Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-17-2017, 02:54 PM
 
Location: Forests of Maine
37,313 posts, read 61,111,691 times
Reputation: 30244

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by selhars View Post
Just curious how many people planned and saved for retirement and did NOT factor in Soc Sec.

I (single) -- have friends my age (a couple, 57) -- who will have a million bucks by retirement. And I admit I'm not sure whether it's THEY who want to have enough without factoring in Soc. Sec -- or their financial planner has for years suggested they invest and save to have enough as if they'd never see a dime of Soc. Sec. Which in my mind, of course, means you'll have to have more of your own money.

Now, granted neither one of them has a pension coming. And I have no idea how much they've already been assisted by inheritances. (They have. I just don't know how much)

I just ask because I had my mom's CFP glance at my future retirement situation. (when I was thinking about getting LTCI. So he wasn't actually MY CFP. I asked him to look into LTCI for me, he said let's see how you're set for retirement, before you get that with money you may never see again....so he looked over all my figures, charted various growth projections, etc.)

And -- including Soc Sec. he said I will be fine. And even if, in some scenario where my benefits are reduced even by 25% -- and an increased in Medicaid costs of 25% -- I think I should still be fine, just with less wiggle room. I'll also have a pension and my own money, of course. But it sure as hell won't be anywhere NEAR a million dollars.

So while I hesitate to say I'm "depending" on Soc. Sec., it sure as heck IS in my projections.

Was receiving Soc. Sec. figured in your retirement panning finances?

Thanks.
I am 58. I have been on military pension since 2001. I have not really thought much about drawing SS.

In 1994 among my assigned duties I helped some co-workers to file the forms with the SSA to revoke their SS policies. At that time I attended some training workshops on the topic. Given how much I had paid into SS at that time, I very nearly revoked my SS policy. But I didn't, I kept it. I am not sure if I made the right decision.

In my case, SS could disappear and it would not have much effect on us. We are okay now, we would be okay then.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-17-2017, 03:26 PM
 
Location: Florida
3,128 posts, read 2,234,277 times
Reputation: 9157
I saved through my 401k, plus I had a 28 year pension that I took the lump sum and invested, and I received my very first social security payment today. Retirement is good indeed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2017, 04:26 PM
 
Location: Delaware
242 posts, read 230,591 times
Reputation: 529
Quote:
Originally Posted by selhars View Post

Was receiving Soc. Sec. figured in your retirement panning finances?

Thanks.
I receive two pensions. If I live 20 years (presently 62), they will be worth just shy of a million dollars. In addition, I have been saving in 403B accounts---3 of them, since my early 30s. Believe it or not, I did that after listening to the wisdom of the teachers talking in the faculty room. I retired early, at 59, started the pensions, and supplemented it with some monthly money from one of the 403B accounts. So far, I haven't started the SS. I'm doing fine without it and from what I understand, it increases each month it is delayed. The monthly SS payment goes up to the tune of about $13.00 a month for me. I have figured that for every year I do not take the SS payment, it will take me 6 years to recover the money I forfeited. So if I wait until 66, full retirement age, it will take me 24 years to get the money back that I didn't take. I probably will not wait that long. I'll probably start next year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2017, 04:38 PM
 
Location: SW MO
23,593 posts, read 37,374,306 times
Reputation: 29336
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stripes17 View Post
We are about 9+ years from retirement.

Just had a call with our financial planner last evening to review our projections and SS is most definitely a part of the planning. The only issue we have is whether to start collecting at retirement or deferring until we are 67 or 70 years old.

That won't be decided until we're much closer to the target date.
I know that financially, waiting to start collecting Soc. Scty. makes good sense and people are living longer these days. But there's a caution there. My dearly beloved wife was 68 and died three days ago. That's proof positive that we cannot count upon living a long life. She drew SS for six years. Had she waited she'd have drawn somewhat more each month but only for a year.

Just something to think about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2017, 05:04 PM
 
10,599 posts, read 17,833,775 times
Reputation: 17352
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRR View Post
I guess that just shows you how negative many people are on the country at this time. They actually feel that the US Government is going to pull the rug out from under all the people who will depend on Social Security in their future.
LOL what?

