Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Renting
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-01-2016, 07:52 AM
 
Location: Cary, NC
43,292 posts, read 77,115,925 times
Reputation: 45657

Advertisements

Landlord Accountability Act of 2016
"This bill amends the Fair Housing Act to make it unlawful to discriminate in connection with the rental of a dwelling because the current or prospective tenant holds a housing voucher for rental assistance under section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937.
An owner of a dwelling unit available for rental may not take any action, or fail to take any action, with the intent to make the unit insufficiently decent, safe, sanitary, or inhabitable so that the dwelling fails to qualify for assistance within the jurisdiction of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)."

https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-...ouse-bill/5401
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-01-2016, 08:35 AM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,458,643 times
Reputation: 9074
Illegitimate unfunded individual mandate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2016, 10:23 AM
 
Location: My beloved Bluegrass
20,126 posts, read 16,159,824 times
Reputation: 28335
It's still in committee, so I guess I'll be writing some congresspersons. $100,000 fine plus the tenant can sue me for $50,000? Are you freaking kidding me? I notice there was no clause for how to reimburse landlords for damage to their property by these tenants they are now going to be forced to take. Gee, there is a surprise.
__________________
When I post in bold red that is moderator action and, per the TOS, can only be discussed through Direct Message.Moderator - Diabetes and Kentucky (including Lexington & Louisville)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2016, 12:00 PM
 
Location: North Idaho
32,650 posts, read 48,040,180 times
Reputation: 78427
Fails to take action to qualify the house for Section 8? I've got one that won't pass Section 8 inspection because there is a 100 year old tree too close to the house. I refuse to cut down my tree, so a Section 8 tenant can sue me for that?

Fails to take any action? Reasonable accommodation is out the window? Any action? No matter how much it costs?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2016, 12:54 PM
 
Location: My beloved Bluegrass
20,126 posts, read 16,159,824 times
Reputation: 28335
Quote:
Originally Posted by oregonwoodsmoke View Post
Fails to take action to qualify the house for Section 8? I've got one that won't pass Section 8 inspection because there is a 100 year old tree too close to the house. I refuse to cut down my tree, so a Section 8 tenant can sue me for that?

Fails to take any action? Reasonable accommodation is out the window? Any action? No matter how much it costs?
Egads, didn't even think about that one.
__________________
When I post in bold red that is moderator action and, per the TOS, can only be discussed through Direct Message.Moderator - Diabetes and Kentucky (including Lexington & Louisville)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2016, 01:08 PM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,458,643 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by oregonwoodsmoke View Post
Fails to take action to qualify the house for Section 8? I've got one that won't pass Section 8 inspection because there is a 100 year old tree too close to the house. I refuse to cut down my tree, so a Section 8 tenant can sue me for that?

Fails to take any action? Reasonable accommodation is out the window? Any action? No matter how much it costs?


In Portland you need a permit to cut down a tree. There must be cases where the city won't issue a permit and I'm sure this bill has no provision for that case.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2016, 06:20 PM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ area
3,365 posts, read 5,239,267 times
Reputation: 4205
This has been coming for a while but I doubt it even makes it to the floor for a vote. It certainly won't make it in its current state.

This law is completely negated by a 650-700 minimum credit score requirement, or no late payments on your credit report in the last 12 months or a number of other requirements that will weed out section 8 tenants other ways. Section 8 tenants typically have bad credit history or no history and are easily denied for those reasons as long as you set requirements and follow them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2016, 07:01 PM
 
36 posts, read 39,565 times
Reputation: 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeJaquish View Post
Landlord Accountability Act of 2016
"This bill amends the Fair Housing Act to make it unlawful to discriminate in connection with the rental of a dwelling because the current or prospective tenant holds a housing voucher for rental assistance under section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937.
An owner of a dwelling unit available for rental may not take any action, or fail to take any action, with the intent to make the unit insufficiently decent, safe, sanitary, or inhabitable so that the dwelling fails to qualify for assistance within the jurisdiction of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)."

https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-...ouse-bill/5401
So Landlords should not destroy the house to make the property unfit for HUD assistance. I don't see an issue with that. lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2016, 07:21 PM
 
Location: My beloved Bluegrass
20,126 posts, read 16,159,824 times
Reputation: 28335
Quote:
Originally Posted by maccabees View Post
So Landlords should not destroy the house to make the property unfit for HUD assistance. I don't see an issue with that. lol
No. I take it you have never been through a section 8 inspection. The ridiculous things they fail a person for can be unbelievably nit picky. On the positive side, provided this bill doesn't pass, electing to not fix those pesky requirements is how landlords avoid taking section 8 tenants in states/localities don't allow you to refuse section 8 tenants. What that bill is saying is that if the section 8 inspection nazi says my unit needs a $2,000 widget, that is totally unnecessary, I have to pay for it whether I want to or not. She's trying to get rid of a well known, well used loophole to avoid section 8 tenants. She claims this is a way of making more rental housing available, she is wrong. What it would do is inspire me, and I am sure others, to get out of the rental business.

Maybe she should just write a bill demanding all private owners who don't live on a piece of property just turn it over to the government. It isn't much different.
__________________
When I post in bold red that is moderator action and, per the TOS, can only be discussed through Direct Message.Moderator - Diabetes and Kentucky (including Lexington & Louisville)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2016, 09:43 PM
 
13,131 posts, read 20,995,508 times
Reputation: 21410
Quote:
Originally Posted by oregonwoodsmoke View Post
Fails to take action to qualify the house for Section 8? I've got one that won't pass Section 8 inspection because there is a 100 year old tree too close to the house. I refuse to cut down my tree, so a Section 8 tenant can sue me for that?

Fails to take any action? Reasonable accommodation is out the window? Any action? No matter how much it costs?
No, the purpose is to hold a landlord liable if they do anything to deliberately fail an inspection or if they have a repair necessary to pass an inspection but they deliberately fail to make the repair. So, if you have a unit for rent, you can't remove the toilet just to fail the inspection and if you are missing the toilet, you can't refuse to install one just to fail the inspection.

The summary doesn't give a clear context of the requirement; the actual Bill does.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Renting
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:30 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top