Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-17-2017, 12:11 PM
 
Location: Eastern Washington
17,216 posts, read 57,072,247 times
Reputation: 18579

Advertisements

In applying for my wife's Medicare, I found out that she can draw SS on my account, her full retirement age (born 1951) is 66. Apparently she will get over $2K per month.

Apparently this does not affect my own ability to draw SS at whatever age I decide to take it (right now I am leaning towards waiting till age 70, but circumstances may change).

Will her SS be regular taxable income for Federal purposes?

Given that we don't really need the money (I earn about $120K per year), if it is taxable, ideas on how to reduce the tax bite? House is paid for, just her and me, no minors or other dependents.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-17-2017, 02:00 PM
 
Location: OH>IL>CO>CT
7,515 posts, read 13,618,508 times
Reputation: 11908
Quote:
Originally Posted by M3 Mitch View Post
In applying for my wife's Medicare, I found out that she can draw SS on my account, her full retirement age (born 1951) is 66. Apparently she will get over $2K per month.

Apparently this does not affect my own ability to draw SS at whatever age I decide to take it (right now I am leaning towards waiting till age 70, but circumstances may change).

Will her SS be regular taxable income for Federal purposes?

Given that we don't really need the money (I earn about $120K per year), if it is taxable, ideas on how to reduce the tax bite? House is paid for, just her and me, no minors or other dependents.
Maybe, it depends on your other joint income. There is an exemption for the first $32K if filing MFJ.

Read the explanation at https://www.ssa.gov/planners/taxes.html where it says, in part:
"Some people have to pay federal income taxes on their Social Security benefits. This usually happens only if you have other substantial income (such as wages, self-employment, interest, dividends and other taxable income that must be reported on your tax return) in addition to your benefits."

Also there is an on-line calculator at How much of my social security benefit may be taxed? | Calculators by CalcXML that you can plug in your numbers and see what, if any, effect there is.

Also every IRS 1040 instruction package has a worksheet for this purpose.

If you will be subject to tax, you may want to have some withholding done from the SS payment. See https://www.ssa.gov/planners/taxwithold.html for more details.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2017, 02:37 PM
 
106,654 posts, read 108,810,853 times
Reputation: 80146
Quote:
Originally Posted by M3 Mitch View Post
In applying for my wife's Medicare, I found out that she can draw SS on my account, her full retirement age (born 1951) is 66. Apparently she will get over $2K per month.

Apparently this does not affect my own ability to draw SS at whatever age I decide to take it (right now I am leaning towards waiting till age 70, but circumstances may change).

Will her SS be regular taxable income for Federal purposes?

Given that we don't really need the money (I earn about $120K per year), if it is taxable, ideas on how to reduce the tax bite? House is paid for, just her and me, no minors or other dependents.
taxes depend on your total household income .

but i am confused . she can't draw off your record unless you file and collect first , you can't delay as file and suspend is no longer allowed . you can file restricted application and get 1/2 hers letting your own grow assuming you are fra . but she can't get anything from your record unless you are collecting first .

in fact she can't even get a spousal benefit added to her own benefit until you collect .

if she has no work record she can't collect until you do either .

the way you are describing it you can't do it

something is wrong here

Last edited by mathjak107; 03-17-2017 at 03:05 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2017, 03:28 PM
 
Location: Eastern Washington
17,216 posts, read 57,072,247 times
Reputation: 18579
Mathjak, I am basing this on more of a remark from my tax accountant. Maybe she didn't look things up and so is not right. I wondered if this is not "too good to be true".

I need to do more research. If she can do this, it won't be till next November anyway.

DW never worked enough quarters outside the house (at least in the US) to have her own SS.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2017, 03:31 PM
 
106,654 posts, read 108,810,853 times
Reputation: 80146
back in the old days you could have done a file and suspend . you file , spouse gets 1/2 and you suspended letting yours grow .

that is now gone .

we are the last group based on our ages to even have restricted application which you can't do since she has no record of her own ..


if she did ,you could have filed for 1/2 her full at your fra and let yours grow .


but nothing can be collected off your record unless you are already collecting. you can show this update to your accountant . i think she should stick to taxes and leave financial planning to those who are in that business .

it would be terrible to plan around mis-leading advice .

