Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-17-2013, 05:07 PM
 
2,076 posts, read 3,444,177 times
Reputation: 2305

Advertisements

Has anyone had the numbers ran for themselves on the pros and cons of taking their pension with survivor benefits (100% survivor) vs not taking the reduced pension and getting life insurance instead? We are exploring that now for my retirement (I ask DH how much I am worth to him?). Our insurance man with our financial planner is looking at it now and it seems that we could come out ahead doing it that way, as long as I get the clean bill of health, which should happen. It would cost less than I am giving up if I take the 100% survivor benefit on my pension. What might I be missing in this picture? Like to hear from anyone who has either looked into this and/or did it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-17-2013, 05:20 PM
 
Location: Alaska
5,356 posts, read 18,574,155 times
Reputation: 4072
I've heard that there are some who do this. As long as the benefit differential covers the premiums, it's a good option. For me, I won't be considering it. There are medical benefits attached to my pension and they would end with me if there is no survivor benefit chosen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2013, 05:25 PM
 
2,076 posts, read 3,444,177 times
Reputation: 2305
Quote:
Originally Posted by akck View Post
I've heard that there are some who do this. As long as the benefit differential covers the premiums, it's a good option. For me, I won't be considering it. There are medical benefits attached to my pension and they would end with me if there is no survivor benefit chosen.
Ahh, good point to consider regarding medical benefits. Need to check on this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2013, 05:28 PM
 
31,690 posts, read 41,124,913 times
Reputation: 14440
Quote:
Originally Posted by choff5 View Post
Has anyone had the numbers ran for themselves on the pros and cons of taking their pension with survivor benefits (100% survivor) vs not taking the reduced pension and getting life insurance instead? We are exploring that now for my retirement (I ask DH how much I am worth to him?). Our insurance man with our financial planner is looking at it now and it seems that we could come out ahead doing it that way, as long as I get the clean bill of health, which should happen. It would cost less than I am giving up if I take the 100% survivor benefit on my pension. What might I be missing in this picture? Like to hear from anyone who has either looked into this and/or did it.
I gave this a long and hard look when we retired. I knew and discussed with folks who did and didn't. There are variables and pro's and con's that can be personal and individual. One of the patterns was that folks I worked with who had pensions also had bigger incomes then their spouses and they were the ones either with the pension or a considerably larger pension. We each had pensions. Hers good mine better. Depending on your age and and your spouses age and your pension metrics it could be smarter or hmmm maybe not. How much of a reduction hit would you be taking? Ours was 17%, I have seen other pension plans where it would be closer to 50% making the insurance option look better. We also had employer provided insurance and good investments and when I crunched the numbers the knowns of not doing it along with those dollar amounts made me not do it. By taking the survivor option along with doing the 62/70 SS plan would leave the surviving spouse at age 70 with a considerable income stream independent of investments. Crunch the numbers and the variables and sleep on them one night at a time and see which night you sleep the best. If neither keep sleeping on them until you do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2013, 05:37 PM
 
Location: Lexington, SC
4,280 posts, read 12,696,547 times
Reputation: 3750
Without a lot of detail, my wife had several pension options so we ran the numbers and decided that max dollars per month with a life insurance policy on her was probably the best financial method. Problem was that as an ex-smoker, the life insurance policy rates were very high so that option went out the window

We did look at survivor benefit options but as women outlive men and the women in her family (genes) live long lives, we decided those options were not worth it so we decided to go with max dollars per month which means bet on her longevity.

In no way is this financial advice. It is what we looked at, evaluated, and decided to do. This was 12 years ago and we would do the same today.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2013, 05:43 PM
 
Location: Alaska
5,356 posts, read 18,574,155 times
Reputation: 4072
I should have added that we could do it with my wife's pension. While we will examine it when the time comes, I'm guessing her medical issues will reduce the policy to where it doesn't pay.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2013, 05:47 PM
 
31,690 posts, read 41,124,913 times
Reputation: 14440
Quote:
Originally Posted by akck View Post
I should have added that we could do it with my wife's pension. While we will examine it when the time comes, I'm guessing her medical issues will reduce the policy to where it doesn't pay.
That is the scary part when do you get the insurance? I know someone very, very well paid who had a wife in poor health. He along with his advisor were big proponents of the insurance path. He was struck with a serious illness prior to retirement and missed a lot of time and was allowed to hang on for an orderly retirement. He became more long term ill than his wife. If he got the insurance before getting sick the increased pension is real helpful now as long as his insurance remains good. If he didn't get it then he has the reduced pension with a certainty. I don't regret not doing it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2013, 06:01 PM
 
2,076 posts, read 3,444,177 times
Reputation: 2305
Quote:
Originally Posted by akck View Post
I should have added that we could do it with my wife's pension. While we will examine it when the time comes, I'm guessing her medical issues will reduce the policy to where it doesn't pay.
Yes, as I said, I think mine will be okay, not a smoker or ex and no major issues but did show up with elevated blood pressure this fall. All tests, blood work came out negative so I truly think it is related to work stress and poor eating habits (slightly on higher side of weight). It will be interesting to see how they take it into consideration. Appreciating the comments and discussion here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2013, 06:38 PM
 
Location: Northern panhandle WV
3,007 posts, read 3,146,725 times
Reputation: 6797
Remember that most life insurance premiums go up as the person ages. I have been paying for 20 years on my husband originally premium when he was 42 was about 85 a month it is now 225 a month and rising.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2013, 06:42 PM
 
2,499 posts, read 2,634,923 times
Reputation: 1789
How long will the life insurance policy be for? Say you retire at 62 and your spouse is 60. You take the higher pension and purchase a 20 year term policy. So at 82 if you and your spouse are still alive can you buy another policy? If you can not and die at 83 what happens to your 81 year old spouse?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top