Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Francisco - Oakland
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-23-2010, 08:51 AM
 
7 posts, read 26,979 times
Reputation: 13

Advertisements

I realize that most of this is personal preference, but I could use some external perspective... We are conflicted about where to live because there are so many choices.

About us...

1) We have 2 kids- 1 in 1st and 1 in kindergarten. Preference towards public schools, but could go private if necessary - tradeoff with home price.
2) We have older dogs - so they need at least a small outdoor fenced in area
3) I have an office in Redwood Shores and an office in South San Francisco, both that I need to show up at regularly. Can work from home occasionally. I'm comfortable with a commute - accustomed to 45 min to 1 hour, but could probably handle an hour and a half if necessary - would just time it right and do calls from car
4) Could technically buy a house up to 1.4m, but would be much more comfortable at 1.1 or below... flexible here from 700 to 1.4 ish.
5) Have home restoration experience- so could handle a fixer
6) Moved to SF because of the weather and year round gardening- so would like to avoid extreme fog or wind



Current thoughts:

1. Home in a neighborhood
a. Select areas in RWC
b. Select areas in San Mateo
c. San Carlos
d. Belmont
e. Palo Alto
f. Menlo Park
g. Mountain View
h. Burlingame

Pros: Commute, weather, Schools.
Cons: Size of house for money.


2. Home in a development
a. Hayward (Stonebrae)
b. Fremont (?)
c. Dublin (Sorrento)
d. Others (San Ramon, Pleasanton, etc.)

Pros: Size of house for money, access to pool, gym, social clubs, kids in area.
Cons: Commute, some schools aren't as good.


3. Anything else a little zanier - on the water somewhere?

I know this is really broad, but any thoughts? We are really having a difficult time. And of course, time is getting short because we want to be in before the school year, if possible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-23-2010, 09:13 AM
 
7 posts, read 26,979 times
Reputation: 13
And Thank you!!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2010, 02:20 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
6,820 posts, read 9,055,774 times
Reputation: 5183
I'm rather confused when I read your post. I really don't understand what you're looking for and what you're asking. Why are you feeling pressure to move out of SF? Is your work commute too long? Are you unhappy with schools that your kids are in right now? It's difficult to advise you when you haven't really explained what's going on. What's most important: schools, housing prices, commute time, etc? What are YOUR top choices right now? You're leaving out a lot of info in this call for help.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2010, 02:27 PM
 
Location: South Korea
5,242 posts, read 13,076,457 times
Reputation: 2958
Damn, if you can afford a house up to 1.4 million you should be able to live wherever you want! Most towns in the Peninsula, especially from Burlingame on south, are very nice and fairly upscale suburbs. Palo Alto and Cupertino might be the only places where you wouldn't be able to get as big a house for the money but you could probably find a nice place even there. It just depends on your commute and where you feel comfortable, most of these Peninsula suburbs are very similar.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2010, 07:34 PM
 
Location: Oakland, CA
527 posts, read 1,576,771 times
Reputation: 320
For somewhere a little less cookie-cutter, and on the water, I'd suggest Alameda. This one (http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/object/article?f=/c/a/2010/05/21/BU7B1DHAJE.DTL - broken link)'s outside of your price range at 1.6m, but there are lots of interesting-looking Tudor and Victorian type houses in Alameda and Oakland that may suit your fancy. You may also want to look into Piedmont.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2010, 10:23 PM
 
7 posts, read 26,979 times
Reputation: 13
Funny answers.

We are currently renting on the penninsula, now we need to move somewhere more permanent. I can't see buying a house that is under 2,000 square feet and spending over a mil. We need a house that is big enough for kids and dogs, still in commuting distance, and isn't too ridiculously priced.

Are Alameda and Piedmont in commuting distance of Redwood Shores? I'll take a look at those.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-24-2010, 03:36 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
6,820 posts, read 9,055,774 times
Reputation: 5183
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRT19355 View Post
Funny answers.
Why?? Are they unhelpful or just not what you expected??

Quote:
Originally Posted by JRT19355 View Post
Are Alameda and Piedmont in commuting distance of Redwood Shores? I'll take a look at those.
Looking at Google maps, it doesn't seem that Piedmont is a reasonable commute, but Alameda is doable. Looking at real estate, I came across this 4 BR, 3 BA, 3000 sq ft house that's very close to the water for only $878K. I'm coming across similar priced houses with much smaller lots on the peninsula.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-24-2010, 04:22 PM
 
Location: Oakland, CA
527 posts, read 1,576,771 times
Reputation: 320
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRT19355 View Post
Funny answers.

We are currently renting on the penninsula, now we need to move somewhere more permanent. I can't see buying a house that is under 2,000 square feet and spending over a mil. We need a house that is big enough for kids and dogs, still in commuting distance, and isn't too ridiculously priced.

Are Alameda and Piedmont in commuting distance of Redwood Shores? I'll take a look at those.
Piedmont would be a trek, but do-able, depending. I assumed some flexibility of commute hours based on your original post, but if you have to travel during peak time, it would be more difficult. However, I travel from Oakland to the Peninsula (Belmont) every day, and have coworkers who travel from Berkeley, Alameda, and other East Bay locations (even Clayton, but I don't know how long she'll be able to keep that up). My commute is 45 - 50 minutes during rush hour, 30-35 with no traffic, via Bay Bridge.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Francisco - Oakland
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:31 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top