided the situation, but this doesn't sound that far out to me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2011, 03:57 PM
 
171 posts, read 445,232 times
Reputation: 104
I'm curious to hear what in-writing proof you have that you told the tenant ahead of time what would be happening and what he/she was and was not to do during the process.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2011, 01:41 PM
 
584 posts, read 1,935,864 times
Reputation: 589
this is tenet stupidity if you turn on the water and get none the the water is off. go after the fool. but you canot fix stupid
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2011, 01:59 PM
 
1,595 posts, read 2,764,308 times
Reputation: 849
Quote:
Originally Posted by pendleton42 View Post
this is tenet stupidity if you turn on the water and get none the the water is off. go after the fool. but you canot fix stupid
I agree but unfortunately the tenant may now be nearly impossible to find since he/she is moving out. Perhaps if the OP has liability Insurance, which all landlords should have, or Homeowners Insurance that can pay for the damages. Even if the tenant wasn't told the water was shut off the idiot still should have used common sense. I don't know the law but I would think the Insurance of the owners below can hold you the owners of the rented condo responsible since you are the landlord. But I would imagine that would only be because they can't get the rest of the money from the tenant who willingly admitted to the negligence. They are probably going after you because they can't locate the tenant responsible. Yeah go after this idiot and make them responsible give the tenants name, address and anything else they want on this person.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Renting

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top