Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > San Antonio
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-24-2015, 01:14 PM
 
Location: San Antonio. Tx 78209
2,649 posts, read 7,440,762 times
Reputation: 1769

Advertisements

I love the double talk coming from some people. "Teens need to respect all authority" "um the coach in authority told them to do it". "Teens need to know when to act independently and stand up for themselves!" You can't have it both ways.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-24-2015, 05:11 PM
 
4,845 posts, read 3,272,992 times
Reputation: 9461
Now that reports are out that the principal met with the head coach in his car after the game that night and everyone knew THEN that the assistant coach told the boys to do it, I'm even more disappointed in the way the whole thing was handled. Or not handled, as the case may be. For this story to come out two weeks after the fact is shameful. I've felt all along they should've fired the assistant immediately, and the head coach should've resigned on his own because he's clearly not in control of his program. And now I think the principal needs to go because he knew all along and sat on it. And if they were 'advised' to keep quiet by someone in the district, THOSE people need to go.

This story has gotten a whole lot of press... and not a bit of it speaks well of San Antonio.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-24-2015, 05:58 PM
 
14,637 posts, read 35,032,679 times
Reputation: 6683
I read this afternoon that he's now recanting that statement.

UIL hearing: Jay assistant resigns, must face board to coach in Texas
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2015, 01:11 AM
 
Location: San Antonio
7,629 posts, read 16,455,013 times
Reputation: 18770
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seguinite View Post
Now that reports are out that the principal met with the head coach in his car after the game that night and everyone knew THEN that the assistant coach told the boys to do it, I'm even more disappointed in the way the whole thing was handled. Or not handled, as the case may be. For this story to come out two weeks after the fact is shameful. I've felt all along they should've fired the assistant immediately, and the head coach should've resigned on his own because he's clearly not in control of his program. And now I think the principal needs to go because he knew all along and sat on it. And if they were 'advised' to keep quiet by someone in the district, THOSE people need to go.

This story has gotten a whole lot of press... and not a bit of it speaks well of San Antonio.
^^^^^^^^^ This!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2015, 03:49 AM
 
7,005 posts, read 12,475,795 times
Reputation: 5480
The Supreme Court has determined that juveniles shouldn't face certain punishments, such as the death penalty, because they have reduced culpability. It is a scientific fact that teenagers and young adults do not have the ability to reason at the level of adults around 25 and older. Insurance rates are higher for those under 25 because they are more likely to engage in risky driving and, therefore, get into more accidents. The prefrontal cortex is not fully-developed until the mid-20s. Does that mean that they shouldn't be punished? No. Does that mean that they are less culpable than adults? Yes.

Statutory rape laws are also based on the fact that juveniles cannot reason at the level of adults. Legally, they are seen as not being able to give consent when involved in sexual relationships with adults because they don't have the same mental capacity and can be easily manipulated by someone much older. If it is true that the ref made those types of comments, then I wouldn't worry about getting hit like that as a ref because I wouldn't make those types of comments in the first place. In general, when you insult people like that, you lose respect which is a major component of authority figure status.

Also, physical altercations among teenagers are very common.

Quote:
A 1999 national survey of high school students found that in the past year:

More than 1 in 3 students had been in a physical fight;
About 1 in 7 had been in a physical fight on school property; and
About 1 in 9 of those who fought had been hurt badly enough to need medical treatment.1
Physical Fighting Among Teenagers - Student Safety Center

Quote:
Almost half of adolescent males acknowledge they've been in a fight during the previous year.
https://books.google.com/books?id=Kg...fought&f=false

Last edited by L210; 09-25-2015 at 04:10 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2015, 06:07 AM
 
2,295 posts, read 2,368,845 times
Reputation: 2668
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seguinite View Post
Now that reports are out that the principal met with the head coach in his car after the game that night and everyone knew THEN that the assistant coach told the boys to do it, I'm even more disappointed in the way the whole thing was handled. Or not handled, as the case may be. For this story to come out two weeks after the fact is shameful. I've felt all along they should've fired the assistant immediately, and the head coach should've resigned on his own because he's clearly not in control of his program. And now I think the principal needs to go because he knew all along and sat on it. And if they were 'advised' to keep quiet by someone in the district, THOSE people need to go.

