Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-12-2016, 05:30 PM
 
Location: Southwest US
812 posts, read 794,758 times
Reputation: 1055

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
I wish ,ha ha ha i meant six figures.
Oh, I'm glad that was clarified! Haha, I was beginning to wonder.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-12-2016, 05:47 PM
 
Location: Southwest Washington State
30,585 posts, read 25,135,704 times
Reputation: 50801
Quote:
Originally Posted by jrkliny View Post
INO it is not important to be debt free. In fact after retiring, I bought a new home with a 30 yr mortgage and I also bought a car with a 5 yr loan. IMO owning a home is not important. In fact when I retired I sold my house but still had a mortgage.


The important criterion is having enough income and investments to fund your anticipated expenses and lifestyle. Like many, SS covers a nice chunk of my expenses and the 4% rule covers the remainder. In addition I keep a cushion of over a year in cash so that I can avoid pulling from investments when the returns are poor or the market drops like it has recently.
This is our experience too. We chose not to pay off our mortgage, but did direct as much as we could into retirement accounts which, over time earn more money. I hate to say this, but our home which we lived in for 26 years was a terrible investment. Knowing this now keeps us from doing any major expensive improvements on the house we live in now. And the declining stock market makes loath to spend as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2016, 05:52 PM
 
106,579 posts, read 108,713,667 times
Reputation: 80063
Unless you own an expensive home in a high cost area and sell it and relocate to cheapsville, a home is usually a far better cost cutter then an investment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2016, 08:48 AM
 
4,149 posts, read 3,901,995 times
Reputation: 10938
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
Unless you own an expensive home in a high cost area and sell it and relocate to cheapsville, a home is usually a far better cost cutter then an investment.


Not sure what you mean by this?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2016, 08:50 AM
 
4,149 posts, read 3,901,995 times
Reputation: 10938
Quote:
Originally Posted by silibran View Post
This is our experience too. We chose not to pay off our mortgage, but did direct as much as we could into retirement accounts which, over time earn more money. I hate to say this, but our home which we lived in for 26 years was a terrible investment. Knowing this now keeps us from doing any major expensive improvements on the house we live in now. And the declining stock market makes loath to spend as well.


Why do you say your home was a terrible investment? Unless a neighborhood goes bad or a person bought high house prices went down, houses usually appreciate in value. Especially after 26 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2016, 08:52 AM
 
Location: Western North Carolina
8,036 posts, read 10,626,487 times
Reputation: 18910
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vision67 View Post
To that list you need to add secure, affordable medical insurance.

For most people, that means Medicare. So retiring prior to age 65 becomes a challenge for most folks.
Could you retire earlier and just purchase your own insurance through Obama Care?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2016, 08:53 AM
 
4,149 posts, read 3,901,995 times
Reputation: 10938
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vision67 View Post
As for owning a paid off home, the biggest advantage is no rent due. Zero rent is a nice number.

Of course, it needs to be maintained and the property tax and insurance bills need to be paid.

But the piece of mind knowing that it's difficult for somebody else to threaten your housing is worth the expense.


I live in a 5 house subdivision with no covenants and like the idea that I can park my vehicles anywhere on my property without someone complaining. Rules and restrictions do keep junkers out but can be overbearing at times. Hence we moved out of town to the country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2016, 08:56 AM
Status: "Nothin' to lose" (set 5 days ago)
 
Location: Concord, CA
7,179 posts, read 9,306,900 times
Reputation: 25602
Quote:
Originally Posted by RogueMom View Post
Could you retire earlier and just purchase your own insurance through Obama Care?
I actually was "retired" earlier but went back to work at 61 primarily because our combined health insurance premiums had risen to $2K per month with a $5K deductible each.

That was not affordable to me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2016, 11:09 AM
 
24,557 posts, read 18,230,382 times
Reputation: 40260
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
Unless you own an expensive home in a high cost area and sell it and relocate to cheapsville, a home is usually a far better cost cutter then an investment.
I repeat the statement of JasperHobbs above. This is an extremely ambiguous sentence.

In my case, I concluded at age 50 that I needed a paid-for low cost of ownership home that didn't consume a huge fraction of my net worth in order to retire. Ignoring the evil cable company, my property taxes, insurance, utilities, and a bit of maintenance total about $5K. I at least know I'll always have a roof over my head even if I spend myself out of money. Assuming I hit my financial targets 7 years & 10 months from now, my home will be about 20% of my net worth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2016, 11:46 AM
 
106,579 posts, read 108,713,667 times
Reputation: 80063
But in retirement if you are living in it the worth of it isn't a factor as long as you are consuming it.

All that counts is what are your housing costs relative to cash flow. You can only sell it or take a loan against it to have the equity matter.

Having a paid off house usually means if you had it long enough the house has to double or triple just to cover the interest. By the time we add in taxes. Repairs and renovations the total cost of housing you over decards of retirement and prior is more then most houses will ever be worth.

So it boils down to cost cutting , namely you hope all the expenses of housing you cost less then renting

Last edited by mathjak107; 02-13-2016 at 12:32 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:47 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top