Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Rhode Island
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-13-2019, 08:26 PM
 
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,936 posts, read 37,041,955 times
Reputation: 40635

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoffD View Post
On my soapbox on this topic.....


Administering the safety net at the state level has totally killed labor mobility for the poor. You can't move to a place with better economic opportunity because you're nailed to the ground by the social services you'd lose if you moved.
It was part of the intention. Just like border control is now. The powers that be want capital to flow freely to where its best utilized, they want raw material to do likewise... heck, that's part of the premise of the invisible hand at its core. They do not want labor to do likewise because by restricting it, it restricts wages and secures more $ for the elite.

Totally the plan of the ruling class.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-13-2019, 08:36 PM
 
23,738 posts, read 18,846,573 times
Reputation: 10878
Quote:
Originally Posted by timberline742 View Post
It was part of the intention. Just like border control is now. The powers that be want capital to flow freely to where its best utilized, they want raw material to do likewise... heck, that's part of the premise of the invisible hand at its core. They do not want labor to do likewise because by restricting it, it restricts wages and secures more $ for the elite.

Totally the plan of the ruling class.
Yep, just another big right wing conspiracy...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2019, 08:09 AM
 
4,236 posts, read 1,690,018 times
Reputation: 1775
Quote:
Originally Posted by timberline742 View Post
It was part of the intention. Just like border control is now. The powers that be want capital to flow freely to where its best utilized, they want raw material to do likewise... heck, that's part of the premise of the invisible hand at its core. They do not want labor to do likewise because by restricting it, it restricts wages and secures more $ for the elite.

Totally the plan of the ruling class.
Maybe it just seems that way to you in Rhode Island.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2019, 08:11 AM
 
Location: Pawtucket, RI
2,811 posts, read 2,191,031 times
Reputation: 1724
The City isn't "sending" homeless anywhere. The program allows eligible recipients to locate wherever they choose, including within New York City. https://www1.nyc.gov/site/hra/help/sota.page
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2019, 08:29 AM
 
14,041 posts, read 15,076,167 times
Reputation: 10503
Quote:
Originally Posted by massnative71 View Post
Eh, you are way oversimplifying things here. Sure there is this romantic image of the illegal who works 4 jobs "Americans won't do" while paying taxes and receiving nothing, but fact is many (especially when you factor in their families) receive more in benefits than they return to our country. A lot of their income is transferred back to their home countries. Many are criminals (and not just talking immigration).


In turn, we have the image of "homeless" being some helpless unemployable strung out PTSD "vet" standing on a street corner. Again, not always (or even usually) so. These people being relocated appear to be families. We don't know their full story. Especially in big expensive cities like NYC, many "working folk" wind up homeless. I know it's hard to imagine from your Jamestown abode, but...


A little OT, but just to clarify.
That’s literally blatantly false
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2019, 11:11 AM
 
Location: Beautiful Rhode Island
9,323 posts, read 14,945,768 times
Reputation: 10458
Quote:
Originally Posted by timberline742 View Post

That said, this has been going on all across America for decades. There have been some good journalism on it, and a few studies. Rural areas shipping "undesirables" to their community to big cities, and cities shuffling them to other cities. Nothing new. Heck, some shelters (such as one in Key West) give one way tickets but with it comes with the string that the person is not allowed to come back ever. It's privately funded by businesses wanting "riff raff" out of the community.

City governments as well have been funding these practices since colonial times. If an indigent showed up in a town where they did "not belong"- (hadn't been previously living) the local colonial town council council would give a "warnings out" so they would not become a charge on the town. This meant they had to leave town by a certain date.


The likely reason that NYC gives a year's rent is so the individual can establish residency. If RI changed its residency to 3 years (or something) absolute proof of residency, it could avoid some liability. Our unemployment rate is at the national average, so anyone who wants to work can, unless they are in need of institutionalization. One of the biggest debacles arising out of the 1960s "reformation" was getting rid of mental hospitals and facilities for the poor like poor farms. Now every city has homeless on the streets. The 1960s "reforms" destroyed the public educational system as well IMO... but that's off topic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2019, 11:29 AM
 
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,936 posts, read 37,041,955 times
Reputation: 40635
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollytree View Post
City governments as well have been funding these practices since colonial times. If an indigent showed up in a town where they did "not belong"- (hadn't been previously living) the local colonial town council council would give a "warnings out" so they would not become a charge on the town. This meant they had to leave town by a certain date.


The likely reason that NYC gives a year's rent is so the individual can establish residency. If RI changed its residency to 3 years (or something) absolute proof of residency, it could avoid some liability. Our unemployment rate is at the national average, so anyone who wants to work can, unless they are in need of institutionalization. One of the biggest debacles arising out of the 1960s "reformation" was getting rid of mental hospitals and facilities for the poor like poor farms. Now every city has homeless on the streets. The 1960s "reforms" destroyed the public educational system as well IMO... but that's off topic.


Yeah, absolutely nothing new. Which was kind of my point.


If we got rid of this shell game between the states in all areas... undercutting each other for business, for benefits, to dump our problems on each other, and instead competed by raising the bar, it would be a far better country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2019, 12:28 PM
 
23,738 posts, read 18,846,573 times
Reputation: 10878
Quote:
Originally Posted by btownboss4 View Post
That’s literally blatantly false
What is?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2019, 12:33 PM
 
23,738 posts, read 18,846,573 times
Reputation: 10878
Quote:
Originally Posted by mp775 View Post
The City isn't "sending" homeless anywhere. The program allows eligible recipients to locate wherever they choose, including within New York City. https://www1.nyc.gov/site/hra/help/sota.page
Question # 1 would be "Is the city paying for it?". If the answer is in any way "yes", they yes they would be effectively "sending" them wherever.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2019, 05:52 AM
 
24,573 posts, read 18,336,806 times
Reputation: 40276
Quote:
Originally Posted by btownboss4 View Post
That’s literally blatantly false

I heard it on Angry White Man Radio. It must be true.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Rhode Island

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:56 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top