Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-16-2010, 09:13 PM
 
Location: Sacramento
14,044 posts, read 27,222,159 times
Reputation: 7373

Advertisements

Pretty scary findings by the Dept of Health and Human Services Inspector General:

In a groundbreaking study, the U.S. Health and Human Services' Office of the Inspector General randomly sampled 780 Medicare beneficiaries' billings from October 2008. It concluded that adverse medical care is contributing to around 15,000 deaths per month nationwide and costing taxpayers about $4.4 billion a year...The most common incidents involved medication errors - the wrong drug or dose.

Hospital errors play role in 15,000 deaths a month, study finds

http://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-06-09-00090.pdf (broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-16-2010, 09:51 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,950,814 times
Reputation: 7118
Staggering numbers. WTH is going on?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2010, 10:30 PM
 
Location: Sacramento
14,044 posts, read 27,222,159 times
Reputation: 7373
It appears to be just due to sloppy internal processes.

Hard to believe that we lose approximately 180,000 per year due to avoidable medical mistakes.

That is just downright remarkable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2010, 07:35 AM
 
Location: Sacramento
14,044 posts, read 27,222,159 times
Reputation: 7373
Since the study had to do with Medicare patients, I thought this might be of some interest to the folks reading the Retirement Forum.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2010, 08:04 AM
 
7,899 posts, read 7,113,478 times
Reputation: 18603
This is not a "groundbreaking study." Previous studies have come up with similar estimates of the number of deaths caused by hospital treatment errors. We have extremely expensive healthcare with advanced technology but lots are errors are still made. With the high number of errors it is clear that there is no simple source or remedial action which will improve this. All of the regulatory and certifying agencies have been working for improvements. It is not surprising that the best solution is to get patients out of the hospital as soon as possible. The federal govt is also working towards a "pay for performance" model. High quality, efficient hospitals will receive higher reimbursements than hospitals providing a lower quality of care. Of course, there will be all sorts of problems with this. How do you measure the quality? There may also be a problem with access to hospital care. If smaller community hospitals cannot cope with all of the regulations and monitors, they will not be paid well and many will be forced to close. Think twice about retiring to a remote rural area where there may be limited access to healthcare.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2010, 08:22 AM
 
13,496 posts, read 18,195,836 times
Reputation: 37885
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewToCA View Post
Pretty scary findings by the Dept of Health and Human Services Inspector General:

In a groundbreaking study, the U.S. Health and Human Services' Office of the Inspector General randomly sampled 780 Medicare beneficiaries' billings from October 2008. It concluded that adverse medical care is contributing to around 15,000 deaths per month nationwide and costing taxpayers about $4.4 billion a year...The most common incidents involved medication errors - the wrong drug or dose.

Hospital errors play role in 15,000 deaths a month, study finds

http://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-06-09-00090.pdf (broken link)
However, further on the same article says:

"About 44 percent of these incidents were deemed preventable. But in more than half the cases the patients' conditions were so complex, or the patients so frail, that their problems may have been unavoidable."

So, it appears more likely that it is 6,600 deaths were due to mismedication or other carelessness.

This is bad enough.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2010, 10:51 AM
 
14,400 posts, read 14,310,746 times
Reputation: 45727
I saw this same article in USA Today.

We pay more for healthcare per capita in this country than any country in the world and look at how many shortcomings we have. I just don't buy the idea anymore that we have the best healthcare in the world and that reform is going to ruin it. Its not as good as some claim it is period.

To be fair, many of the errors claimed in the report were true accidents as opposed to outright negligence. For example, some patients are allergic to penicillin, but there is no history on record of their being so. So, when they get a penicillin shot...BOOM...they find out in a big way that they have an allergy. Another issue is the use of blood thinning medication. Drugs like Heparin and Coumadin are in wide useage because of bonafide fears of blood clotting, strokes, and heart attacks. Yet, if too much of these medications are used people can die of internal bleeding or suffer other complications.

Yet, it doesn't change the fact though that huge numbers of people are dying because of carelessness and neglect in hospitals. And, at the same, I bet you will the newly elected Republican House of Representatives in Congress scream that we need "tort reform" to lower medical costs. How smart is it to make it harder to prove malpractice with this much negligence--causing this much harm--going on in hospitals?

Enacting these "reforms" would be just plain dumb.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2010, 01:21 PM
 
5,139 posts, read 8,850,891 times
Reputation: 5258
I agree, taking patients on and off these blood thinning drugs can be extremely dangerous. I know one person who had a stroke after being taken off in order to have some surgery, then was put back on and had the stroke.

Another friend of mine had a stroke after having surgery and the doctor just about admitted it was their fault.

And all the staph infections...

Hospitals can be very dangerous places for the elderly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:02 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top