Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Renting
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-10-2014, 10:14 AM
 
Location: Sandpoint, Idaho
3,007 posts, read 6,287,688 times
Reputation: 3310

Advertisements

Hi,
I have an unusual request on a rental house and I am wondering about rights and options.

They are five adults and one child. A couple, two relatives and two others, one adult and one child. For now, let's assume all the adults and child are related.

All adults on fixed income with social security or guarantors.

My house is a newly renovated, 3/1 and smallish, with two bedrooms 10x10 and one 10x12. One room can serve as a bedroom (though when advertised I was thinking of the teenager in need of more space. Each bedroom can fit one queen or two twin beds. There is only one bath.

My questions:
1) Am I required to rent to them by law? My read on the Federal law is that two occupants per room is the standard, but this law was written to protect families. What if all adults and only one couple?
2) What is the credit test? Each adult must qualify for the rent in its entirety?
3) If they do not pass the credit test, then can I increase the rent to reflect the wear and tear that a five adult lease will present?
4) Related to #3, can I increase the deposit to reflect risk of damage?

I do not want to discriminate. I do want to be compensated for risk and excess wear and tear. I do want to give a home to people who might otherwise not have this chance?

I really appreciate your timely help and wisdom!

S.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-10-2014, 10:36 AM
 
Location: St Thomas, US Virgin Islands
24,665 posts, read 69,703,004 times
Reputation: 26727
Is this your only rental property? If it is, you're not bound by the more stringent laws applicable to landlords who own multiple properties. I'm sure others are better equipped to answer your questions where the legalities are concerned but if I were in your position I would be giving an absolute thumbs down to this group.

Your house in my opinion is way too small for this many people and being a landlord is a business not a philanthropic exercise. As far as security deposits, you can only charge the maximum your state law allows. You'll find your state landlord tenant laws linked in the first "sticky" on this forum.

I hope you can avoid this - to me it's a sure recipe for total disaster. Good luck!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2014, 10:42 AM
 
Location: The Triad
34,090 posts, read 82,964,986 times
Reputation: 43666
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandpointian View Post
Hi,
My house is a newly renovated, 3/1 and smallish, with two bedrooms 10x10 and one 10x12.
...five adults and one child. I do not want to discriminate.
How long has this group been living together?
If long standing with good experiences as a group... maybe so.
Otherwise I'd want to lease to as few people as possible.

If the parents of the child qualify for the income needed...
then list the others (Grandparents?) as known occupants.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2014, 10:47 AM
 
Location: Central Virginia
6,560 posts, read 8,391,660 times
Reputation: 18794
You may want to check your zoning ordinances as well.

In the county I live, there is an Occupancy and Overcrowding ordinance. For 5 adults, the range of total finished area must be 1501 - 2000 square feet. Additionally the Uniform Statewide Building Code requires that sleeping areas designated for one person are at minimum 70 square feet and two or more persons require 50 square feet minimum per person.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2014, 10:51 AM
 
Location: St Thomas, US Virgin Islands
24,665 posts, read 69,703,004 times
Reputation: 26727
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrRational View Post
If the parents of the child qualify for the income needed...
then list the others (Grandparents?) as known occupants.
I disagree. All adult occupants should be signatories to the lease and the only listed "occupant" should be the minor child.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2014, 01:09 AM
 
Location: Kailua Kona, HI
3,199 posts, read 13,396,615 times
Reputation: 3421
First of all, make sure that your policies and application procedures are clear to everyone (in writing) you show the property to and that you apply them EQUALLY to everyone. Every time.

Now, say you have your policy such as ours: All adults must qualify and be named on the lease. All must have good credit with a FICO of at least 640 to 675. Gross monthly income must be 3 times the rent. All must have positive rental history.

Forget any idea of raising the rent or deposit if they do not meet your standards, keep looking for a tenant that does.

If any of the above is lacking in any one adult, turn down their application. The size of the family is not the risk here, it's their ability to pay and their creditworthiness and good rental references from past landlords.

Federal Fair Housing laws and most county codes generally adhere to the 2 persons per bedroom plus 2 persons in a living area (not a kitchen or bathroom) as occupancy guidelines, but the hint of discrimination based on a person's family is the last place you want to go.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2014, 03:57 PM
 
Location: Back at home in western Washington!
1,490 posts, read 4,755,798 times
Reputation: 3244
Are these just applicants that you talked to? Or are they renters of yours already?

It sounds like they are applicants that you have serious concerns about renting to and are looking for a way to tell them "no" (?)

If that is the case, you don't have to give a reason for not renting to someone. Just tell them "Thank you and good luck elsewhere".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2014, 09:52 PM
 
Location: Silicon Valley
18,813 posts, read 32,500,469 times
Reputation: 38576
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandpointian View Post
Hi,
I have an unusual request on a rental house and I am wondering about rights and options.

They are five adults and one child. A couple, two relatives and two others, one adult and one child. For now, let's assume all the adults and child are related.

All adults on fixed income with social security or guarantors.

My house is a newly renovated, 3/1 and smallish, with two bedrooms 10x10 and one 10x12. One room can serve as a bedroom (though when advertised I was thinking of the teenager in need of more space. Each bedroom can fit one queen or two twin beds. There is only one bath.

My questions:
1) Am I required to rent to them by law? My read on the Federal law is that two occupants per room is the standard, but this law was written to protect families. What if all adults and only one couple?
2) What is the credit test? Each adult must qualify for the rent in its entirety?
3) If they do not pass the credit test, then can I increase the rent to reflect the wear and tear that a five adult lease will present?
4) Related to #3, can I increase the deposit to reflect risk of damage?

I do not want to discriminate. I do want to be compensated for risk and excess wear and tear. I do want to give a home to people who might otherwise not have this chance?

I really appreciate your timely help and wisdom!

S.
1) Occupancy limits vary, but the general rule of thumb is 2 persons per bedroom plus 1. That would equal 7 people. You've got 6.

Depending on the ages of children, you can have even more people in the house, if there are babies (not sure of the age cut-off). The law allows a baby in a room where otherwise only two people would be allowed.

Some local occupancy laws include laws about how many unrelated people can live in a house together. Since you said to assume they're all related, in that case, I don't see any way around your occupancy laws, unless there's something in addition to these issues.

The only other way around an occupancy law, is if you have a good argument why your property should have an exception, and you enforce this exception across the board to all applicants. An example would be, for instance, if your septic system could only handle a household of 4 people, something like that.

2) I don't know if this law applies to ID, so check on this, but in CA we have to allow the tenants to pool their income in order to qualify. We can't deny them if they don't each qualify on their own income, but do qualify when their incomes are combined.

3) I think you'd be walking on shaky ground regarding discrimination, if you charge this group more rent than you'd charge someone else, or more rent than you advertised. What I think you could do legally, is charge them a bigger deposit, though. Even this would be a bit tricky, if they chose to question if you always do this. But, I think I'd do it anyway, and from that point onward, have a formal policy in place that over a certain number of occupants the security deposit goes up by 1/2 month's rent or whatever you decide.

4) Woops, answered in #3.

It's entirely possible that these people will be wonderful tenants. One of my best friends is Filipino, and the house they rented was officially occupied by three generations, and was regularly filled to the brim with relatives coming and going from the Philippines of all ages, and they were great tenants, keeping the place spotless and the yard beautiful. They now own their own humongous home that is constantly filled with kids and multiple generations. And the place is spotless and the yard is gorgeous. So, a house full of people is not automatically a bad risk, IMO.

Last edited by NoMoreSnowForMe; 11-12-2014 at 10:00 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Renting

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:47 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top