Her point was even when they were a younger married couple they thought SS would go away.

Her point is NOTHING has changed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2017, 05:07 PM
 
10,599 posts, read 17,833,775 times
Reputation: 17352
Quote:
Originally Posted by I am tired View Post
Many middle-aged people who have been paying into SS for years tell me they think that it will be gone in the next few years. They say that Congress will just pass a law eliminating it as a deficit elimination plan. (Even though it pays over 50% of retirement costs for about 60% of the people over 65.)

I ask them if their Congressman had voted for a bill that abruptly ended Social Security, would you vote for him or her. "Well of course not," they said. I think that says it all.
Who are these "many middle-aged people"?

Stop hanging around with Democrats. Nobody is going to end Social Security - abruptly or otherwise.

If ANYTHING, there's proof that "many" Democrats wanted to convert citizens' 401 K into GOVERNMENT controlled investments.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2017, 07:02 PM
 
Location: Northern Maine
5,466 posts, read 3,044,947 times
Reputation: 8011
Quote:
Originally Posted by selhars View Post
Just curious how many people planned and saved for retirement and did NOT factor in Soc Sec.

I (single) -- have friends my age (a couple, 57) -- who will have a million bucks by retirement. And I admit I'm not sure whether it's THEY who want to have enough without factoring in Soc. Sec -- or their financial planner has for years suggested they invest and save to have enough as if they'd never see a dime of Soc. Sec. Which in my mind, of course, means you'll have to have more of your own money.

Now, granted neither one of them has a pension coming. And I have no idea how much they've already been assisted by inheritances. (They have. I just don't know how much)

I just ask because I had my mom's CFP glance at my future retirement situation. (when I was thinking about getting LTCI. So he wasn't actually MY CFP. I asked him to look into LTCI for me, he said let's see how you're set for retirement, before you get that with money you may never see again....so he looked over all my figures, charted various growth projections, etc.)

And -- including Soc Sec. he said I will be fine. And even if, in some scenario where my benefits are reduced even by 25% -- and an increased in Medicaid costs of 25% -- I think I should still be fine, just with less wiggle room. I'll also have a pension and my own money, of course. But it sure as hell won't be anywhere NEAR a million dollars.

So while I hesitate to say I'm "depending" on Soc. Sec., it sure as heck IS in my projections.

Was receiving Soc. Sec. figured in your retirement panning finances?

Thanks.
I'll demonstrate how much fear money breeds.

SS is my retirement, nothing else.
I am very happy with that, have a very nice house and no worries about anything.
Financial planners breed fear. They are salesmen, fear is how they insert themselves into the chain.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2017, 07:05 PM
 
Location: Northern Maine
5,466 posts, read 3,044,947 times
Reputation: 8011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Curmudgeon View Post
I know that financially, waiting to start collecting Soc. Scty. makes good sense and people are living longer these days. But there's a caution there. My dearly beloved wife was 68 and died three days ago. That's proof positive that we cannot count upon living a long life. She drew SS for six years. Had she waited she'd have drawn somewhat more each month but only for a year.

Just something to think about.
Its a fools economy to wait for SS, the Gvmnt knows full well most people never break even.
They appeal to human greed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2017, 09:15 PM
JRR
 
Location: Middle Tennessee
8,131 posts, read 5,597,290 times
Reputation: 15604
Quote:
Originally Posted by runswithscissors View Post
Who are these "many middle-aged people"?

Stop hanging around with Democrats. Nobody is going to end Social Security - abruptly or otherwise.

If ANYTHING, there's proof that "many" Democrats wanted to convert citizens' 401 K into GOVERNMENT controlled investments.
No matter what the subject, there will always be someone to come along and make it a political situation.

Sad

Last edited by JRR; 05-17-2017 at 09:27 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2017, 09:27 PM
 
32 posts, read 50,481 times
Reputation: 56
I just read quite a few pages here, I am sc#*wed... my SS check is 759.00 a month.
Looks like i will be living in a van or RV on BLM land and eating ramen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top