U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Francisco - Oakland
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-14-2012, 11:03 AM
 
3 posts, read 16,877 times
Reputation: 11

Advertisements

Hey everyone,

My partner and I are moving to the Bay area towards the end of the summer and are looking for help on where to start searching for a place. He's be commuting to Stanford, but is okay with an hour, hour and a half commute. Neither of us has ever been to the Bay area so we're a little overwhelmed with all the neighborhoods to choose from.

We're trying to stay under $1,800 for a 2 bedroom. A rental house with a backyard for a vegetable garden would be ideal. We've also got 3 cats so a tiny little efficiency just isn't gonna cut it. Other stuff we're hoping for: close to BART, low-crime area, friendly locals, close to parks/trails/etc, close to a natural food store or farmers market would be awesome.

Any suggestions would be appreciated! Thanks!
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-14-2012, 12:49 PM
 
13,710 posts, read 8,631,514 times
Reputation: 9834
Finding a house for $1,800 is within range but barely; at least in the nice areas. Most within that range are probably going to be apartments. But anyway, let's start with the closest locations to Stanford:

The area immediately surrounding Palo Alto is probably out of your range (except East Palo Alto, but don't live there). I'd suggest areas just outside of the expensive hoods - Sunnyvale, Santa Clara, San Jose, Fremont, Newark, Union City, Redwood City, Milpitas. You'll find that neighborhoods south of Mountain View tends to be a bit more affordable (and safe). I personally think Sunnyvale and S

Up north, the area between Palo Alto and San Francisco tends to be expensive, with pockets of affordable but less safe area. The exception being Daly City, Colma, Brisbane and South San Francisco; but they're a bit far from Stanford.

If you really want to push that 90 mins commute, try Pleasanton and Dublin. They're newer towns and some people like new.

Even within a town there may be good and bad areas, it's too much to get into them right now. Check them out and if you have questions about a particular location, ask here.

.

Last edited by beb0p; 03-14-2012 at 01:02 PM..
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2012, 01:22 PM
 
Location: A bit further north than before
1,648 posts, read 3,552,289 times
Reputation: 1464
Why would you condemn yourself to 2-3 hours a day commuting? You're going to be exhausted and stressed and not be able to take advantage of the resources here.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2012, 01:26 PM
 
3 posts, read 16,877 times
Reputation: 11
He'll only need to be on campus one day a week, so it won't be so bad. We'd like to be close enough to San Francisco so that it's not a hassle to go into the city.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2012, 01:47 PM
 
10,921 posts, read 6,492,628 times
Reputation: 4941
Quote:
Originally Posted by veggieheaven View Post
He'll only need to be on campus one day a week, so it won't be so bad. We'd like to be close enough to San Francisco so that it's not a hassle to go into the city.
I'd recommend some of the penninsula cities (for close access to the city, near BART, more affordable than SF, still close to Stanford, mostly very safe). The ones that I would include would be (from north to south) South San Francisco, San Bruno, Milbrae, Burlingame, San Mateo, San Carlos, Redwood City.

Of these, South San Francisco and San Bruno are my least favorite, but they're still generally safe. A general rule is the more west, the better the area. Downtown Burlingame, San Mateo, and Redwood City are all pretty nice, and living near those puts you near Caltrain, and near nice and walkable downtowns. BART ends south of Milbrae, but Caltrain connects to BART in Milbrae. Caltrain is also an option for getting into the city, and if he's an employee at Stanford, he gets a free Caltrain pass (good perk).

The only concern I'd have is your ability to find a 2-bedroom for 1,800 (which, frankly, is pushing it for any area of the bay area these days...). But, there are definitely some (I see some on paddmapper, that's a good resource for mapping things out).

If you opt not to live in the peninsula between Stanford and the City, I'd recommend looking at some of the towns south of Palo Alto (Sunnyvale, Santa Clara) as these will be more affordable than Palo Alto and are just as safe (for the most part). Keep in mind, the further south you go, the further you are from SF (not sure how important being near the city is on your priority list).

I'd also look at some of the East Bay areas just on the other side of the Dumbarton bridge. Fremont and Newark in particular are pretty nice, near BART, and are not that far from Stanford (just across the bridge). There is even a public transit option (http://transportation.stanford.edu/a...it.shtml#lineu). You'll also find the east bay is more affordable, so your money will go further for housing. The downside is you have to cross a bridge to get to Stanford (but only once a week isn't bad), and you are a bit further from SF.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2012, 02:07 PM
 
Location: South Korea
5,242 posts, read 12,640,929 times
Reputation: 2954
You're probably looking at having to get an apartment, maybe a townhouse around Fremont/Union City etc. Also landlords are really anti-pet here though the suburbs are easier than San Francisco for pets.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2012, 02:16 PM
 
Location: Northern California
3,708 posts, read 14,233,828 times
Reputation: 1921
I agree with the above about finding a place in towns such as Millbrae, Burlingame, San Mateo, Belmont, San Carlos or Redwood City. Caltrain stops in all these places and goes into San Francisco. www.caltrain.com/stations/systemmap.html

However, $1800 will be a tight squeeze and having three cats might be a deal breaker or require a hefty deposit.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2012, 04:57 PM
 
13,710 posts, read 8,631,514 times
Reputation: 9834
The Millbrae, Burlingame, San Mateo, Belmont, San Carlos or Redwood City market is very expensive and competitive. If there is a house for rent for $1,800 that is not in the ghetto, it's going to attract a bidding war. By all means look there but I think you'll have better luck in South San Francisco (not to be confused with San Francisco), San Bruno, Daly City, and Brisbane.

Also you may also want to consider living within San Francisco if that's where you want to be. But SF is very anti-pet and the affordable neighborhood tends to be in the foggy area and may be a bit sketchy.

.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2012, 07:36 PM
 
3 posts, read 16,877 times
Reputation: 11
Thanks for all the advice! Also, how soon in advance should we look to sign a lease? I'm used to living in college towns where all the leases start in August, but from what I can tell so far nothing is renting that far in advance. If I want a lease to start September 1st, are we better off looking for a place in August or May (the two months we'd be able to get out there to look for a place)?
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2012, 08:52 PM
 
Location: South Korea
5,242 posts, read 12,640,929 times
Reputation: 2954
Rentals move very fast in the Bay Area, especially in or near SF. You'll want to go to open house viewings about 2 weeks before you'd plan on moving in. A lot of places are already vacant and ready to be moved into the next day. It's not like other parts of the US where landlords spend a month showing a place while the previous tenants moved in, things move that fast. And you can't go see places and then ponder upon them for two weeks then go back and decide to take a place, because it will have already been taken on the day of the viewing by someone else. It's a bit more relaxed in suburban areas, but still more competitive than other parts of the US.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Francisco - Oakland
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2023, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top