Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-07-2022, 11:28 AM
 
Location: Was Midvalley Oregon; Now Eastside Seattle area
13,070 posts, read 7,505,741 times
Reputation: 9796

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by leastprime View Post
All my collared shirts are minimally +10 years old.
YSMV
Other than that, just my/our discretionary trading accounts are down, at least 25%YtD. High risk.
All of the IRAs are now in RMD status. I've even minimized all trading account IRAs and IRAs in longevity-income, GLWB annuities to just RMD income. I need to get a better handle of our Income and taxes. Our tax accountant is late (its not that complicated) but we sold income property in 2021 and we are not absolutely sure if we set enough aside. I don't count the discretionary trading accounts to be in our retirement budget.
YMMV
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-07-2022, 11:35 AM
 
8,373 posts, read 4,386,334 times
Reputation: 12033
Quote:
Originally Posted by HB2HSV View Post
Simple. To keep the rest of your money without risking it to more losses. It's called the preservation of capital.

I learned it painfully back in the 90s watching my stocks tanked but everyone (the experts) said keep it in the market "for the long term", but only to watch $100/sh stocks dropped down to pennies. So it can happen.



But a fund has a lot of different stocks in it - how likely is it that all of them will drop to near-zero, and not recover in 20 years? Also, my fund is managed, so it is up to the guy who manages it to think what to buy/sell and when. I would have no clue, not my field.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2022, 11:56 AM
 
106,646 posts, read 108,790,719 times
Reputation: 80122
Quote:
Originally Posted by MadManofBethesda View Post
Wow, you actually surprised me with that answer.




If I was smarter I would have set a side way more cash and done roths . That way I could make more use of the zero bracket .

Now it doesn’t matter .

We closed out our LLC and had a boatload of capitalized expenses to take .

I can only take them against capital gains except for 3k a year against regular income .

I don’t expect to have enough gains in the taxable account to use it all up for many many years
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2022, 01:06 PM
 
Location: Reno, NV
5,987 posts, read 10,469,507 times
Reputation: 10809
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
You still don’t get it

They can raise a dividend to the moon

There is a reduction of equal amount left compounding
I do get it, and you are technically right, but it doesn't work out in practice quite the way it does in theory. And it does not address the historically better performance that dividend-payers have enjoyed vs. the SP500. I WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ABLE TO PAY MY BILLS AND INCREASE MY INCOME THESE PAST 3 YEARS WITHOUT MY DIVIDEND STOCKS. For me, that's ALL that matters at this time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2022, 01:30 PM
 
7,774 posts, read 3,803,815 times
Reputation: 14698
Quote:
Originally Posted by HB2HSV View Post
It's noteworthy that this past week's sell off was in reaction to the Fed raising interest rate by 0.5%.
Not really. The half point was already priced in long ago.

The sell off was because of the unforced error of Chairman Powell being needlessly dovish in the press conference, saying future rate hikes greater than a half point were off the table.

The unnecessary dovishness translates to higher expectations for inflation down the road compared to what they otherwise would be, which means the future stream of earnings by companies are discounted back to the present at a higher interest rate. Those future earnings are hence worth less in today's dollars and hence a lower stock price is justified.

There was no reason for Powell to say 3/4 point increases are off the table. It shows that in his gut he still thinks inflation is more a result of one-time shocks to the supply chain and the Russian invasion than a result of the Fed's massive expansion of the money supply in response to the Pandemic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2022, 01:31 PM
 
106,646 posts, read 108,790,719 times
Reputation: 80122
Quote:
Originally Posted by moguldreamer View Post
Not really. The half point was already priced in long ago.

The sell off was because of the unforced error of Chairman Powell being needlessly dovish in the press conference, saying future rate hikes greater than a half point were off the table.

The unnecessary dovishness translates to higher expectations for inflation down the road compared to what they otherwise would be, which means the future stream of earnings by companies are discounted back to the present at a higher interest rate. Those future earnings are hence worth less in today's dollars and hence a lower stock price is justified.

There was no reason for Powell to say 3/4 point increases are off the table. It shows that in his gut he still thinks inflation is more a result of one-time shocks to the supply chain and the Russian invasion than a result of the Fed's massive expansion of the money supply in response to the Pandemic.
That seems to be the problem . He spooked the markets
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2022, 01:33 PM
 
106,646 posts, read 108,790,719 times
Reputation: 80122
Quote:
Originally Posted by TaoistDude View Post
I do get it, and you are technically right, but it doesn't work out in practice quite the way it does in theory. And it does not address the historically better performance that dividend-payers have enjoyed vs. the SP500. I WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ABLE TO PAY MY BILLS AND INCREASE MY INCOME THESE PAST 3 YEARS WITHOUT MY DIVIDEND STOCKS. For me, that's ALL that matters at this time.
80% of the S&P are dividend payers so the comment that “ And it does not address the historically better performance that dividend-payers have enjoyed vs. the SP500.“ makes no sense.

I mean if you want to talk the highest dividend paying stocks in the dow , which are called the dogs of the dow ,they lagged the S&P 500 the last few years

If you are talking cherry picking specific stocks to compare to the S&P that is something else .. so that comment really makes no sense.

There is a lot of other stuff you said as well as income not keeping up which is likely way off base as well .

So little makes financial sense

Your claims without the whole financial picture means little to any of us

Give us specific stocks you have or funds and I will do a comparison for you

Last edited by mathjak107; 05-07-2022 at 01:45 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2022, 01:42 PM
 
Location: Capital Region, NY
2,478 posts, read 1,549,473 times
Reputation: 3555
Our 403b’s are 70% equities and our Roths are 100% equities. We have continued to DCA through everything. Got out a couple years back and got back in in time to catch about half the climb. Not likely to make that costly mistake again.

We will hold onto our bootstraps and hang in there. Still working and hope things turn around positively within five years or so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2022, 02:22 PM
 
10,800 posts, read 3,593,128 times
Reputation: 5951
Quote:
Originally Posted by loveautumn View Post
Wondering how everybody is faring in this market downturn. Did you sell or hang in there? How much confidence do you have since most predictions say it’s not over yet. Personally I’ve lost a chunk and not even heavily invested in shocks. At my age, it’s scary.
Only if they bought in at the top. If you bought 2 years ago, you are still up 14,000 points. A correction was long overdue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2022, 02:42 PM
 
Location: Columbia SC
14,246 posts, read 14,733,373 times
Reputation: 22189
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
Selling is for amateurs who thought they knew their risk tolerance and didn’t or they don’t understand how hard it is timing their way back in.

The time to think about selling was when we were hitting new highs
I agree. I am invested in various mutual funds (Fidelity and Vanguard) and I am riding it out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:18 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top