Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Sacramento
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-15-2008, 06:45 AM
 
Location: Macao
16,259 posts, read 43,206,193 times
Reputation: 10258

Advertisements

I read this reference about 4 times in the 'what's sac like for an A-A thread'.

Where is this reference coming from? I've never heard that before? I would think of New York City, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, Chicago, etc. But I wouldn't think of Sacramento as in the same league.

Has it just changed significantly recently, or are the newspapers just touting the recent changes and making it sound more than it actually is? What's the story here?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-15-2008, 10:30 AM
 
2,652 posts, read 8,583,766 times
Reputation: 1915
I doubt it. Just using City-Data stats alone says otherwise. Diverse is when you have lots of people from everywhere. Some people say diverse is when there are less white people, but that's not really diverse. If there are 90% asians, and 10% whites that's only two categories of peoples. Not saying Sac is that, but that's an example.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2008, 11:36 AM
 
8,673 posts, read 17,285,320 times
Reputation: 4685
Here's the link to the story in Time Magazine--"Welcome to America's Most Diverse City"

Welcome to America's Most Diverse City - TIME

They cite a Harvard study, but I haven't been able to find it.

Here's the demographics from Wikipedia:

The racial makeup of the city is 48.29% White, 15.47% African American, 1.30% Native American, 16.62% Asian, 0.95% Pacific Islander, 10.96% from other races, and 6.41% from two or more races. 21.61% of the population are Hispanic or Latino of any race.

Sacramento has always been a diverse place. As with any part of the United States that used to be Mexico, we have always had a significant Latino population. The Gold Rush drew people from all over the world, including African Americans, Chinese and people from every place else around the globe. We had significant Japanese and Chinese neighborhoods downtown, just two of many ethnic neighborhoods. Most of Sacramento's postwar growth was in its suburbs, and the population of those suburbs was disproportionately white (due to racial exclusion laws), which is kind of where Sacramento got its "white bread" reputation. Happily, we never actually lived up to that reputation.

Last edited by wburg; 05-15-2008 at 01:03 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2008, 04:19 PM
 
Location: Sacramento
60 posts, read 207,467 times
Reputation: 38
And I assume that the "White" category includes the many Eastern European immigrants and those from the former USSR. There is a significant Russian and Ukranian population here, in 2001 they accounted for about 4% of the total population and doubtless it's higher now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2008, 05:41 PM
 
8,673 posts, read 17,285,320 times
Reputation: 4685
Sacramentan: That "White" category also includes most of the Hispanic/Latino population (at least according to the way HUD gathers information) as well as those from the Middle East.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2008, 09:23 PM
 
Location: Macao
16,259 posts, read 43,206,193 times
Reputation: 10258
Quote:
Originally Posted by wburg View Post
Here's the link to the story in Time Magazine--"Welcome to America's Most Diverse City"

Welcome to America's Most Diverse City - TIME
Good article.

I use to live in San Francisco for a year (2002), and people just couldnt afford living in the Bay Area anymore. I remember a lot of people opted for Sacramento just so they could be near SF even if they couldn't afford it anymore.

I can't help but most of what is making Sacramento what it is now, is from what happened to S.F.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2008, 11:55 PM
 
8,673 posts, read 17,285,320 times
Reputation: 4685
I'd beg to differ on that point. This was already a pretty great city before the dot-com crash and Bay Area transplants started arriving, people just hadn't noticed it.

Last edited by wburg; 05-16-2008 at 12:19 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Sacramento

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:21 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top