Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > San Antonio
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-16-2013, 10:39 AM
 
500 posts, read 969,312 times
Reputation: 400

Advertisements

I would second Kerrville area as well. Even more pretty than directly north of SA. And unless you shell out millions for a ranch, you're probably not likely to have a creek or river running "through" your property. Can't speak for Kerrville, but in my area, land goes for around 40k/acre in the 3-20 acre neighborhoods. Double that price if you want to live on the river.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-16-2013, 11:50 AM
 
5 posts, read 16,540 times
Reputation: 11
Really? I've been talking to a realtor and looking online and property for about 10 acres (I currently live on 3 and want more lol) around kerville is about $150k which is about 50k under my budget.

It's kinda depressing thinking you can get 40 acres in colorado for $50k
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2013, 12:35 PM
 
500 posts, read 969,312 times
Reputation: 400
Like I said, can't speak to the Kerrville area. I live north of SA about 12 miles from loop 1604 in San Antonio. Much closer. Prices like you are quoting is what we saw 20 years ago in this area. Prices had been around 60K per acre prior to 2008, before the downturn. They have settled to around 40K and are on the uptrend. Like I said, good time to buy.

I honestly didn't think you could find that kind of price around Kerrville either though, at least in the semi-improved neighborhoods with decent roads. That pricing sounds very reasonable for land only an hour away from SA, and certainly worth a visit to investigate.

As far as Colorado goes, my sister has a second home there that lost 70% of it's value in recent years. I'm sure most of the state got hit pretty hard in the recreational areas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2013, 07:34 PM
 
5,642 posts, read 15,709,092 times
Reputation: 2758
I paid about $120k for 7 acres with oaks, hills and a river near the LBJ ranch in Stonewall, Tx in 2010. A few years later I asked the landowner next to me if they would sell me about 2 more acres and I bought that, as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2013, 07:45 PM
 
Location: plano
7,887 posts, read 11,407,065 times
Reputation: 7798
God made Tx hot in the summer so we wouldnt get too crowded with people.......we can handle the cost for the benefit.The biggest long term issue in hill country to me is water as is the case in most of the west and midwest.

Comfort is about as pretty as hill country can get. The pictures above summarize panhandle vs hill country pretty well. I wonder some about oak decline too in the hill country as the hills and trees contribute significantly to its beauty to me.

Good luck and welcome to Tx
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2013, 10:27 PM
 
Location: Central Texas
578 posts, read 1,227,784 times
Reputation: 776
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnhw2 View Post
.........The biggest long term issue in hill country to me is water as is the case in most of the west and midwest.
Very true! But even so, there are some areas of the Hill Country that can hold their own in regards to water supply. While I'm not in the market to buy land in the Hill Country since my family already owns a sufficient amount, this would be my top priority in my search for land, water availability. Every county has areas that are better than other sections, but on a whole I would be skeptical about buying land (relying on a well) in Travis, Hays, Comal, Bexar, Kendall, Bandera, Llano and Blanco Counties. Mason, Gillespie, Kerr, Kimble, and Real are in a better position, but as stated previously even these counties have some "bad" areas. Finding a driller that isn't out to just make a buck and actually knows about the aquifer is also important.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2013, 02:40 PM
 
500 posts, read 969,312 times
Reputation: 400
It has been my experience that the reputable drillers in my area are the experts in terms of aquifer composition and yield. They can tell you within 20' which tributary lies at a particular depth.

I guess there are drillers out there who are less scrupulous, I've just not run into any.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > San Antonio
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:45 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top