Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Francisco - Oakland
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-20-2009, 12:27 AM
 
28,115 posts, read 63,680,034 times
Reputation: 23268

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by bayarea-girl View Post
Ultrarunner, you really think that this is the beginning of more bail-outs to come? I gosh I hope not. Homes falling and rising is not new to CA, this has happened before. People need to just ride this out and buy what they can afford. I didn't know people actually picked banks.

Clongirl, I am so feeling what you are saying and can totally relate. For the life of me I couldn't understand how things were going up so quickly and how people were over bidding like crazy. Even people that I knew who bought a home early, then bought expensive cars and took fabulous vacations, I thought how could they be doing this (until I realized they were taking it out of their homes). Most of the homes that I saw that were over $500K+ when things were "booming" were crap rehabs and were lucky to be over 1000/sq ft. (in any other state those homes wouldn't have gone for more than $50K, if that).

I'll be so happy when things come down to reality.
Other industries are watching and waiting on the sidelines... there are significant financial problems in Health Care... Hospitals are shutting down ER services...

Commercial Real Estate is in line for the next bubble with a lot of high profile retail just hanging on.

Auto/Manufacturing is in the midst of putting together a bail-out...

Don't forget the entire Alternative Energy Industry is lobbying for Subsidies.

Banks in Oakland and SF were the subject of protests under the Community Investment Act... It became serious business for banks to prove they were in compliance... some banks left the Oakland market altogether.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-20-2009, 08:57 AM
 
Location: Oakland, CA
1,554 posts, read 5,290,693 times
Reputation: 713
I did not buy to flip. I honestly did not think it would get this bad any time soon. I also did not over spend. My condo was 399k and most places older in the area were going for that much, I bought a new construction. I couldn't find anything in the bay area for under 400k unless it was falling to pieces. I thought it was a good time to buy.

Most people with homes end up refinancing so to say it's our fault for buying a house is crazy. I never thought i'd see home prices drop this low out here ever. Luckily I qualify for this new home plan Obama is working on since my house is under 417k and worth much less than what I paid. I hope to save a nice amount from this rather than continue to over pay the bank I have the loan from.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2009, 09:26 AM
 
Location: Bay Area
3,980 posts, read 8,989,754 times
Reputation: 4728
I used to be an avid reader of patrick.net. I always did, and still believe that houses MUST come down to the median salary for the area. If you make say, 70k a year, then the house that you are trying to purchase should only be going for around 210k. That's pretty much the size of it... anyone that bought a house for more than 3 times their income overpaid and shouldn't have believed the agents/parents/brokers that you could afford it. Now what fool would go into a Bentley dealership, let the dealer convince you that you deserve the Bentley and tell you you're wealthy enough to afford it? It was never brain science.

I remember when my Fedex delivery guy was trying to convince my husband and I that buying property in Florida was making him a rich man..That's when you KNOW there's a problem with this scenario!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2009, 10:39 AM
 
Location: Oakland, CA
1,554 posts, read 5,290,693 times
Reputation: 713
Quote:
Originally Posted by clongirl View Post
I used to be an avid reader of patrick.net. I always did, and still believe that houses MUST come down to the median salary for the area. If you make say, 70k a year, then the house that you are trying to purchase should only be going for around 210k. That's pretty much the size of it... anyone that bought a house for more than 3 times their income overpaid and shouldn't have believed the agents/parents/brokers that you could afford it. Now what fool would go into a Bentley dealership, let the dealer convince you that you deserve the Bentley and tell you you're wealthy enough to afford it? It was never brain science.

I remember when my Fedex delivery guy was trying to convince my husband and I that buying property in Florida was making him a rich man..That's when you KNOW there's a problem with this scenario!
If houses in the bay area were always relative to salary then the Bay Area would look like Tokyo.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2009, 10:58 AM
 
Location: THE USA
3,257 posts, read 6,128,472 times
Reputation: 1998
I agree with this. I think that irresponsible buyers should not get a bail out. I understand the prices fell and now the house isn't what they thought it was worth, but the bank still paid that previous lucky buyer the full amount when you bought their house. We chose to wait (4 years now) to buy a house because we heard the bubble would pop and just were biding our time until it did. I am not a risk taker.

Aren't the ones in foreclosure the people who did not account for their ARM to go up and bought more house than they could afford? They got used to the intial payment and didn't bother to think about how they would pay once it adjusted.


Quote:
Originally Posted by clongirl View Post
but it kinda pi**es me off that people that bought anything during the "bubble" years around here are getting help now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2009, 12:12 PM
 
28,115 posts, read 63,680,034 times
Reputation: 23268
Quote:
Originally Posted by clongirl View Post
I used to be an avid reader of patrick.net. I always did, and still believe that houses MUST come down to the median salary for the area. If you make say, 70k a year, then the house that you are trying to purchase should only be going for around 210k. That's pretty much the size of it... anyone that bought a house for more than 3 times their income overpaid and shouldn't have believed the agents/parents/brokers that you could afford it. Now what fool would go into a Bentley dealership, let the dealer convince you that you deserve the Bentley and tell you you're wealthy enough to afford it? It was never brain science.

I remember when my Fedex delivery guy was trying to convince my husband and I that buying property in Florida was making him a rich man..That's when you KNOW there's a problem with this scenario!
I was always running up against the 3 x income rule... even recently with Wells Fargo and Chase...

The way around it is to increase your down payment or pay cash...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2009, 01:23 PM
 
3,735 posts, read 8,069,183 times
Reputation: 1944
To add, some peoples theories and what some people tried to convince me of was that the reason why they were buying such expensive homes and why they were in so much debt was because the housing trend would never allow them to buy a home. They never saw themselves paying off their homes, they said that was the old way of doing things. My attorney was happy when I bought my first home as he was making is final payment on his home and I remember him telling me that all of his friends thought he was crazy for paying off his home.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Francisco - Oakland
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:06 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top