U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Covid-19 Information Page
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-21-2012, 08:34 AM
 
Location: Israel
165 posts, read 183,123 times
Reputation: 75

Advertisements

From 1905 the SRT doesn’t give sleep.
1.
One postulate of SRT takes vacuum as reference frame.
Another postulate of SRT takes inertial reference frame (s).
Can we say what these two (2) reference frames are equal ?
No, they aren’t equal.
Why ?
Because all inertial reference frames are relative.
And vacuum as reference frame isn’t relative,
it is motionless, fixed reference frame.
/ Michelson - Morley experiment. /
2.
In one reference frame speed of ‘Electrodynamics Bodies’ is constant.
In another reference frame speed of ‘Electrodynamics Bodies’ is relative.
3
And the Lorentz transformations explain interaction between
these two postulates.
==.
P.S.
"Einstein's special theory of relativity is based on two postulates:
One is the relativity of motion, and the second is the constancy
and universality of the speed of light.
Could the first postulate be true and the other false?
If that was not possible, Einstein would not have had to make two
postulates. But I don't think many people realized until recently
that you could have a consistent theory in which you changed only
the second postulate."
/ Lee Smolin, The Trouble With Physics, p. 226.
First published in 2006. /

===.
Socratus
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-21-2012, 01:21 PM
 
15,922 posts, read 17,876,432 times
Reputation: 7647
Yeah, I don't get much sleep with my SRT either....



\ Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I’m not sure about the former \

===.
plwhit

Last edited by plwhit; 04-21-2012 at 01:30 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2012, 01:55 PM
 
15,922 posts, read 17,876,432 times
Reputation: 7647
Quote:
Originally Posted by s0cratus View Post
From 1905 the SRT doesn’t give sleep.
1.
One postulate of SRT takes vacuum as reference frame.
Another postulate of SRT takes inertial reference frame (s).
Can we say what these two (2) reference frames are equal ?
No, they aren’t equal.
Why ?
Because all inertial reference frames are relative.
And vacuum as reference frame isn’t relative,
it is motionless, fixed reference frame.
/ Michelson - Morley experiment. /
2.
In one reference frame speed of ‘Electrodynamics Bodies’ is constant.
In another reference frame speed of ‘Electrodynamics Bodies’ is relative.
3
And the Lorentz transformations explain interaction between
these two postulates.
==.
P.S.
"Einstein's special theory of relativity is based on two postulates:
One is the relativity of motion, and the second is the constancy
and universality of the speed of light.
Could the first postulate be true and the other false?
If that was not possible, Einstein would not have had to make two
postulates. But I don't think many people realized until recently
that you could have a consistent theory in which you changed only
the second postulate."
/ Lee Smolin, The Trouble With Physics, p. 226.
First published in 2006. /

===.
Socratus
I don't understand why you keep on posting snippets out of a book which your profile (socratus's profile | guardian.co.uk) and web page (The Book "Religion and Physics". XXI C. Occurrence of life on the Earth.) has already documented....

Why not just save the bandwidth, post the above mentioned web site and be done with it s0cratus AKA Socratus AKA
Israel Sadovnik????



===.
plwhit

Last edited by plwhit; 04-21-2012 at 02:14 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2012, 02:25 PM
 
Location: Israel
165 posts, read 183,123 times
Reputation: 75
Hans J. Zweig, With a PhD from Stanford, a masters degree
from Brown and a B.A. from University of Rochester:
#
Newtonian physics is not the ultimate truth about the universe,

but neither is Einstein's Relativity. Newton did not know, or anticipate,
an upper bound to motion. Einstein cannot simply have it that all motion
is relative and at the same time that there is a unique hard upper limit, c.

Einstein’s Special Relativity Theory (SRT) attempts to solve the problem,

but it is invalid, as can be shown using several distinct approaches:
(1) through a logical analysis of the important concepts and
thought experiments,
(2) through recently available empirical results in astronomy, and
(3) through a physical/ mathematical analysis of the foundation of SRT.
. . . . . . . . . . . .

The ultimate truth is still hidden from us but is somewhere

between these extremes.

http://www.aquestionoftime.com/intro.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-22-2012, 09:45 PM
 
Location: Israel
165 posts, read 183,123 times
Reputation: 75
One postulate says:
In vacuum the speed of quantum of light is constant.
It is correct that ‘a vacuum doesn't have a measurable
rest frame’. Why?
Because in vacuum the speed of quantum of light is maximum
and time is stopped, become infinite, unlimited. It means that the
reference frame of vacuum is also infinite, unlimited.
And infinity we cannot measure.
But this doesn’t mean that infinite vacuum doesn’t exist.
We have theories ( thermodynamics and quantum physics) which
explain us the parameters of infinite vacuum.
#
If we measure the speed of quantum of light in vacuum from
different inertial frames the result will be the *same* - constant.
Why?
Because all different inertial frames ( stars and planets of billions
and billions galaxies ) exist in infinite motionless, stationary,
fixed (rest) reference frame of Vacuum.
Socratus

===
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2020, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top