Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-15-2011, 01:15 PM
 
Location: Near a river
16,042 posts, read 21,962,233 times
Reputation: 15773

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by anifani821 View Post
The study found that more than 50% of those surveyed had saved less than $100,000 for retirement, 19% have saved less than $10,000 and 14 percent do not have a pension, 401(k), IRA or any other retirement savings vehicle.
We cannot draw any conclusions from this. Someone may have under $100K "saved" but may have a great pension for life; others may have much more than $100K and have only a tiny pension, or no pension, just SS. I'm amazed (not) that the media keeps chasing these kinds of statistics.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-15-2011, 04:59 PM
 
Location: State of Being
35,879 posts, read 77,444,534 times
Reputation: 22752
Quote:
Originally Posted by newenglandgirl View Post
We cannot draw any conclusions from this. Someone may have under $100K "saved" but may have a great pension for life; others may have much more than $100K and have only a tiny pension, or no pension, just SS. I'm amazed (not) that the media keeps chasing these kinds of statistics.
As I said - all sorts of "reports" out there. My understanding of this one was - assets in total, but again - who knows. I wonder if there really is any way to gather such info accurately. ???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2011, 05:07 PM
 
Location: SW MO
23,593 posts, read 37,460,272 times
Reputation: 29337
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charles View Post
It's the herb!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2011, 05:10 PM
 
12,671 posts, read 23,797,747 times
Reputation: 2666
What about the Silent Generation retirement?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2011, 05:12 PM
 
Location: Brisbane
5,058 posts, read 7,494,606 times
Reputation: 4531
Quote:
Originally Posted by cushla View Post
Here in Australia, if anyone is interested, a lot of self funded retirees are doing it tough at the moment through no fault of their own, having saved and had good pensions they now find the interests rates are so bad and with the economy as it is at the moment they haven't quite got the lifestyle thay expected, so sooner or later they will have to apply for help from the government. We downsized to a smaller property but in a beautiful rural area, this enabled to us live a good healthy lifestyle and money to spare for some luxuries. I'm not sure how the young will fare when their time comes.
I would have though the falling share market would have a lot bigger effect on the lifestyle of self funded baby boomers than interest rates?

My folks are totally self funded, and bought a life style they can afford with their own money, and as such are not directly affected by interest rate rises at all. The falling share market however has totally decimated the value of their pensions. Of any thing interest rates falls are a bad thing, you get less return on the funds invested in cash.

Last edited by danielsa1775; 11-15-2011 at 05:29 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2011, 05:17 PM
 
Location: State of Being
35,879 posts, read 77,444,534 times
Reputation: 22752
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas User View Post
What about the Silent Generation retirement?
Based on what I have read in the past, a lot of those folks retired with pensions. That was the heyday of "company loyalty" and people often worked for a corporation or factory or railroad or the government their entire lives. And typically, that generation did not move around often - and owns property.

The Pew report is pretty reliable. Here is an interesting article on retirement (attitudes, expectations and some asset info) across several generations:

Section 5: Generations and the Great Recession | Pew Research Center for the People and the Press
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2011, 05:27 PM
 
Location: Near a river
16,042 posts, read 21,962,233 times
Reputation: 15773
Quote:
Originally Posted by Curmudgeon View Post
It's the herb!
Ha! I was thinking the same thing, you beat me to it. Chill out, man
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2011, 05:51 PM
 
12,671 posts, read 23,797,747 times
Reputation: 2666
Quote:
Originally Posted by anifani821 View Post
Based on what I have read in the past, a lot of those folks retired with pensions. That was the heyday of "company loyalty" and people often worked for a corporation or factory or railroad or the government their entire lives. And typically, that generation did not move around often - and owns property.

The Pew report is pretty reliable. Here is an interesting article on retirement (attitudes, expectations and some asset info) across several generations:

Section 5: Generations and the Great Recession | Pew Research Center for the People and the Press
So do you think Silent have more money then BB overall?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2011, 05:58 PM
 
Location: SW MO
23,593 posts, read 37,460,272 times
Reputation: 29337
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas User View Post
So do you think Silent have more money then BB overall?
Nothing but questions so far - four in this relativelty short thread already and no comment. What do YOU think?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2011, 10:23 PM
 
Location: Northern Wisconsin
10,379 posts, read 10,907,004 times
Reputation: 18713
I think there are a variety of reasons so many boomers plan to keep on working:
1. Insecurity about the stability of the govt. and the SS system.
2. Lack of investments and savings for retirement.
3. Unwillingness to cut back living their paycheck to paycheck materialistic lifestyle.
4. Having spent all their savings on supporting children into their adult years and beyond, they are just plain broke.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:31 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top