Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-29-2023, 11:22 AM
509 509 started this thread
 
6,321 posts, read 7,040,053 times
Reputation: 9444

Advertisements

A couple of years ago I thought my health insurance company had made an "honest" error in my health insurance billing.

The initial call indicated they would fix the problem, but a follow-up call indicated that they were running a large scale fraud operation and they wanted me to appeal through their channels rather than legal channels.

The Attorney General for the state of Washington was willing to take the fraud case, but I had poor notes and had to write down the conversations from memory. I didn't expect to file a fraud case.

Their suggestion was to in the future tape the phone conversations.

In some states, you don't need tell the other party that they are being recorded, BUT in a majority of states both parties must be notified that the conversation is being taped.

Here is a short article on how to do it.

https://www.zdnet.com/article/how-to...all-on-iphone/

Yeah, I am calling the insurance company AGAIN, this time I am NOT assuming it was an HONEST ERROR.

By the way, the large scale fraud operation was simple. For some appointments, they used an OUT-OF-NETWORK address for the medical clinic.

EVEN THOUGH it was the same doctor, in the same room that I get ALL my medical care, except for emergencies. It was suppose to be a FREE PHYSICAL as specified on PAGE 38 of the insurance contract. They simply used the out-of-network address and it automatically generated a 51 dollar charge for the doctors visit and most of friends just paid it!!!

President Trump signed the NO SURPRISES ACT in 2020, that got rid of the practice by requiring the medical facility to tell it was a OUT OF NETWORK visit beforehand and the insurance had to pay for a network visit unless this was done at the beginning of the visit.

Anyway, it is a handy way to use an IPHONE and IPAD to document phone calls with insurance companies and others.

Just don't forget to tell them your recording the call!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-29-2023, 11:46 AM
 
23,591 posts, read 70,374,939 times
Reputation: 49231
That is decent advice, but I go one better. I do not discuss anything that might involve future litigation over the phone. I write a snail mail letter instead and keep a copy. If I see a strong potential for dispute, I do a CC to a third party.

Show up with a strong case and strong documentation and most times you quickly end up on top.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2023, 02:02 PM
509 509 started this thread
 
6,321 posts, read 7,040,053 times
Reputation: 9444
That was definitely fun.

They are on their best behavior when you tell them the phone call is being recorded!!

What a circus.

My prescription was turned down by a company that had NO BUSINESS relationship with me. Instead of saying this person is not our customer, they just turned down the prescription.

The pharmacist said it didn't matter to whom the prescription approval was sent to, and I could just fill the prescription by paying cash!!!!!

REALLY...how easily we accept corporate corruption and incompetence these days.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2023, 02:49 PM
 
Location: East TN
11,105 posts, read 9,748,456 times
Reputation: 40488
Is there some reason you couldn't simply have the Dr's office re-submit the claim with the proper address? Our doctor's staff will go way out of their way to get the insurance company to cover things that are denied. In the past I argued my case on the phone until I was blue in the face, but once I talked to the Dr's office, they quickly spotted the error that caused the initial denial, and it was quickly approved by the insurance after the error was pointed out. Incidentally, I needed the device that was denied immediately and paid cash out of pocket for it, and then was re-imbursed by the insurance as soon as my appeal was approved. Just save your receipts!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2023, 02:59 PM
 
473 posts, read 404,823 times
Reputation: 1561
The article OP posted does not actually list the states that require 2 party consent. There are 11 states that require both parties to agree: California, Delaware, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, and Washington. All others do not have a 2-party consent requirement.


