Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-24-2018, 05:37 PM
 
Location: We_tside PNW (Columbia Gorge) / CO / SA TX / Thailand
34,705 posts, read 58,042,598 times
Reputation: 46172

Advertisements

personally...
1) I would not intentionally 'over pay' for a house (even if I THOUGHT I might die there (unlikely I will die in my personal residence, or live a long life in one retirement location)
2) Housing in the US West is pretty steep (Californication - inflow of capital = outflow of lifelong residents who can no longer afford property taxes / often seniors (no Prop 13 OUTSIDE CA))
3) Scottsdale is a saturated market (but I have 2 friends still doing OK flipping higher end homes there, they buy from distressed sellers)
4) 3500 homes on the market ought to give you plenty of bargaining power
5) I only buy 'unique' homes / intrinsic value (View / on a Park / excellent location / in the way of commercial development)
6) If you buy a cookie cutter / standard house... you will have 1000's of others just like it For Sale when you need to unload
7) YOU may never need to unload (if you die there). (Hope your heirs like Scottsdale)
8) A good friend LEFT Scottsdale for another Californicated state (Colorado)... they were native Coloradoan and were not welcome back by the new immigrants (Californians), nor could they deal with the significant decline of QoL in Colorado... so... they are back in Scottsdale.
9) If it is a retirement home... you may be into it very cheap, so appreciation is no longer a wealth building need or strategy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-24-2018, 05:40 PM
 
Location: Redwood City, CA
15,250 posts, read 12,960,932 times
Reputation: 54051
Quote:
Originally Posted by ansible90 View Post
Just wondering... did your husband finally agree to move?
Yes. He's all in. Long story, not sure yet if it's suitable for publication.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2018, 05:50 PM
 
Location: Florida
7,777 posts, read 6,385,415 times
Reputation: 15782
I suggest looking in the valley west of Scottsdale. There are a wide range of homes in the area. The Sun Cities are the most widely known, but there are many others both upscale and less expensive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2018, 05:51 PM
 
Location: Redwood City, CA
15,250 posts, read 12,960,932 times
Reputation: 54051
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erratikmind View Post
Congrats, fluffythewondercat, on seeking another retirement home.

I live a short distance to the north of you in San Mateo County. When I was looking for a second home, appreciation never entered the equation, as previous properties did. However, I did purchase in the best neighborhood that I could afford.
As far as I can tell, pretty much all of North Scottsdale consists of great neighborhoods. There's nothing like San Bruno here. There may be subtle differences that would be impossible for outsiders like us to discern. I hope our agent will tell us, if that is the case.

Quote:
I trust you purchase what suits you. May you have a fantastic retirement journey.
Thank you. It's a nice place, San Mateo County, and some people do retire there if they are financially able and feel they can weather the tax increases that lie ahead.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2018, 06:04 PM
 
Location: Redwood City, CA
15,250 posts, read 12,960,932 times
Reputation: 54051
Quote:
Originally Posted by engineman View Post
I suggest looking in the valley west of Scottsdale. There are a wide range of homes in the area. The Sun Cities are the most widely known, but there are many others both upscale and less expensive.
We are actually more familiar with the West Valley than the East, from all our trips here. It's not what we're looking for. But the 101 loop gets us there quickly when necessary.

For those who don't know Phoenix: The freeways are fantastic. Smooth, free of litter and debris, and the walls are artfully decorated with images of Arizona wildlife. Plus somebody at ADOT has a sense of humor. The safety message boards are hilarious. No Speeding in the 7 Levels of the Candy Cane Forest, indeed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2018, 06:20 PM
 
Location: CDA
521 posts, read 733,331 times
Reputation: 988
I understand where you are coming from. A home is still a large investment and it's only natural to want returns on your investment. You should be able to still look for the more desirable homes out of the lot, the ones on the golf course or with a view or end units etc. I'm sure there's still locations that are considered more desirable and within those locations, maybe the cul-de-sac house, etc. I'm sure if you really hone in you can start finding houses and locations that are more appealing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2018, 06:42 PM
 
Location: Florida -
10,213 posts, read 14,832,045 times
Reputation: 21847
Quote:
Originally Posted by fluffythewondercat View Post
We’ve been shopping for a second, “retirement” home in Scottsdale, Arizona. The area was chosen for livability and for similarity in terms of services offered to where we currently live in Silicon Valley.