This story has gotten a whole lot of press... and not a bit of it speaks well of San Antonio.
Agreed. It's makes a pretty sad statement when the first actions of the adults involved in the situation is to collude to concoct a story to save their own backsides, and, as an after thought, possibly do something to protect the players. The failures in this case are multiple. A coaching staff that created a climate that led to 4 players being ejected from a single game, and 2 players overtly targeting an official. Players trying to use an excuse they were "ordered" to take out the official. Allegations of racial slurs introduced as some form of an excuse. The assistant coach now recanting his earlier admission saying he was concerned about potential punishment for the students, but didn't think his initial statement would be used in an "official" capacity. Paints a pretty bad picture of the climate created by Coach Gutierrez and his staff. Even more sad that school administrators at Jay HS, and Northside ISD staff seem to have gone along with this series of excuses and were very lenient on the two players involved with hitting the official. There have been cases where students guilty of dress code infractions or swearing were given 90 days in the AEP. Northside said they were treating the actions of the 2 players as an assault on a school official. Apparently, in Northside ISD, that only gets you 75 days at the alternative campus, with credit for time served. Bottom line, the coaching staff needs to be replaced. No excuses. The UIL should have ended the season John Jay. The 2 players that hit the ref should never participate in UIL events again. Yes, there were failures with the coaching staff, but the players know better than to attack a game official. It's ridiculous to think otherwise.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2015, 06:12 AM
 
1,175 posts, read 1,437,767 times
Reputation: 1338
Quote:
Originally Posted by L210 View Post
The Supreme Court has determined that juveniles shouldn't face certain punishments, such as the death penalty, because they have reduced culpability. It is a scientific fact that teenagers and young adults do not have the ability to reason at the level of adults around 25 and older. Insurance rates are higher for those under 25 because they are more likely to engage in risky driving and, therefore, get into more accidents. The prefrontal cortex is not fully-developed until the mid-20s. Does that mean that they shouldn't be punished? No. Does that mean that they are less culpable than adults? Yes.

Statutory rape laws are also based on the fact that juveniles cannot reason at the level of adults. Legally, they are seen as not being able to give consent when involved in sexual relationships with adults because they don't have the same mental capacity and can be easily manipulated by someone much older. If it is true that the ref made those types of comments, then I wouldn't worry about getting hit like that as a ref because I wouldn't make those types of comments in the first place. In general, when you insult people like that, you lose respect which is a major component of authority figure status.

Also, physical altercations among teenagers are very common.


Physical Fighting Among Teenagers - Student Safety Center


https://books.google.com/books?id=Kg...fought&f=false
The above and if the coach did in fact tell them to do it, is why I think they should get probation instead of jail time.
I also don't think they should be rewarded by being able to continue to play HS sports. If they want to go to Community College and play football there, and they work hard and get noticed by a 4 year school, more power to them. I think for HS they should be done.

Quote:
Originally Posted by smuboy86 View Post
I love the double talk coming from some people. "Teens need to respect all authority" "um the coach in authority told them to do it". "Teens need to know when to act independently and stand up for themselves!" You can't have it both ways.
I missed where anyone said they should blindly follow any authority figure. There's also a rather large difference between respecting the referee and doing what the assistant coach said when you KNOW it is wrong.
At the risk of sounding like an old codger; personal responsibility is far too rare these days.
Now get off my lawn.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2015, 07:17 AM
 
Location: San Antonio, TX
136 posts, read 225,165 times
Reputation: 119
Quote:
Originally Posted by sapphire View Post
I read this afternoon that he's now recanting that statement.

UIL hearing: Jay assistant resigns, must face board to coach in Texas
Wow, this is getting really dumb. All this guy managed to do was make the situation worse, especially for himself.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2015, 08:13 AM
 
Location: USA
4,434 posts, read 5,347,238 times
Reputation: 4127
Quote:
Originally Posted by L210 View Post
The Supreme Court has determined that juveniles shouldn't face certain punishments, such as the death penalty, because they have reduced culpability. It is a scientific fact that teenagers and young adults do not have the ability to reason at the level of adults around 25 and older. Insurance rates are higher for those under 25 because they are more likely to engage in risky driving and, therefore, get into more accidents. The prefrontal cortex is not fully-developed until the mid-20s. Does that mean that they shouldn't be punished? No. Does that mean that they are less culpable than adults? Yes.

Statutory rape laws are also based on the fact that juveniles cannot reason at the level of adults. Legally, they are seen as not being able to give consent when involved in sexual relationships with adults because they don't have the same mental capacity and can be easily manipulated by someone much older. If it is true that the ref made those types of comments, then I wouldn't worry about getting hit like that as a ref because I wouldn't make those types of comments in the first place. In general, when you insult people like that, you lose respect which is a major component of authority figure status.

Also, physical altercations among teenagers are very common.


Physical Fighting Among Teenagers - Student Safety Center


https://books.google.com/books?id=Kg...fought&f=false
We get it teens are dumb and aggressive to other teens.

How many teens in these studies attack adults?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2015, 09:09 AM
 
6,707 posts, read 8,778,122 times
Reputation: 4866
Quote:
Originally Posted by rynetwo View Post
We get it teens are dumb and aggressive to other teens.

How many teens in these studies attack adults?
Not many teens attack adults and I doubt these two ever did until the coach told them to do so (or not). It was definitely planned between them two at the very least.

It is all getting confusing to me now what really happened and am getting tired of how much publicity this is getting. It is one story I wish that would go away.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > San Antonio
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:05 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top