Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Francisco - Oakland
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-14-2011, 04:50 PM
 
Location: South Korea
5,242 posts, read 13,078,817 times
Reputation: 2958

Advertisements

Notice how I didn't say anything about speed, just convenience in terms of station location and frequency and hours. BART zips along through most subway tunnels but it can slow to a crawl in some parts, like between West Oakland and 12th Street Oakland.

I like riding Caltrain, I just hate dealing with how its stations dump you in the middle of nowhere. The Baby Bullet trains are great (especially if you aren't riding anywhere south of Palo Alto which is only 35 minutes from SF IIRC) but they don't run that often and the non-bullet trains have so many stops that they take a long time to get from A to Z.

If you lived by the ballpark and your job was say right next to the Palo Alto station, it would be great. The trains are comfortable and clean, the train is almost always on time (unless it hits someone) and one thing I always liked about it was that you can drink beer on it...last time I rode it south from SF they had a concession stand at 4th and King where you could get beer and popcorn etc...hope they still have that, very nice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-14-2011, 05:01 PM
 
Location: Oakland, CA
28,226 posts, read 36,876,599 times
Reputation: 28563
For me frequency will always trump comfort. And BART isn't too expensive as long as you can avoid the San Mateo County tax or originating on the end of the line.

Planning around caltrain is very difficult if you have any variance in work hours.

I do frequent the train (amtrak) to visit my parents to avoid the hassle and traffic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2011, 05:15 PM
 
10,920 posts, read 6,910,517 times
Reputation: 4942
Quote:
Originally Posted by mayorhaggar View Post
Notice how I didn't say anything about speed, just convenience in terms of station location and frequency and hours. BART zips along through most subway tunnels but it can slow to a crawl in some parts, like between West Oakland and 12th Street Oakland.

I like riding Caltrain, I just hate dealing with how its stations dump you in the middle of nowhere. The Baby Bullet trains are great (especially if you aren't riding anywhere south of Palo Alto which is only 35 minutes from SF IIRC) but they don't run that often and the non-bullet trains have so many stops that they take a long time to get from A to Z.

If you lived by the ballpark and your job was say right next to the Palo Alto station, it would be great. The trains are comfortable and clean, the train is almost always on time (unless it hits someone) and one thing I always liked about it was that you can drink beer on it...last time I rode it south from SF they had a concession stand at 4th and King where you could get beer and popcorn etc...hope they still have that, very nice.
Yea, I don't disagree with what you're saying. A lot of Caltrain's stations are kind of not near much, especially in the some of the northern peninsula cities (South SF, San Bruno, Milbrae). And the off-peak local trains definitely are a huge pain (since they stop at every station) if you have to go more than a few stops away.

Caltrain does work well for me because I live in San Mateo and take it to Palo Alto (Stanford). But for others, it's probably a lot less convenient because of its crappy off-peak schedule and its poor station locations (4th and King isn't that close (walking distance) to the SF employment centers).

I guess my point was more theoretical in nature. If one had to pick between them (assuming where you wanted to go was near a station of either), I'd choose Caltrain because of its peak-hour commute speed, cost, ability to take bikes on during commute hours, and comfort. BART isn't that bad...I'd just prefer Caltrain if I was asked to make a choice between them.

But in real life, there isn't really an option between them because they run for the most part in completely different areas. And if you don't live/work on the peninsula, then it obviously isn't even a choice, as BART is your only option.

Overall, I've found all of the bay area transit agencies to be very hit and miss...That is, there's always some negative. (this one is more expensive, or this one is never on time, or this one costs X billions to extend service to some other city...). I guess that's just the side effect of the multi-nodal nature of the area, and many municipalities wanting to have their own separate service. Don't expect the seamless experience of many east coast cities...

But I'm taking this thread off-topic. I'm sorry OP...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2011, 10:28 PM
 
Location: San Jose, CA
7,688 posts, read 29,154,335 times
Reputation: 3631
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmiller91 View Post
I should add, my husband likes to jump on his bike and ride when he's bored. Are most neighborhoods suited for that type of activity or does congestion make it impossible?
The upper peninsula is not too congested, there are some busy roads in Daly City but the more affordable area by the coast is pretty quiet. Safe too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2011, 07:42 PM
 
Location: Madison, WI
230 posts, read 408,949 times
Reputation: 69
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonarrat View Post
The upper peninsula is not too congested, there are some busy roads in Daly City but the more affordable area by the coast is pretty quiet. Safe too.
Why is the area near the coast affordable? Is it the distance to public transportation, or ???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-15-2011, 07:56 PM
 
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
1,482 posts, read 5,174,271 times
Reputation: 798
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmiller91 View Post
Why is the area near the coast affordable? Is it the distance to public transportation, or ???
It's the coldest, wettest area and has essentially no coastal access because there isn't much of a beach below the cliffs the neighborhood sits above.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2011, 07:00 AM
 
Location: San Jose, CA
7,688 posts, read 29,154,335 times
Reputation: 3631
Quote:
Originally Posted by ImRandy View Post
It's the coldest, wettest area and has essentially no coastal access because there isn't much of a beach below the cliffs the neighborhood sits above.
It's also the darkest and windiest area. Many days the fog is so persistent, you never see the sun at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2011, 02:19 PM
 
Location: Madison, WI
230 posts, read 408,949 times
Reputation: 69
wow, important points. So southern peninsula... like Daly City = less fog and more sun?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2011, 10:07 PM
 
Location: San Jose, CA
7,688 posts, read 29,154,335 times
Reputation: 3631
Daly City, South San Francisco, Brisbane, San Bruno, Pacifica are north peninsula. Generally south of there it's warmer and sunnier, but you're not going to find many houses for $400K.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2011, 10:38 PM
 
Location: South Korea
5,242 posts, read 13,078,817 times
Reputation: 2958
It really only depends on whether you're at the coast or not. There's a mountain range down the peninsula. If you're east of that range, you get sunnier, warmer weather, because the mountains keep back the foggy weather. So towns along the bay like San Mateo and Redwood City and so on are warm and sunny when it's chilly and foggy in Pacifica and Daly City.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Francisco - Oakland
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:06 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top