Also, the article only addressed Iphones. Apps on devices with Android 9 and earlier should still be able to record phone calls without bumping into Google’s latest restrictions. But apps on phones with Android 10 or higher that try to use the accessibility service may run afoul of Google’s new policy.


https://www.pcmag.com/how-to/record-...-android-phone
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2023, 04:26 PM
509 509 started this thread
 
6,321 posts, read 7,040,053 times
Reputation: 9444
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheShadow View Post
Is there some reason you couldn't simply have the Dr's office re-submit the claim with the proper address? Our doctor's staff will go way out of their way to get the insurance company to cover things that are denied. In the past I argued my case on the phone until I was blue in the face, but once I talked to the Dr's office, they quickly spotted the error that caused the initial denial, and it was quickly approved by the insurance after the error was pointed out. Incidentally, I needed the device that was denied immediately and paid cash out of pocket for it, and then was re-imbursed by the insurance as soon as my appeal was approved. Just save your receipts!
It was an emergency. Couldn't contact the doctor.

I still don't know the error.

Simply put. The numbers matched, but the prescription went to the WRONG insurance company. Actually, the state of Washington Medicaid program.

They denied my prescription, instead of saying that I was NOT a Medicaid client and the prescription was sent to them by mistake.

I did file a complaint with the State of Washington Insurance Commissioner this afternoon and they will file a complaint against the state of Washington!!!

The Insurance Commissioner office was concerned since it could easily result in a person dying due to clerical error.

There was a recent article where an insurance company had ONE insurance company doctor DENY 600,000 claims and prescriptions in one year. Do the math on the number of claims denied by per minute worked.

The policy was that YOU as the client would file an appeal or pay cash for the treatment or prescription, if you didn't die before that time, and they would allow the claim.

They were transferring the cost to you, in spite of your insurance.

This is what I thought I was dealing with when I started this journey.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2023, 04:33 PM
 
Location: Baltimore, MD
5,328 posts, read 6,014,984 times
Reputation: 10958
I take notes during the conversation. The notes would be admissible in judicial proceedings. However, for those that function in the gray zone, one could use a cell phone in speaker mode and place a recorder nearby to fill in any gaps that you may have missed in your note-taking. Alternatively, you could place the call on speaker and have a family member sitting by to take notes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2023, 04:33 PM
509 509 started this thread
 
6,321 posts, read 7,040,053 times
Reputation: 9444
Quote:
Originally Posted by lpc123 View Post
The article OP posted does not actually list the states that require 2 party consent. There are 11 states that require both parties to agree: California, Delaware, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, and Washington. All others do not have a 2-party consent requirement.


Also, the article only addressed Iphones. Apps on devices with Android 9 and earlier should still be able to record phone calls without bumping into Google’s latest restrictions. But apps on phones with Android 10 or higher that try to use the accessibility service may run afoul of Google’s new policy.


https://www.pcmag.com/how-to/record-...-android-phone
There is link in the article:

https://www.justia.com/50-state-surv...conversations/

I don't know what is correct.

I don't think there is downside dealing with corporations to tell them you are recording the call. Otherwise, I suspect if you got to legal proceedings it might be thrown out of court, but I am not a lawyer.

The Iphone on speaker and my IPAD on Voice Recording worked perfectly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2023, 06:04 AM
 
Location: SW Corner of CT
2,706 posts, read 3,376,770 times
Reputation: 3646
Body shop working on my truck had correspondences via email with USAA, and when they would change thier story, the body shop would respond with the original email as documentation as to what the insurance company originally agreed to. When they say "This phone call may be recorded for training purposes", don't think that you, the customer, will be able to obtain that recording, it is thier property.......document, document, document.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2023, 07:20 AM
 
Location: North Carolina
3,053 posts, read 2,030,049 times
Reputation: 11338
Yesterday my husband spent 2 hours on phone trying to get estimate for charges he'd pay for a colonoscopy, he's on Medicare with a supplement plan. I told him to request a written estimate because they won't stand by anything he "misunderstood" on a phone call. He's still trying to find out that $ amount.

My last colonoscopy had a $1k charge added from the anesthesiologist that I was given no heads up about when I asked about my share of cost well in advance of scheduling, pre-Medicare age. Should be illegal not to give everyone a full explanation of fees they will be charged based on their insurance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top