Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-19-2015, 03:15 PM
 
Location: NC Piedmont
4,023 posts, read 3,796,651 times
Reputation: 6550

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by TuborgP View Post
The higher the pension and SS income the greater the cushion to take a hit if either is reduced. At age 70 (2 1/2) years we can take a 25% reduction and still be good. I factored that into our plans and thinking.
My point is that if I retire before taking SS and just use other funds, then I will reduce the balance of the other funds. If the interest rate were to come up enough, it is possible that I could get a fund that would pay enough to support me without reducing principal or reducing it very slowly but that would only be likely if I were taking SS. It is likely that when I get close it will be a simple decision because I think it is unlikely that rates will change that much in 6 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-19-2015, 04:23 PM
 
Location: RVA
2,782 posts, read 2,079,845 times
Reputation: 6649
Same boat here, its fine to plan and be aware of the pros and cons, but when you are 5-6 years out, that's all it is...plans. Heck, I'm not even sure when I will retire, except 65 at the latest, and 62 at the earliest. And that all has to do with my attitude, health, desires, etc and nothing at all to do with adequate finances. Then when to collect SS is a whole other issue all together.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2015, 05:10 PM
 
31,683 posts, read 41,024,360 times
Reputation: 14434
Food for thought about all of this. If you use Fire Calc to crunch the numbers and have a retirement spending goal you may find that by delaying SS you will never need to touch your nest egg as pensions and delayed SS may be more than enough. So from a certain age forward your nest egg could be allowed to sit and in fact you could be adding to it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2015, 05:33 PM
 
Location: NC Piedmont
4,023 posts, read 3,796,651 times
Reputation: 6550
Quote:
Originally Posted by TuborgP View Post
Food for thought about all of this. If you use Fire Calc to crunch the numbers and have a retirement spending goal you may find that by delaying SS you will never need to touch your nest egg as pensions and delayed SS may be more than enough. So from a certain age forward your nest egg could be allowed to sit and in fact you could be adding to it.
Key word "may". I don't have any pension; just a decent tax deferred savings balance and SS. I won't know my numbers until I get really close but my guess is I will need to withdraw over 5% per year but probably less than 8% to support myself with no SS. But things could tank and I could end up working for less in between and need to withdraw 10% or more. If that were the case, taking a smaller SS payment to keep from withdrawing as much could keep the balance from ever dropping. I just won't know until it gets close.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2015, 05:54 PM
 
31,683 posts, read 41,024,360 times
Reputation: 14434
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReachTheBeach View Post
Key word "may". I don't have any pension; just a decent tax deferred savings balance and SS. I won't know my numbers until I get really close but my guess is I will need to withdraw over 5% per year but probably less than 8% to support myself with no SS. But things could tank and I could end up working for less in between and need to withdraw 10% or more. If that were the case, taking a smaller SS payment to keep from withdrawing as much could keep the balance from ever dropping. I just won't know until it gets close.
That's the tough part. Not knowing to you get close and then really knowing when you hit your late 60's. We are in the hindsight stage but I understand your angst at this stage. I had it also. We really had a crusher scare retiring January 1, 2008 and then the meltdown. It came back quickly and we were better off but at the bottom it was a tad scary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2015, 07:08 PM
 
24,557 posts, read 18,230,382 times
Reputation: 40260
Quote:
Originally Posted by Perryinva View Post
Roughly 20% of US households make $100k or more, 11.8% between 100 & $150k, which is close enough to max to be effectively the same. Naturally, the number that made the inflation adjusted max for 35years is likely less, but I suspect greater than 6%, but for "close enough", say 85% of max is likely closer to the 20% number. Is the 6% number those that filed at 70 for max or collect the max at FRA and beyond?
That's household income, not individual income. Only 6% of workers max out their Social Security contribution.

Citation from the SSA:
https://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/poli...pb2011-02.html
Quote:
The percentage of workers with earnings above the tax max ("above-max earners") fell from 15 percent in 1975 to about 6 percent in 1983 and has remained at that level since.
There simply aren't that many people who can show 35 years of 6-figure income. Certainly less than 5%.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2015, 07:39 PM
 
Location: NC Piedmont
4,023 posts, read 3,796,651 times
Reputation: 6550
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoffD View Post
That's household income, not individual income. Only 6% of workers max out their Social Security contribution.

Citation from the SSA:
https://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/poli...pb2011-02.html


There simply aren't that many people who can show 35 years of 6-figure income. Certainly less than 5%.
Max used to be way under 6 figures, though. In 1991 it was 53,400. 2008 was the first year you needed 6 figures to max out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2015, 08:40 PM
 
Location: OH>IL>CO>CT
7,514 posts, read 13,608,655 times
Reputation: 11908
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReachTheBeach View Post
Max used to be way under 6 figures, though. In 1991 it was 53,400. 2008 was the first year you needed 6 figures to max out.
FWIW, in 1963 and 1964, 1 & 2 years out of high school, I maxed out the SS deduction of $4800 those years. This on a $1.695 hourly pay. (How, you ask ? Lots of overtime). As such, those are years 31 & 32 of my top 35. When SSA did its AIME adjustment, they were worth $37390 & $38919. Eventually 26 of my final top 35 years were at those years max. This resulted in my receiving 86% of the max benefit for the year I started benefits at age 70 in 2014.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2015, 09:09 PM
 
Location: Eastern UP of Michigan
1,204 posts, read 872,320 times
Reputation: 1292
Quote:
Originally Posted by Perryinva View Post
Same boat here, its fine to plan and be aware of the pros and cons, but when you are 5-6 years out, that's all it is...plans. Heck, I'm not even sure when I will retire, except 65 at the latest, and 62 at the earliest. And that all has to do with my attitude, health, desires, etc and nothing at all to do with adequate finances. Then when to collect SS is a whole other issue all together.


Your post and the one above yours really hit the nail on the head for me.

I am going to p/t at same employer in the late spring and I will be 62 then. We are going to adjust our spending down a bit to where the p/t work and as little as needed withdrawls will let me stretch out the applying for SS.

We probably have adequate finances but my attitude is no longer adequate.

Just the idea of going p/t has really helped. Also Jim cannot collect off my SS as he is civil service pensioner. So delaying is good, but not going to what till FRA or later.

As you said, when to collect is other issue all together.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2015, 10:50 PM
 
Location: somewhere flat
1,373 posts, read 1,653,739 times
Reputation: 4118
Simple. They want you to work yourself to death.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:12 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top