There are currently 3500 homes listed for sale here. Worse, Scottsdale is not completely built out with SFHs the way our area is. If you look at historical prices paid on a variety of properties, it seems that few will make any money when they sell. Some take a loss.

I’m not sure how I feel about this. I’ve never bought a property without a reasonable expectation of gain in the long run. I don’t expect the crazy price increases we get at home, where there’s a shortage of houses. But we both like the area and the house styles.

What would you do? Would you just decide you won’t care if the new house never appreciates in value?
If one can afford it, it makes sense to buy a pre-retirement home where one plans to retire.

With only a few exceptions, real estate has always been a mainstay of the American economy and houses have almost always appreciated in value over the years. Scottsdale and other areas of Arizona have long been leading retirement destinations, which has further served to hold property values and appreciation up. Therefore, buying a pre-retirement home, even if one rents it out, never lives in it as a retirement home or decides to live there, serves as a value-holder that keeps pace with one's desired RE market.

Further, assuming one's primary residence also appreciates in value, one has taken real steps to reduce one's post-retirement mortgage debt (to zero if possible).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2018, 06:51 PM
 
13,388 posts, read 6,439,510 times
Reputation: 10022
I would not buy a house I thought would never appreciate, or worse yet depreciate.

I know nothing of Scottsdate AZ, but a cursory review seems to indicate it is something of a boom town and there are lots of areas where the houses would appreciate.

That's where I would buy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2018, 04:12 AM
 
Location: Phoenix
3,211 posts, read 2,242,132 times
Reputation: 2607
Quote:
Originally Posted by fluffythewondercat View Post
We’ve been shopping for a second, “retirement” home in Scottsdale, Arizona. The area was chosen for livability and for similarity in terms of services offered to where we currently live in Silicon Valley.

There are currently 3500 homes listed for sale here. Worse, Scottsdale is not completely built out with SFHs the way our area is. If you look at historical prices paid on a variety of properties, it seems that few will make any money when they sell. Some take a loss.

I’m not sure how I feel about this. I’ve never bought a property without a reasonable expectation of gain in the long run. I don’t expect the crazy price increases we get at home, where there’s a shortage of houses. But we both like the area and the house styles.

What would you do? Would you just decide you won’t care if the new house never appreciates in value?
I'm thinking about buying a second home or condo in Scottsdale. The prices are still a bargain and haven't reached their 2006 peak yet. My guess is that you will get better price appreciation % in Scottsdale than your Silicon Valley property if you measure both at current value. The outrageous property appreciation that SV has gotten over decades is not normal and it's anyone's guess as to whether that will continue.


Now what I wouldn't do is take your SV sale price and buy a similar prices property in Scottsdale, you can get an outstanding house for a reasonable price.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2018, 04:31 AM
 
Location: Phoenix
3,211 posts, read 2,242,132 times
Reputation: 2607
Quote:
Originally Posted by StealthRabbit View Post
personally...
1) I would not intentionally 'over pay' for a house (even if I THOUGHT I might die there (unlikely I will die in my personal residence, or live a long life in one retirement location)
2) Housing in the US West is pretty steep (Californication - inflow of capital = outflow of lifelong residents who can no longer afford property taxes / often seniors (no Prop 13 OUTSIDE CA))
3) Scottsdale is a saturated market (but I have 2 friends still doing OK flipping higher end homes there, they buy from distressed sellers)
4) 3500 homes on the market ought to give you plenty of bargaining power
5) I only buy 'unique' homes / intrinsic value (View / on a Park / excellent location / in the way of commercial development)
6) If you buy a cookie cutter / standard house... you will have 1000's of others just like it For Sale when you need to unload
7) YOU may never need to unload (if you die there). (Hope your heirs like Scottsdale)
8) A good friend LEFT Scottsdale for another Californicated state (Colorado)... they were native Coloradoan and were not welcome back by the new immigrants (Californians), nor could they deal with the significant decline of QoL in Colorado... so... they are back in Scottsdale.
9) If it is a retirement home... you may be into it very cheap, so appreciation is no longer a wealth building need or strategy.
Great information and insight Stealth. Even though I wouldn't be buying for appreciation, I wonder if the Scottsdale housing market will ever heat back up to cause serious appreciation which I think depends on whether Scottsdale keep or expands its status as the high end place in Arizona. I also wonder if Phoenix itself might steal a bit of Scottsdale thunder especially for millenials.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:53 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top