Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-26-2012, 09:10 PM
 
Location: Sinking in the Great Salt Lake
13,138 posts, read 22,804,086 times
Reputation: 14116

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude View Post
Discovered by who? Locals knew all about the mountain gorilla and had hunted it for food for centuries. Robert von Beringe no more actually "discovered" the mountain gorilla than Columbus "discovered" America.
Native Americans thought was Sasquatch as real as any other animal in the woods too.

Still, this is pseudoscience... it does NOT prove Sasquatch is really out there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-26-2012, 09:16 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,070,698 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Army Soldier View Post
That's your opinion.
Objective historical fact is not opinion, and more importantly is not altered by blinked cultural chauvinism. A claim cannot be made that something was "discovered in 1902" when it was never lost in the first place.

The indigenous Africans knew all about the mountain gorilla and would have gladly shown them to anybody who asked.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Army Soldier
Anybody Never the less, there are always new species of animals being discovered all the time and documented. For instance the coelacanth that was thought extinct for 65 million years. The first live one was caught in 1997.
The first live coelacanth known to the west was caught in 1938, not 1997. They also spend their days at depths of 100–500 meters, where in case you have not noticed there are no people. This has not been true of the Pacific Northwest for tens of thousands of years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2012, 09:22 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,070,698 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chango View Post
Native Americans thought was Sasquatch as real as any other animal in the woods too.
Considering that the word "sasquatch" was not even invented until the 1920s (and by a white Canadian school teacher named J.W. Burns) that's a pretty tough assertion to actually back up. But let's not forget that almost every culture on the planet has "wild man" myths.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2012, 09:24 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,070,698 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Army Soldier View Post
Why do you want to bet?
To demonstrate my confidence.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2012, 09:28 PM
 
1,523 posts, read 1,437,532 times
Reputation: 356
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude View Post
Objective historical fact is not opinion, and more importantly is not altered by blinked cultural chauvinism. A claim cannot be made that something was "discovered in 1902" when it was never lost in the first place.

The indigenous Africans knew all about the mountain gorilla and would have gladly shown them to anybody who asked.


The first live coelacanth known to the west was caught in 1938, not 1997. .
You're right. I misread the article. The one caught in 97 was a second species.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2012, 09:29 PM
 
1,523 posts, read 1,437,532 times
Reputation: 356
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude View Post
To demonstrate my confidence.
LOL....I'm sure you do!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2012, 09:32 PM
 
21,026 posts, read 22,142,009 times
Reputation: 5941
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Army Soldier View Post
I hope this is the right forum to post this. This is a subject I have always been interested in and it seems scientist have confirmed that through a hair sample found where a sighting took place 5 years ago, that Bigfoot is indeed a offshoot species. I always thought the Patterson film Bigfoot from 1967 was the real deal.

DNA Diagnostics, Inc. - Genetics, Forensics, Paternity, Human DNA Testing, & Animal DNA Testing

Dallas November 24, 2012

A team of scientists can verify that their 5-year long DNA study, currently under peer-review, confirms the existence of a novel hominin hybrid species, commonly called “Bigfoot” or “Sasquatch,” living in North America. Researchers’ extensive DNA sequencing suggests that the legendary Sasquatch is a human relative that arose approximately 15,000 years ago as a hybrid cross of modern Homo sapiens with an unknown primate species.


“Our study has sequenced 20 whole mitochondrial genomes and utilized next generation sequencing to obtain 3 whole nuclear genomes from purported Sasquatch samples. The genome sequencing shows that Sasquatch mtDNA is identical to modern Homo sapiens, but Sasquatch nuDNA is a novel, unknown hominin related to Homo sapiens and other primate species. Our data indicate that the North American Sasquatch is a hybrid species, the result of males of an unknown hominin species crossing with female Homo sapiens.
""" from purported Sasquatch samples"....oooops, it's over.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2012, 09:41 PM
 
9,408 posts, read 11,926,044 times
Reputation: 12440
They claim the hair sample was from a sasquatch. Ok, where is this said sasquatch then? Oh, they don't have it, and there is no body. But they know it came from a sasquatch how..? So right off the bat their claim is dubious at best.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2012, 09:49 PM
 
Location: Pa
42,763 posts, read 52,838,486 times
Reputation: 25362
They could only be able to see that the dna is from something they haven seen yet .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2012, 09:54 PM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
52,708 posts, read 34,525,339 times
Reputation: 29284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Who?Me?! View Post
""" from purported Sasquatch samples"....oooops, it's over.
well of course it's purported.

the fact that you think it's all over on the basis of that single word demonstrates your intellectual level for all to observe.

Last edited by CaseyB; 11-27-2012 at 05:34 AM.. Reason: off topic
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:47 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top