Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Francisco - Oakland
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Old 01-29-2010, 09:11 AM
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,625 posts, read 67,123,456 times
Reputation: 21154


Interesting take.

My Word: Cut costs by combining Fremont, Union City, Newark into a new city - Inside Bay Area
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Old 01-29-2010, 12:22 PM
Location: Pleasanton, CA
2,406 posts, read 6,005,852 times
Reputation: 4246
It's never going to happen. They call it the "Tri-City" area for a reason...residents have wanted them to be separate cities. If it was ever going to be one city, it would've been done long ago. Fremont was created from five separate towns. Union City residents wanted to keep their own community separate and intact. Newark did as well, and is completely surrounded by Fremont on all sides. Creating a bigger government entity to control a much larger area of land would probably not fix anything at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 01-29-2010, 12:34 PM
Location: California
37,032 posts, read 41,953,569 times
Reputation: 34834
There are several areas in the Bay Area that are like this; Lamorinda (Lafayette, Moraga, Orinda) and the Tri-Valley (Dublin, Pleasanton, Livermore). Sometimes there are no natural boundries to seperate one city from the other, sometimes it's just a road or a freeway. And with development there can be lots of gray areas when it comes to where one city stops and another starts. I know there have been school districts that cross city boundries before. And some even share public services.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 01-29-2010, 01:46 PM
Location: Northridge, Los Angeles, CA
2,684 posts, read 7,349,385 times
Reputation: 2409
When's the last time any municipality in the Bay Area was willing to give up their autonomy to combine into a bigger entity? I can actually see these already small cities split up into more cities (like Warm Springs and Mission San Jose in Fremont) WAY BEFORE these cities combine.

Can you imagine though? If they combined, they'd have a population nearing Oakland's.

Like I've repeated before, I think regional coordination along the County Level (like NY's boroughs) is the best way of governance, instead of this weird balkanization going on in the Bay Area.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.

Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply

Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Francisco - Oakland
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top