Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Francisco - Oakland
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-14-2010, 10:27 AM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,656 posts, read 67,506,468 times
Reputation: 21239

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Fantastic View Post
As a real estate professional, it's laughable that you would compare the acquisition of Oakland's most prominent business complex to the private funding of a super stadium for a failed baseball team.

That simply shows how misinformed about commercial real estate you truly are.
The only thing that's misinformed and laughable is your shameless lie that the damage from the Meserhle trial totaled $20 Million.

Furthermore, you stated:
Why would rich people want to invest money into a city where the police have basically said "We won't be responding to crimes anymore."

And the answer is, rich people already do invest money in Oakland.

Lots. This is not a debatable point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-14-2010, 10:28 AM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,656 posts, read 67,506,468 times
Reputation: 21239
Furthermore, you are not a real estate professional. You are a racist waiter.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2010, 10:30 AM
 
Location: Mission Viejo, CA / San Rafael, CA
2,352 posts, read 5,252,556 times
Reputation: 539
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
The only thing that's misinformed and laughable is your shameless lie that the damage from the Meserhle trial totaled $20 Million.

Furthermore, you stated:
Why would rich people want to invest money into a city where the police have basically said "We won't be responding to crimes anymore."

And the answer is, rich people already do invest money in Oakland.

Lots. This is not a debatable point.
Yes rich people will invest in office space in Oakland if they can get it under market value, that's called a "bargain."

Last time I checked though, Office complexes don't have the same crowd control issues that baseball stadiums have.

Hmm, that's your queue to go ahead and pick up a book about commercial real estate so you can learn why you're point is laughable and misinformed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2010, 10:38 AM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,656 posts, read 67,506,468 times
Reputation: 21239
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Fantastic View Post
Hmm, that's your queue to go ahead and pick up a book about commercial real estate so you can learn why you're point is laughable and misinformed.
This from the ultimate in armchair experts.

Good one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2010, 10:41 AM
 
205 posts, read 211,289 times
Reputation: 81
This idiot is always wrong, every forum he pollutes hates him also, this guy is the biggest loser i've ever encountered online. I'm wondering when he's going to show us his 20 million in damages source. We are waiting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2010, 10:43 AM
 
Location: Mission Viejo, CA / San Rafael, CA
2,352 posts, read 5,252,556 times
Reputation: 539
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
This from the ultimate in armchair experts.

Good one.
Check and mate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2010, 10:53 AM
 
Location: ABQ
3,771 posts, read 7,092,439 times
Reputation: 4893
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Fantastic View Post
Yes rich people will invest in office space in Oakland if they can get it under market value, that's called a "bargain."

Last time I checked though, Office complexes don't have the same crowd control issues that baseball stadiums have.

Hmm, that's your queue to go ahead and pick up a book about commercial real estate so you can learn why you're point is laughable and misinformed.
1) What crowd control issues have there ever been at an A's game? lol

My guess is that you've never even been to an A's game. Would I be correct? You mentioned a few pages back that everyone's car gets vandalized at the Complex - and they don't, by the way. For Warriors and A's games, I park off-stadium property on San Pablo and walk and I've never even had an issue then. That sort of exemplifies the problem with the A's stadium - it's not that it's in a bad neighborhood, it's that it sits in an area that has absolutely nothing around it.

2) Your Barry Bonds excuse REMAINS uneducated. You know so very little about baseball but want to make bad baseball analogies. The Cleveland Indians went to the world series TWICE, sold out 484 CONSECUTIVE games, won the AL Central title 8 or 9 straight times and had stars - Jim Thome, Albert Belle, Manny Ramirez, Roberto Alomar, etc, but do you know what they're drawing now? A lower attendance than the Oakland Athletics.

SF isn't drawing 35,000 a game because they used to have Barry Bonds and went to a world series once in a decade - they're going because the team is not awful, they have an easy-access park that's worth going to. They are quite similar to the A's in the fact that before they got those amenities, no one showed up. IN FACT, The A's have better attendance than the Giants did in the same situation!

You are wholly uneducated on baseball.

3) When are you going to respond to two lies you blatantly posted in this thread?

a. The riots caused 20 million in damage
b. 25,000 seats = 75% of Candlesticks capacity

All you do is make up your own statistics for whatever argument you need lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2010, 10:54 AM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,656 posts, read 67,506,468 times
Reputation: 21239
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Fantastic View Post
Check and mate.
sounds like I hit a sore spot.

Don't worry, Im sure somebody takes you seriously.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2010, 11:33 AM
 
Location: Mission Viejo, CA / San Rafael, CA
2,352 posts, read 5,252,556 times
Reputation: 539
I think the Oakland crew has finally stopped addressing the main points at hand:

1) Oakland has the highest crime rate in California
2) Because of #1, no one will invest into the JLS Stadium project.
3) Because of not being able to accept #1 and #2, Oakland has plenty of problems ahead in the near and far future.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2010, 11:38 AM
 
205 posts, read 211,289 times
Reputation: 81
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Fantastic View Post
I think the Oakland crew has finally stopped addressing the main points at hand:
Say's the loser who kept bringing up 20 Million in Damages.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Francisco - Oakland
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:02 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top