Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-11-2019, 05:50 AM
 
1,489 posts, read 793,904 times
Reputation: 2121

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
No, it doesn't make sense. Your friend probably has some psychological issues.
[/i]
Why would you say that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-11-2019, 06:05 AM
 
3,930 posts, read 2,097,188 times
Reputation: 4580
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deuce88 View Post
Why would you say that?
Exactly. One shoe doesn’t fit everyone, just because someone disagrees with me on what they are going to do I wouldn’t say they have psychological problems.

As I keep saying research your options and whatever you decide, enjoy it because not one of us can predict how short or long our retirement will be nor how healthy we will be to enjoy it. At the end in my book living Life is more important than having extra bucks at the end. Now this doesn’t mean that I haven’t planned to at least be comfortable at the end in whichever decision I took.
So it’s not like the choices are

Take at 62 and be destitute at 85
Or take at FRA and be comfortable at 85
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2019, 06:18 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,184,586 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beach Sportsfan View Post
Exactly. One shoe doesn’t fit everyone, just because someone disagrees with me on what they are going to do I wouldn’t say they have psychological problems.

As I keep saying research your options and whatever you decide, enjoy it because not one of us can predict how short or long our retirement will be nor how healthy we will be to enjoy it. At the end in my book living Life is more important than having extra bucks at the end. Now this doesn’t mean that I haven’t planned to at least be comfortable at the end in whichever decision I took.
So it’s not like the choices are

Take at 62 and be destitute at 85
Or take at FRA and be comfortable at 85
Is anyone really comfortable at 85?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2019, 06:33 AM
 
28,666 posts, read 18,779,066 times
Reputation: 30944
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Is anyone really comfortable at 85?
Betty White seems to have been, at 85.

But we don't know what she really felt like when she gets out of bed in the morning.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2019, 07:10 AM
 
4,717 posts, read 3,267,262 times
Reputation: 12122
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Is anyone really comfortable at 85?
Yes. My widowed Dad is 88 and living in an Independent Living facility. He's near most of the family so they visit and bring him to their places for family gatherings or just for dinner. He has his own apartment with a kitchen but can also get meals in the dining room. They have Happy Hour every Friday evening. He gets the dental care he needs, eyeglasses and high-end hearing aids that are bluetooth-enabled so his smartphone calls go straight to the hearing aids (Medicare doesn't cover eyeglasses, hearing aids or dental care). OK, some of his bodily systems are showing signs of wear, but at 88 that's to be expected, and he doesn't have to clean his apartment, maintain the building or mow the lawn. One of the ladies who lives there took a European cruise with her family. She's 92.

Dad is my role model. A comfortable old age isn't cheap and I have no intention of relying on whatever the taxpayers decide to supply (Meals on Wheels, subsidized senior housing, Medicaid nursing home, etc.) when I can no longer live independently.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2019, 07:28 AM
 
24,559 posts, read 18,248,333 times
Reputation: 40260
Quote:
Originally Posted by Perryinva View Post
IF you have the wherewithal to retire early AND delay filing, you absolutely will have MORE income from the start while young enough to enjoy it, because there is no fear of running out later. I WANT to pull that extra $4k/mo from my portfolio while I am the youngest I will ever be and enjoy ourselves.

Exactly this.


I'm 61. My thinking is that I'm going to happily blow through half my net worth over the next 9 years and then rely on a $45K/year Social Security income stream for a substantial chunk of my cash flow. What remains of my wealth mostly held in reserve to keep me in my house as long as possible and eventually fund long term care. I look at those "4% safe withdrawal rate" articles, shrug, and conclude that there's another way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2019, 08:01 AM
 
1,402 posts, read 477,192 times
Reputation: 845
Quote:
Originally Posted by suziq38 View Post
I would. I paid into the SS system and that money belongs to me. If I take it early, even though it is less money, I can bank it or invest it and leave it to my kids. At least they can inherit it, instead of the U.S. government.
That is one way to look at it. Here is another:

Let's say you carry insurance on your car and home, faithfully paying premiums to Allstate or GEICO or State Farm, every year for 40 years. Fortunately, you are a safe driver and never had anything bad happen to your home, so you never needed to collect. Would you say that money belongs to you, and you got robbed... or were you just lucky?

