Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-10-2016, 10:17 AM
 
12,003 posts, read 11,911,679 times
Reputation: 22689

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by chiluvr1228 View Post
Do you believe this one Runs With Scissors: I'm a native New Yorker - When we lived in a small town in North Carolina I had a craving for a bagel, cream cheese and lox. I went to the seafood section at Piggly Wiggly and asked the guy behind the counter for some lox. He pointed to a different aisle and told me to check in hardware. God's honest truth. I knew we had to get out of there before my kids wound up like that.


Hmmm - had you (and your kids) been offered shad roe by this North Carolinian, would you have had a clue what he was talking about? Or would you figure he was offering you a paddle made by some guy named Shad?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-10-2016, 10:22 AM
 
12,003 posts, read 11,911,679 times
Reputation: 22689
As for "folks" sounding archaic to the OP, how would you refer to all those tales collected by the Brothers Grimm, Charles Perrault, and Joseph Jacobs in their respective countries of Germany, France, and England? How about the dances found among the common people in those same and many other places? What about the traditional songs and music sung and played around the world, the ones which like the tales and dances, got written down belatedly after being passed along from generation to generation the old-fashioned way first?

Would you also object to "folk" preceding the terms tale, dance, and song or music in these cases? If so, what would you put in its place? "Youguyslore"? Somehow, that doesn't have quite the same resonance...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2016, 10:24 AM
 
Location: Eastern Tennessee
4,385 posts, read 4,399,147 times
Reputation: 12699
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minervah View Post
I used to think that as well but then I began to hear the term "you guys" being used as an all-encompassing one sort of like the way Southerners say "y'all."

I got a tickle out of the very young people where I used to work calling me "dude." I thought that was only something men were called but apparently now that can be either male or female.
Yes. Back in high school (60's) girls would say to each other "you guys". As in "Hey you guys, wait for me!"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2016, 11:33 AM
 
Location: Location: Location
6,727 posts, read 9,962,294 times
Reputation: 20483
Quote:
Originally Posted by grampaTom View Post
Yes. Back in high school (60's) girls would say to each other "you guys". As in "Hey you guys, wait for me!"

Now, it's "Hey, b#&%$*s, I said wait!"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2016, 11:39 AM
 
12,063 posts, read 10,287,471 times
Reputation: 24801
Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigCreek View Post
[/b]

Hmmm - had you (and your kids) been offered shad roe by this North Carolinian, would you have had a clue what he was talking about? Or would you figure he was offering you a paddle made by some guy named Shad?
yea - doubt anyone in my south texas town would know what that was.

But then if you watch lots of TV (lots based in NYC) - you would pick up phrases like that. Oh well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2016, 11:44 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles area
14,016 posts, read 20,919,144 times
Reputation: 32530
Quote:
Originally Posted by JanND View Post
I'm likely not doing this explanation justice but essentially.....The various changes in the use of the terminology such as "mentally retarded" is meant to be more positive/inclusive than the negative term "retard" and has everything to do with empowerment and nothing to do with nomenclature as it relates to this topic.
Not everyone who has a developmental disability is mentally retarded. So if people cringe at the use of "mentally retarded" it has little to do with how old the speaker is.

https://www.ada.gov/qandaeng.htm

Here's the long explanation:Mental retardation | definition of mental retardation by Medical dictionary

Thank you for going to the trouble to provide the two links. I read the second link in its entirety and I don't see the connection with our discussion. It is a technical, medical explanation about mental retardation, its diagnosis, its degrees of severity, its possible causes, etc. It confirmed my stance that mental retardation is a legitimate term. However, it did make one of the points which you made, namely that developmental disability is a broader category than mental retardation. I was glad to learn that.


I scanned the first link, which is about the Americans with Disabilities Act. I didn't see anything about the terminology of mentally retarded versus developmentally disabled, but I might have been reading too fast.


You have failed to change my mind about something rather basic, however, and that is that discarding the term "mentally retarded" is more about trendiness than about anything else. I see no reason for people to "cringe" at its use.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2016, 01:00 PM
bg7
 
7,694 posts, read 10,569,809 times
Reputation: 15300
Quote:
Originally Posted by cupper3 View Post
Yes, I've been offered hash browns or home fries. And yes, I have often used the term, "the later". Most people understand that. Most.
"The later" or "the latter"?


I use the latter, and people usually understand it. Also I'm a mere whippersnapper at 47.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2016, 01:05 PM
 
Location: Ft Myers, FL
2,771 posts, read 2,307,095 times
Reputation: 5139
Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigCreek View Post
As for "folks" sounding archaic to the OP, how would you refer to all those tales collected by the Brothers Grimm, Charles Perrault, and Joseph Jacobs in their respective countries of Germany, France, and England? How about the dances found among the common people in those same and many other places? What about the traditional songs and music sung and played around the world, the ones which like the tales and dances, got written down belatedly after being passed along from generation to generation the old-fashioned way first?

Would you also object to "folk" preceding the terms tale, dance, and song or music in these cases? If so, what would you put in its place? "Youguyslore"? Somehow, that doesn't have quite the same resonance...
Well ... since you asked ... I was only talking about "your folks" meaning "your parents," not all conceivable meanings of folk or folks. Reread the OP for clarification.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2016, 02:31 PM
 
25 posts, read 23,567 times
Reputation: 144
Quote:
Originally Posted by rodentraiser View Post

Please, tell me you all know what a doily is.
Yep! I still crochet those.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2016, 02:58 PM
 
Location: Baltimore, MD
5,330 posts, read 6,028,021 times
Reputation: 10978
Quote:
Originally Posted by Escort Rider View Post
Thank you for going to the trouble to provide the two links. I read the second link in its entirety and I don't see the connection with our discussion. It is a technical, medical explanation about mental retardation, its diagnosis, its degrees of severity, its possible causes, etc. It confirmed my stance that mental retardation is a legitimate term. However, it did make one of the points which you made, namely that developmental disability is a broader category than mental retardation. I was glad to learn that.


I scanned the first link, which is about the Americans with Disabilities Act. I didn't see anything about the terminology of mentally retarded versus developmentally disabled, but I might have been reading too fast.


You have failed to change my mind about something rather basic, however, and that is that discarding the term "mentally retarded" is more about trendiness than about anything else. I see no reason for people to "cringe" at its use.
I, too, did not understand why the term was changed. But then I remembered children in the neighborhood being taunted with "Hey, Retard! or "Look at Tard!". I think it's best that the term was dropped.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top