Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-12-2017, 06:37 AM
 
31,683 posts, read 41,037,032 times
Reputation: 14434

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by cb2008 View Post
Lucky you!
I don't consider that lucky, in fact I consider those having high incomes requiring taxes to be the lucky one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-12-2017, 06:40 AM
 
106,656 posts, read 108,810,853 times
Reputation: 80146
exactly . gimmeee the dough and i will gladly pay my fair share of taxes . if all our income was only in the 15% bracket i doubt we would have retired early as we did living here . .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2017, 07:41 AM
 
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, formerly NoVA and Phila
9,777 posts, read 15,788,843 times
Reputation: 10886
Question: Does it sometimes make sense to start withdrawing IRA/401k money at 59 1/2 to spread out the "income" in order to reduce tax liability? It seems many people put off withdrawing from their IRAs/401k until they are forced to take RMDs at 70 1/2, but after reading on another post on here how higher income can cause SS to be taxed and possibly push you into a higher tax bracket, I'm wondering if this might be a good strategy to spread the income out. I realize that you lose out somewhat on tax-deferred earnings.

We are not yet retired but expect that we will have about $1.5M in IRA/401k when my husband retires in about 8 years at age 59 1/2. Any insight?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2017, 08:41 AM
 
106,656 posts, read 108,810,853 times
Reputation: 80146
a retired couple who delays social security can pull 22k of retirement money tax free just using the standard deductions and exemptions .

they can draw 40k and pay 4.50% tax . that is a gift from the tax gods . once you collect ss and take rmds that same money could see 25% tax .

you can take 8 years of 40k and deplete 320k in ira money while growing ss and pay very very little tax and reduce rmd's
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2017, 09:15 AM
 
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, formerly NoVA and Phila
9,777 posts, read 15,788,843 times
Reputation: 10886
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
a retired couple who delays social security can pull 22k of retirement money tax free just using the standard deductions and exemptions .

they can draw 40k and pay 4.50% tax . that is a gift from the tax gods . once you collect ss and take rmds that same money could see 25% tax .

you can take 8 years of 40k and deplete 320k in ira money while growing ss and pay very very little tax and reduce rmd's
Thanks, Mathjak. That's what I've been thinking about lately. Right now with my husband working our income straddles the 15%/25% tax bracket each year, otherwise I would convert some IRAs to Roth each year. I've always been in the saving/saving/saving mode, but have never thought of the consequences of withdrawing all of that savings down the line. Thanks to some of your posts, I am trying to come up with a smart plan before it's too late. Of course, I know things can and will change, but I would at least like to be informed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2017, 09:19 AM
 
106,656 posts, read 108,810,853 times
Reputation: 80146
this is why the old school teachings are falling by the way side .

conventional advice was always spend deferred money last . new thinking is if conditions are right spend the deferred money first .

this is an example of where i see many planners drop the ball because they do not understand the 2nd half of the game well enough .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2017, 01:39 PM
 
708 posts, read 721,324 times
Reputation: 1172
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
this is why the old school teachings are falling by the way side .

conventional advice was always spend deferred money last . new thinking is if conditions are right spend the deferred money first .

this is an example of where i see many planners drop the ball because they do not understand the 2nd half of the game well enough .
Very good point. Actually I think there are very few financial planners out there that have grasp of the
tax system. Most want to sell you their securities that they make the most commission. Maybe I have
dealt with wrong ones or we don't have very good ones in my area. I found out I have done best to manage my investments myself through my own research and research my retirement financial strategy
using forums like this to develop strategies. Mathjak I respect your opinion more then any financial advisor.
Thank you!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2017, 01:42 PM
 
106,656 posts, read 108,810,853 times
Reputation: 80146
thanks , but my advice is only what i would do and not geared for advice for anyone else
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2017, 01:59 PM
 
7,899 posts, read 7,111,289 times
Reputation: 18603
I wonder what my fair share of taxes should be. I cannot even determine how much I pay in taxes, direct and indirect. Let's see: 8 something percent sales tax, $13k property taxes, a bunch in federal and state income taxes. Should I include all extra money for healthcare that years of deductions for Medicare do not cover. Like $6000/year for supplemental insurance, the thousands my wife paid for donut hole or drugs needed but otherwise not covered? The one that galls me is tax on social security. I paid the equivalent of taxes year after year. Now that I am getting some of it back, I get taxed again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2017, 02:04 PM
 
24,559 posts, read 18,254,477 times
Reputation: 40260
Quote:
Originally Posted by autocratic View Post
You guys who are paying so much in taxes must be very high income.
Filing single, standard deduction, $200K AGI, your effective Federal income tax rate is a bit more than 20%. With W-2 income, you're also paying 1.45% Medicare and maxing out FICA. Uncle Sam still is only taking around 25%. If you're self-employed, paying both sides of payroll taxes is painful but that's not most people.

Only 6% of wage earners max out their Social Security contribution. That jumped to about $125K this year. You have to be making really big money before Federal income taxes become painful.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:42 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top