Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-15-2011, 07:04 AM
 
31,683 posts, read 41,030,381 times
Reputation: 14434

Advertisements

Not sure everyone realizes that some public pensions have a negative COLA adjustment. If the basis of how your COLA is calculated decreases your pension is suppose to also since it includes a COLA from previous years. At least one state that does it that way deferred the decrease to the up coming year and was going to subtract it from any increase. Oooops what if the increase is less than the decrease or none at all? With all the strain on state budgets will they follow through with their guidelines and reduce the pension? Plan for it!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-15-2011, 07:55 AM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,827,890 times
Reputation: 18304
It would be nice if you named the state. I know mine doesn't work that way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2011, 10:49 AM
 
31,683 posts, read 41,030,381 times
Reputation: 14434
Quote:
Originally Posted by texdav View Post
It would be nice if you named the state. I know mine doesn't work that way.
Maryland State Retirement and Pension System

Quote:
Baltimore, MD (April 13, 2010)

Governor Martin O’Malley has signed into law legislation that precludes an unprecedented negative cost of living adjustment (COLA) for state retirees and beneficiaries in fiscal year 2011, which begins July 1, 2010. Under the law, benefits will remain at their current levels and the negative cost of living adjustment that would have gone into effect, will instead be deducted from the positive COLA expected in fiscal year 2012.
Lot of folks don't realize it. Not saying your state does but I know a lot of folks don't realize it or forgot.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2011, 11:50 AM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,827,890 times
Reputation: 18304
Maybe that shoudl be the nrom especailly with Social secrity ;its a idea to stop rising cost not promised originally.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2011, 01:15 PM
 
Location: Eureka CA
9,519 posts, read 14,739,463 times
Reputation: 15068
Nope, mine got reduced because they raised the cost of my health coverage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2011, 02:51 AM
 
Location: Pittsburgh, USA
3,131 posts, read 9,372,560 times
Reputation: 1111
I live in PA and possibly we have the 2nd highest population of senior citizens after FL. It would be political suicide to decrease any benefits.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2011, 09:34 AM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,827,890 times
Reputation: 18304
Quote:
Originally Posted by eureka1 View Post
Nope, mine got reduced because they raised the cost of my health coverage.
That is a rise in your insurance cost that comes from the mandates in the healthcare law;not your pension going down, Anyone whose company adopted the healthcare manadates to be grandfather under the law has risen. Mine did also.

Last edited by texdav; 01-17-2011 at 09:48 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2011, 09:49 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles area
14,016 posts, read 20,900,579 times
Reputation: 32530
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterRabbit View Post
I live in PA and possibly we have the 2nd highest population of senior citizens after FL. It would be political suicide to decrease any benefits.
I am aware that PA has a favorable state tax situation for retirees, but I am curious what other factors make it attractive for seniors.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2011, 10:52 AM
 
31,683 posts, read 41,030,381 times
Reputation: 14434
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterRabbit View Post
I live in PA and possibly we have the 2nd highest population of senior citizens after FL. It would be political suicide to decrease any benefits.
Isn't that the group most unwilling to have their property taxes increased? Senior are willing to cut others pensions but not their SS. Most of the seniors in Pennsylvania are not going to receive a public pension. Many of them were born there and are not transplants and are definitely old school
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2011, 10:54 AM
 
31,683 posts, read 41,030,381 times
Reputation: 14434
Quote:
Originally Posted by Escort Rider View Post
I am aware that PA has a favorable state tax situation for retirees, but I am curious what other factors make it attractive for seniors.
Not necessarily that they moved there. Many towns in PA have seen their industries shut down and that along with weather has caused a number of younger folks to move out of state. That has help create the shift in demographics.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top