Now flip it around and imagine you had a fire that destroyed your entire home. You receive a check from the insurance company that totals much more than you ever paid out in premiums. Would you say you maybe weren't so lucky anymore, but you were glad you had that insurance when you needed it most?

Social Security was designed to function like an insurance product, insuring against a destitute old age, with all of us (working Americans) sharing the risk in a gigantic pool. The word is even right in the title of the federal program: "Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance (OASDI)." The equivalent of the "house fire" analogy is one of us living to 100 (as increasing numbers do), and outliving our savings... in which case we keep on collecting social security, far beyond what we paid in.

It was not intended to function as a personal bank account.

Last edited by HeelaMonster; 06-11-2019 at 08:48 AM.. Reason: ETA: none of which dictates the decision to collect at 62 versus 70
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2019, 08:26 AM
 
24,559 posts, read 18,248,333 times
Reputation: 40260
Quote:
Originally Posted by RVFullTimer View Post
Would you happen to know why SS would discount my benefits at age 62? Let's say I would normally receive $1400. at age 62 (I think it is more) but instead they pay me only $1000.?


I was working up until the time I became disabled at age 53 but didn't apply for benefits until age 55.

At 55, you have 34 possible work years since age 21. For SSDI, they would knock off an additional 5 years. They'd be using your 29 highest income years in the calculation. If you had filed at age 53, they would have used the 27 highest income years. You would have gotten more money 2 years ago but not a huge amount more.


Since your SSDI income is so low, I'd guess you're eligible for SSI (cash welfare). I don't know those rules. If the monthly benefit varies a large mount from what you were expecting, I'd guess it's some rule in the SSI program.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2019, 08:26 AM
 
17,341 posts, read 11,274,075 times
Reputation: 40957
Quote:
Originally Posted by HeelaMonster View Post
That is one way to look at it. Here is another:

Let's say you carry insurance on your car and home, faithfully paying premiums to Allstate or GEICO or State Farm, every year for 40 years. Fortunately, you are a safe driver and never had anything bad happen to your home, so you never needed to collect. Would you say that money belongs to you, and you got robbed... or were you just lucky?

Now flip it around and imagine you had a fire that destroyed your entire home. You receive a check from the insurance company that totals much more than you ever paid out in premiums. Would you say you maybe weren't so lucky anymore, but you were glad you had that insurance when you needed it most?

Social Security was designed to function like an insurance product, insuring against a destitute old age, with all of us sharing the risk in a gigantic pool. The word is even right in the title of the federal program: "Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance (OASDI)." The equivalent of the "house fire" analogy is one of us living to 100 (as increasing numbers do), in which case we keep on collecting social security, far beyond what we paid in.

It was not intended to function as a personal bank account.
If that's the case then I should be able to file my claim with State Farm 40 years after paying monthly premiums and receive a check every month from them whether I need it or not. Insurance doesn't pay you back unless you have an incident and file a claim. SS was designed to pay pack those who put money into it. There's no need to show how you have suffered an injury. The money is there because it's yours. SS expects you to file and get some money out if it without the need of being destitute.
If you want to treat it as auto insurance and never get a penny back after paying into it for 40 years, then no one is stopping anyone else from not filing and getting benefits.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2019, 08:31 AM
 
Location: Kuna, ID
287 posts, read 211,910 times
Reputation: 1071
What about taxes? 100% of my portfolio withdrawals are taxable, while only 85% of my SSI would be taxable. My taxes will go down if I draw at 62, leaving me more money. Of course our illustrious Congress could change that in the the blink of an eye, but it's the reality now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:56 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top