Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Bernardino and Riverside Counties
 [Register]
San Bernardino and Riverside Counties The Inland Empire
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-28-2016, 01:43 AM
 
Location: Murrieta California
3,038 posts, read 4,777,193 times
Reputation: 2315

Advertisements

Not all of the IE is smoggy. The South Western area, ie Murrieta and Temecula are not smoggy. I like Phoenix having lived there but far prefer the Temecula Valley.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-28-2016, 11:06 AM
 
925 posts, read 1,066,136 times
Reputation: 1547
Most of the IE is not that smoggy anymore. I moved to Upland 25 years ago and didn't see the mountains for months. Now we see the mountains most days of the year even in the summer. 100 percent better than when I moved here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2016, 09:13 PM
 
30,896 posts, read 36,965,098 times
Reputation: 34526
Quote:
Originally Posted by BGS91762 View Post
Most of the IE is not that smoggy anymore. I moved to Upland 25 years ago and didn't see the mountains for months. Now we see the mountains most days of the year even in the summer. 100 percent better than when I moved here.
Yes, it's definitely better than it used to be. But air quality has improved everywhere, and people are creatures of comparison and of the present. They don't care about the air quality 25 years ago. They compare air quality of Place A of today with Place B of today. But you could be right....in another decade it may be a moot point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2016, 09:16 PM
 
30,896 posts, read 36,965,098 times
Reputation: 34526
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sorcerer68 View Post
The trend in real estate development, not only in Los Angeles but nationwide is moving sharply away from car based communities.
That's because U.N. Agenda 21 is being forced on us, as explained here (by a liberal Democrat, I might add). Here is the short version:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipKHqY7uxSg

Here is the more detailed version:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ykELwj1Ta8
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-29-2016, 06:04 PM
 
Location: Laguna Niguel, Orange County CA
9,807 posts, read 11,145,157 times
Reputation: 7997
Quote:
Originally Posted by mysticaltyger View Post
That's because U.N. Agenda 21 is being forced on us, as explained here (by a liberal Democrat, I might add). Here is the short version:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipKHqY7uxSg

Here is the more detailed version:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ykELwj1Ta8
Indeed. Global warming is grossly exaggerated for this reason. Every possible weather pattern and/or even earthquakes are thus blamed on there being too much methane and Co2 in the atmosphere.

In addition, our previous standard of living made others jealous, and, as such, it had to be curtailed. This ties into the "sustainable development" model which makes it easy to surveil us, monitor us, train us (in the correct way of thinking), deliver crumbs to us, all while the elites continue to enjoy all of the amenities previously available in the U.S. A much better model would be to stop immigration and push birth control. We wouldn't need all this darn construction. We know who wants all this darn development.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-29-2016, 07:22 PM
 
30,896 posts, read 36,965,098 times
Reputation: 34526
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuvSouthOC View Post
Indeed. Global warming is grossly exaggerated for this reason. Every possible weather pattern and/or even earthquakes are thus blamed on there being too much methane and Co2 in the atmosphere.

In addition, our previous standard of living made others jealous, and, as such, it had to be curtailed. This ties into the "sustainable development" model which makes it easy to surveil us, monitor us, train us (in the correct way of thinking), deliver crumbs to us, all while the elites continue to enjoy all of the amenities previously available in the U.S. A much better model would be to stop immigration and push birth control. We wouldn't need all this darn construction. We know who wants all this darn development.
That's pretty much what Rosa Koire, the woman in the videos, said. I think she believes in global warming to a degree, but she believes it's being used as a convenient foil for seizing power and control. She talks about how she never buys new clothes and how her partner is a construction contractor and how they built their house out of reused/recycled materials, so I think she has some real credibility. She also talked about how much easier it is to surveil people when they live in densely populated cities.


I also totally agree the elites will live the way they always have, maybe better once they clear people out of rural and suburban areas. Just look at Al Gore as Exhibit A with his 20 room mansion on lots of ground.


I am not against all immigration, although I am against illegal immigration. In general, I think having educated immigrants in America is a good thing. Uneducated immigrants, while not bad people, are not good candidates for immigration. Each country should develop their economies better and take care of their own poor people. As far as birth control goes, the developed countries actually are facing demographic decline. It's the poor countries that have the issue with overpopulation, and even many of them have reduced their birth rates significantly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Bernardino and Riverside Counties
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:17 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top