Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Rhode Island
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-25-2015, 09:29 AM
 
23,551 posts, read 18,651,084 times
Reputation: 10804

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlfieBoy View Post
Really? Really? Which statistics am I not understanding? Why don't you 'splain them because it is quite apparent the MOST people work.

Man up and admit you got that wrong.
Divide 38,000 by 88,000, and tell me if it is greater than .5 or less than .5. Let me know if you need help.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-25-2015, 09:31 AM
 
23,551 posts, read 18,651,084 times
Reputation: 10804
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raiderman View Post
As of February, it has gone up to 10.8% according to the BLS. And yes, true unemployment is higher, but you need to carry that across the board to EVERY city. For instance, you want to tack on approx 40% more to the unemployment number to make it a majority. Does that mean in places like Seekonk, for instance, where it shows a 3% unemployment rate, the true number is 43%?
Not that simple. You have to take into account the number of people totally out of the labor force, like people on disability (notoriously high in Fall River). It varies enormousy from town to town.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2015, 09:31 AM
 
Location: Henderson, NV
5,314 posts, read 7,780,695 times
Reputation: 3568
Quote:
Originally Posted by massnative71 View Post
Divide 38,000 by 88,000, and tell me if it is greater than .5 or less than .5. Let me know if you need help.
Nowhere does it say 38,000 are unemployed. Rather, as of February 2015, 10% are unemployed. That is around 9,000 people. Granted, as we all know, there are more who have stopped looking, etc. But are there almost 30,000 more? I find that hard to believe that the numbers are that far off. If that was the case, than it probably holds true nationally, and we have 150,000,000 people out of work instead of 30,000,000.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2015, 09:40 AM
 
Location: College Hill
2,903 posts, read 3,454,820 times
Reputation: 1803
Quote:
Originally Posted by massnative71 View Post
Divide 38,000 by 88,000, and tell me if it is greater than .5 or less than .5. Let me know if you need help.

LOL! You can't even manage simple math!! Where were you educated? And you complain bout RI schools? The brass, man, the brass.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2015, 09:40 AM
 
23,551 posts, read 18,651,084 times
Reputation: 10804
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raiderman View Post
As of February, it has gone up to 10.8% according to the BLS. And yes, true unemployment is higher, but you need to carry that across the board to EVERY city. For instance, you want to tack on approx 40% more to the unemployment number to make it a majority. Does that mean in places like Seekonk, for instance, where it shows a 3% unemployment rate, the true number is 43%?
Figure it out from here:


Percentage of workers working in this county: 79.0%
Number of people working at home: 374 (1.0% of all workers)
Daytime population change due to commuting: +1,884 (+2.0%)
Workers who live and work in this city: 20,524 (52.8%)[LEFT]
Read more: //www.city-data.com/work/work-F...#ixzz3bAJT0QMd
[/LEFT]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2015, 09:42 AM
 
23,551 posts, read 18,651,084 times
Reputation: 10804
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlfieBoy View Post
LOL! You can't even manage simple math!! Where were you educated? And you complain bout RI schools? The brass, man, the brass.
I'm waiting...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2015, 09:49 AM
 
Location: Henderson, NV
5,314 posts, read 7,780,695 times
Reputation: 3568
Quote:
Originally Posted by massnative71 View Post
Figure it out from here:


Percentage of workers working in this county: 79.0%
Number of people working at home: 374 (1.0% of all workers)
Daytime population change due to commuting: +1,884 (+2.0%)
Workers who live and work in this city: 20,524 (52.8%)[LEFT]
Read more: //www.city-data.com/work/work-F...#ixzz3bAJT0QMd
[/LEFT]
The numbers still don't jive. C-D is contradicting itself. It says that roughly 10% are unemployed, yet shows your number of 38,000 or so a few times in the data. I am assuming that those 38,000 live AND work in Fall River? Based on the first line, 79% of Fall River residents work in the county. That alone is more than the 38,000 referenced below.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2015, 09:52 AM
 
120 posts, read 235,083 times
Reputation: 109
While actual unemployment may be hire (e.g. people who have stopped looking for work but are able bodied), the big problem with this train of thought is that not everyone is available to work, even if they wanted to, e.g. a five year old or an elderly retiree.

Quote:
Originally Posted by massnative71 View Post
Yes. According to C-D, around 38,000 in F-R are employed. Out of a city of 88,000, that is clearly < 50%.

Remember, that 38,000 included both FT ad PT. Pretty scary, but if you've ever visited the city this would not surprise you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2015, 09:55 AM
 
23,551 posts, read 18,651,084 times
Reputation: 10804
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raiderman View Post
The numbers still don't jive. C-D is contradicting itself. It says that roughly 10% are unemployed, yet shows your number of 38,000 or so a few times in the data. I am assuming that those 38,000 live AND work in Fall River? Based on the first line, 79% of Fall River residents work in the county. That alone is more than the 38,000 referenced below.
That is not what it says.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2015, 09:56 AM
 
23,551 posts, read 18,651,084 times
Reputation: 10804
Quote:
Originally Posted by Juicy J View Post
While actual unemployment may be hire (e.g. people who have stopped looking for work but are able bodied), the big problem with this train of thought is that not everyone is available to work, even if they wanted to, e.g. a five year old or an elderly retiree.

But when talking about whether the majority in the city work (or not), it is very cut and dry.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:



Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Rhode Island

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:28 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top