Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Washington > Seattle area
 [Register]
Seattle area Seattle and King County Suburbs
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-11-2017, 01:11 PM
 
1 posts, read 632 times
Reputation: 10

Advertisements

I have a question: my trees are on the north property line (trunks on my side of the line), and these fur trees extend their branches over onto the neighbors side as well as mine. We agreed to have them wind sailed and split the cost. I wanted to cut them down as did the husband, however our wives wanted to keep them. I said that I’d be happy to keep them but beware that if branches or damage from the falling branches is on you, not me because I’d rather take them down. Well the husband is not got a real bad attitude as he has suffered damages to his roof etc… He gave me a letter to get one of the hanging branches down which I did. The branches that he had on his roof are now laying between our properties. Who’s responsibility is it to get rid of them? I had thought that if it falls on your property, you are responsible for it. Is that right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-11-2017, 01:36 PM
 
672 posts, read 443,446 times
Reputation: 1484
Be a good neighbor?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2017, 08:43 PM
 
Location: East of Seattle since 1992, 615' Elevation, Zone 8b - originally from SF Bay Area
44,585 posts, read 81,243,006 times
Reputation: 57825
Very common issue around here, we have had several of these incidents in our neighborhood recently. Any damage is the responsibility of the victim’s insurance, unless they can prove negligence on the part of the tree owner. I would tread lightly, because regardless of the wives wanting to keep the trees, your comments (disclaimer) will definitely indicate that you were aware of a problem. Unless the people that thinned them were certified arborist sand declared them to be safe in writing, the neighbor’s insurance can sue you. My suggestion is to volunteer to do anything you can to help them clean up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Washington > Seattle area
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:10 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top