Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Sacramento
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-19-2008, 02:03 PM
 
Location: carmichael
1 posts, read 972 times
Reputation: 10

Advertisements

When my wife and I started looking for a new house/neighboorhood to buy 4 years ago, we looked almost exclusively in Carmichael. A lot of the areas here are established owners and keep their properties up very well. The thing that steered us away from areas like Elk Grove, Natomas, and Roseville was the crackerbox, no-elbowroom way they built the houses in those places. Plus the proximity of South Sac to Elk Grove and Del Paso to Natomas.

We have absolutely no regrets about buying in Carmichael. Our area is extremely quiet - almost spooky quiet. We have over twice the land that you'll find in most neighborhoods now. And all the neighbors are very nice. Plus with Carmichael being land locked, you don't really have to worry about the sprawl the other places have experienced.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-06-2008, 11:43 PM
 
141 posts, read 646,619 times
Reputation: 84
I was just actually in Texas and in the Arlington / Dallas area.. I have to say the people / crime there I think are going to be less than Sacramento itself as the urban areas of Texas seemed safer to me than those in California. I understand the people being different as Texas seemed "southern" to me which I guess it is. Anyways I would recommend the foothills of Sacramento, I have been to Citrus Heights recently and I think coming from Arlington you would find this to be a bad area. As for your comment on "northern California not being what you remember" I'm afraid you are very right about this.. I am only 23 years old and can remember back when the area where I grew up was very different, it seems that for whatever reason Nor Cal has become a magnet for low lifes and criminals (of course there are still plenty of decent people too). The thing I didn't like about Texas was that there seemed to be almost no outdoor recreation.. no mountains, not even hills in most areas, kind of boring landscape so I can see why it could get old at least if you like the outdoors. Two areas I have looked at that you may want to consider would be Colorado or the Pacific Northwest which aren't hot and humid like Texas but they have more extreme weather than California.

Sort of off topic but I think California is becoming another "east coast" its going to just get worse and worse as the metropolitan areas grow and the "rat race" here is getting pretty bad, I'm afraid that the secret is out about the good it has to offer as far as the weather, etc but I just don't see the future for the state being that great.

Last edited by rickca; 10-06-2008 at 11:52 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Sacramento

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top