U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-08-2012, 11:16 AM
 
Location: Israel
165 posts, read 193,868 times
Reputation: 75

Advertisements

Going back to the Einstein’s question.
#
In his Miracle 1905 Einstein wrote the Fourth paper:
“ On the Electrodynamics of moving Bodies.” ( SRT).
And as a postscript to his forth, the Fifth paper:
“ Does the inertia of a body depend upon its energy content?”
As he realized the answer was:
“ Yes, it depends on its energy E= Mc^2.”
It means what SRT must be connected with E= Mc^2 .
It means what must be connection between Lorentz’s
transformation and E= Mc^2.
#.
The same Einstein’s question in a little detail interpretation:
“Does the inertia of a body ( for example: of a light quanta
or of an electron) depend upon its energy content E=Mc^2 ?”
Thinking logically, the answer must be : Yes, it depends.”
When new question arise: ” How is possible to understand the
connection between E=Mc^2 and E=ht or E= kb or E= h*w. ?”
On my opinion " The Law of Conservation and Transformation
of Energy/ Mass" (according to one single light quanta /electron )
gives answer to this question..
The problem is that now nobody wants to ask yourself that
„The Law of Conservation and Transformation of Energy/ Mass"
means according to one single light quanta / photon /electron.
============== . .
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik. Socratus.
===..
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-08-2012, 11:28 AM
 
15,921 posts, read 19,300,736 times
Reputation: 7675
I see Mr copy and paste is back with us....
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2012, 09:39 PM
 
Location: Israel
165 posts, read 193,868 times
Reputation: 75
I want to say that not Galileo and not Newton explained the cause of inertia.
It was Einstein who explained the reason of inertia:
He said that the inertia depends on its energy E= Mc^2.
===.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2012, 03:00 AM
 
Location: Israel
165 posts, read 193,868 times
Reputation: 75
More precise definition.

' Does the inertia of a body depend upon its energy content? '
/ Einstein. 27.09.1905. /
What is the formula of this energy content?
The formula is : E=Mc^2
Does the inertia of a body depend upon its E=Mc^2 ?
/ 09.04.2012. /
===.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2012, 03:07 AM
 
3 posts, read 32,304 times
Reputation: 12
hard to understand...
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2012, 03:23 AM
 
Location: Israel
165 posts, read 193,868 times
Reputation: 75
Where does strange E= Mc^2 come from?
1
In 1905 Einstein asked:
“ Does the inertia of a body depend upon its energy content?”
As he realized the answer was:
“ Yes, it depends on its energy content E= Mc^2 ”

It means that E= Mc^2 has some connection with inertia but
nobody explains this interaction.
2.
In 1928 Dirac said that E= Mc^2 comes from vacuum
and can be as positive as negative too.
3 -
Sometimes E= Mc^2 can be ‘rest’ and sometimes
can be ‘active’ and can destroy cities like
Hiroshima and Nagasaki
Why E= Mc^2 is so strange ?
Nobody gives answer
===.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2012, 03:27 AM
 
Location: Israel
165 posts, read 193,868 times
Reputation: 75
Where does strange E= Mc^2 come from?
1.
In 1905 Einstein asked:
“ Does the inertia of a body depend upon its energy content?”
As he realized the answer was:
“ Yes, it depends on its energy content E= Mc^2 ”
It means that E= Mc^2 has some connection with inertia but
nobody explains this interaction.
2.
In 1928 Dirac said that E= Mc^2 comes from vacuum
and can be as positive as negative too.
3 .
Sometimes E= Mc^2 can be ‘rest’ and sometimes
can be ‘active’ and can destroy cities like
Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Why E= Mc^2 is so strange ?
Nobody gives answer.
=======================.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2012, 09:09 AM
 
7,373 posts, read 14,067,399 times
Reputation: 7029
lol
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2012, 09:20 AM
 
2,182 posts, read 5,173,447 times
Reputation: 1209
He almost seems like a bot.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2022, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top