Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I'm being relocated for my job and need to break my lease for my apartment 6 months in. I rent directly from the owner of the house, have been on time with payments, no damage and all in all a good tenant. She's allowing me to break my lease provided that I find a suitable replacement that she and my current roommate (who I'm friends with) both agree with the replacement.
Still, I'm fearful that I won't be able to find someone by the time I have to move. When you consider that a security deposit is considered an asset for me, it's looking like the net balance of what I'll owe her is $6,000. What do you think the chances are she lets me walk away from my lease for a penalty of less than that $6,000? I'm asking just in general of course and trying to apply to my specific situation. Do landlords ever allow people to do this for less than the $6,000.
Sure they do - it's all about communication. In any event, even when such cases end up in court, the landlord has to show that he's made every attempt to mitigate his damages and is almost never allowed to collect any more than one month's additional rent. I'd suggest that the three of you (you, the LL and your roommate) combine efforts to find a suitable replacement as finding the right person works to everyone's benefit. Advertising isn't that expensive (craigslist is usually free), word of mouth can be successful; if you're in a university/college town use bulletin boards - the options are limitless. Good luck!
If your present employer is transferring you, aren't they offering you any sort of a relocation package? Some employers will work with your LL and ante up a lease buy-out.
Sure they do - it's all about communication. In any event, even when such cases end up in court, the landlord has to show that he's made every attempt to mitigate his damages and is almost never allowed to collect any more than one month's additional rent. I'd suggest that the three of you (you, the LL and your roommate) combine efforts to find a suitable replacement as finding the right person works to everyone's benefit. Advertising isn't that expensive (craigslist is usually free), word of mouth can be successful; if you're in a university/college town use bulletin boards - the options are limitless. Good luck!
If your present employer is transferring you, aren't they offering you any sort of a relocation package? Some employers will work with your LL and ante up a lease buy-out.
Unfortunately, I'm but a lowly associate who can only expense IRS deductable moving expenses. Things like costs to get out of a lease, surrendered security deposits, etc they won't pay.
She's rejected 2 people. One of them offered to pay all of the rent up front, and she still rejected him. The other guy she rejected because apparently he makes food the smells and she doesn't want it to affect the neighbors.
She's allowing me to break my lease provided that I find a suitable replacement that she and my current roommate (who I'm friends with) both agree with the replacement.
Quote:
Originally Posted by VTHokieFan
She's rejected 2 people.
One of them offered to pay all of the rent up front, and she still rejected him.
Now it's time to call her bluff.
Document everything and then do what you have to do.
Once you're out and NOT PAYING... I bet her standards will come back to reality.
Cross the several bridges that may or may not appear as they come.
So I'd like to pose a question to the legal eagles out there in my instance. If this thing were to go to court, it would appear that I would owe my landlord $6,000 in rent, probably less since it appears I wouldn't be on the hook for full damages since she has to make some effort to mitigate them. Let's just say the judge comes down and says $5,000 is the total judgement for rent, damages, legal fees.
I'm a 25 year old with negative net assets, a car worth $1,600 (according to the county) and 176,000 miles and no real property. Based on what I've read, it appears one may put a lien on real and some personal property in order to satisfy my landlord's claim if I refuse to pay. The Arlington County court information goes on to say, however "If the person you obtain a judgment against has no assets, your judgment may be worthless."
So seeing as I have no assets to seize, and I'm moving across the country to another state, am I correct to believe that potentially the worst thing to come out of this might be a hit to my credit score and a poor landlord recommendation? Are they really going to put a lien on my car that they probably won't get more than $800 in a fire sale?
Have you heard of the saying: "Owe a banker 10,000 and the bank owns you. Owe a banker a million and you own the bank."?
Seems to me it'd be in my landlord's best interest to work with me.
Personally I would have a conversation with the LL and explain your financial position. Let them know that the only thing they are accomplishing by rejecting applicants is a court battle that will yield pretty much nothing even if the LL wins.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.