Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Are you a creationbot, or what? Or just a plain idiot?
Field trip. Well?
I think it's a valid question. You appear to be accepting it without validation.
As for field trip? As I mentioned...I am in school until December...so no traveling before then. We live a ways away from each other, but I wouldn't rule out meeting if I got to Kentucky. I am applying for jobs in Kentucky, so it's possible.
I think it's a valid question. You appear to be accepting it without validation.
As for field trip? As I mentioned...I am in school until December...so no traveling before then. We live a ways away from each other, but I wouldn't rule out meeting if I got to Kentucky. I am applying for jobs in Kentucky, so it's possible.
If you are in school, then by all means go too the friggin library and look up that paper and then, guess what? You too will know how they dated that fossil. And take a science class whil you are at it. Got it?
By the way, I am a geologist. I don't need to validate someone else's work. That's their job.
From what I understand, it's a lot less than 160 million years.
Yes, carbon dating is, but that is one of the examples of what entails Science. Now when you say carbon dating can't be used for something that far back, how exactly do you know that? Is it Science telling/showing you that?
Yes, carbon dating is, but that is one of the examples of what entails Science. Now when you say carbon dating can't be used for something that far back, how exactly do you know that? Is it Science telling/showing you that?
Does science tell us that? From what I know of it, yes--it does tell us that it isn't valid that far back. But then, I question how scientific it was to suggest that the fossil was 160 million years old if we don't really know.
Does science tell us that? From what I know of it, yes--it does tell us that it isn't valid that far back. But then, I question how scientific it was to suggest that the fossil was 160 million years old if we don't really know.
We do know. And you would too if only you had a real education.
Do you honestly believe that repeatedly asking that question after it has been answered makes you look smart?
I'm curious why you believe it.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
