Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: People are living longer, so they should work a full time job longer.
Yes, in most cases, I think that is true 27 24.32%
Maybe but only people who work in white collar non physical jobs 23 20.72%
NO! Because there is a shortage of jobs and lets give the young people a chance to work at them 61 54.95%
Voters: 111. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-11-2017, 06:56 AM
 
Location: RVA
2,782 posts, read 2,079,845 times
Reputation: 6649

Advertisements

Do you take the bus to school or bring a lunch? As kids we used that as an example of a nonsense questionaire.

I like disgustedmans answer.

Totally unrelated, but does anyone remember the name of that young person that used to stir things up with stupid, biased polls a few years back?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-11-2017, 06:56 AM
 
Location: USA
6,230 posts, read 6,920,039 times
Reputation: 10784
Obviously you don't because "You're retried now".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2017, 07:02 AM
 
Location: RVA
2,782 posts, read 2,079,845 times
Reputation: 6649
The correct answer is both. Even in retirement! ;-)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2017, 07:09 AM
 
Location: Nebraska
2,234 posts, read 3,318,562 times
Reputation: 6681
In the last year insurance companies are reporting that average life spans is falling.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2017, 07:14 AM
 
106,573 posts, read 108,713,667 times
Reputation: 80058
not really for the purpose of this discussion . life expectancy fell a few months from being tracked at birth . but it has increased among seniors and has been increasing . if you take a 65 year old life expectancy is very different than from birth . it goes out much longer the older you start tracking it .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2017, 07:34 AM
 
Location: Proxima Centauri
5,770 posts, read 3,219,640 times
Reputation: 6105
I didn't vote because I found all of the alternatives unacceptable. If you lose a job in your mid or late fifties it will be very hard to match prior earnings. Working until you are 70 requires you to find a government job in your forties.

Do you want fries with that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2017, 07:36 AM
 
106,573 posts, read 108,713,667 times
Reputation: 80058
if anyone thinks working or finding a job is hard in your 50's or 60's just try it at 80 when you need the money because you were to under funded
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2017, 08:00 AM
 
Location: East of Seattle since 1992, 615' Elevation, Zone 8b - originally from SF Bay Area
44,551 posts, read 81,085,957 times
Reputation: 57734
Must be a lot of young people checking in on the retirement forum, by the votes. We have had a lot of retirements lately, one last Friday and another next week. These last two people are ages 71 and 68. With the required experience for their jobs paying over $100k, they are not likely to be replaced by anyone younger than about 45. Retirements do not always "give young people a chance to work at them." Slightly younger, perhaps. Our federal government thinks that
we should work a full time job longer, and keeps raising the full SS age.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2017, 08:02 AM
 
Location: Near a river
16,042 posts, read 21,963,273 times
Reputation: 15773
We may be living longer in general, but with what quality of life for those who have health problems? Missing work impacts hugely on employers, many with small employee load. Many over 65 are in walkers, etc., getting hip and knee replacements and out of work for months. I cannot see a large argument here. Of course a senior in tip top health at the top of her game, sure. But I'm not so sure that that's that norm.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2017, 08:49 AM
 
Location: Seattle/Dahlonega
547 posts, read 506,597 times
Reputation: 1569
Work until you have enough money to be self sufficient.
At what age that happens is irrelevant.
Stick it to the man.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:26 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top