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2017, 05:20 PM
 
1,589 posts, read 1,189,044 times
Reputation: 6756
MJ is absolutely right. I too am filing a restricted in March 2018 on my wife's SS; she will be 66 this November and will file in Dec- and DID have enough SS to file on her own record. I will wait to file for my own full benefits until 2022 to maximize both our SS, but during the time between 2018 and 2022 our COMBINED SS will be.....(drum roll, MathJak) $15500 per year!!!

NEW CARS FOR ALL!!! DRINKS ON THE HOUSE!!!

This is why we don't use tax accountants.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2017, 06:48 PM
 
1,180 posts, read 2,922,529 times
Reputation: 3558
Quote:
Originally Posted by M3 Mitch View Post
In applying for my wife's Medicare, I found out that she can draw SS on my account, her full retirement age (born 1951) is 66. Apparently she will get over $2K per month.

Apparently this does not affect my own ability to draw SS at whatever age I decide to take it (right now I am leaning towards waiting till age 70, but circumstances may change)
.

Will her SS be regular taxable income for Federal purposes?

Given that we don't really need the money (I earn about $120K per year), if it is taxable, ideas on how to reduce the tax bite? House is paid for, just her and me, no minors or other dependents.

Even if you WERE 70 and maxed out this year on SS the highest payment is around $3500 of which she would get half- since you mentioned you aren't even 70 yet there is no mathematical way she would get over $2,000 based on your record.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2017, 04:59 AM
 
106,654 posts, read 108,810,853 times
Reputation: 80146
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichiganGreg View Post
MJ is absolutely right. I too am filing a restricted in March 2018 on my wife's SS; she will be 66 this November and will file in Dec- and DID have enough SS to file on her own record. I will wait to file for my own full benefits until 2022 to maximize both our SS, but during the time between 2018 and 2022 our COMBINED SS will be.....(drum roll, MathJak) $15500 per year!!!

NEW CARS FOR ALL!!! DRINKS ON THE HOUSE!!!

This is why we don't use tax accountants.
keep in mind that when you finally do file , if 1/2 your full is more than your wife's full she gets the difference added to her benefit .

we had fidelity test their new in house software for optimizing ss on us . we were one of the first cases they used the new software on .

for the biggest dollars this is the plan they drew up .

i am 64 and my wife 66 .

she has been collecting an early benefit since 62 .

their plan had her stopping her benefit at fra and letting her ss grow again . at 70 she would file again . i would be 66-10 months . i file restricted application for 1/2 hers .

at 70 i file for my own and since 1/2 mine is more than my wife's full she gets 4500.00 in spousal added to her benefit . that would give us about 55k in ss . not bad considering she only worked part time pretty much for decades .

i am playing it by ear and seeing when i actually want to file . i may not wait until 70 . it depends on markets since we are living off our portfolio .

tax accountants pretty much are useless in retirement planning unless like an ed slott that is their specialty . but then they are retirement tax advisers.

Last edited by mathjak107; 03-18-2017 at 05:10 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2017, 05:01 AM
 
106,654 posts, read 108,810,853 times
Reputation: 80146
Quote:
Originally Posted by exit82 View Post
Even if you WERE 70 and maxed out this year on SS the highest payment is around $3500 of which she would get half- since you mentioned you aren't even 70 yet there is no mathematical way she would get over $2,000 based on your record.
spousal benefits are based on full retirement age only and get no delayed credits from fra to 70 . survivor benefits can see those credits for the spouse waiting until 70 but not regular retirement benefits .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2017, 08:04 AM
 
Location: RVA
2,782 posts, read 2,081,537 times
Reputation: 6649
Yes, Matt is correct. Find another tax guy. Amount makes no sense, and she can get nothing unless you file (or are divorced for two years, then it would work!) To answer you original question, if filing MJ, then 85% of her SS will be taxable federally with a salary of $120k. There is nothing that can be done to reduce the taxable amount of SS.In fact, 85% of her SS is taxed whenever your MAGI is over about $42k.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:59 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top