Everyone should see: (Columbia: how much, to buy, pharmacy)

[Chance and Change]

How Ebola Was Discovered

Microbiologist Peter Piot brought Ebola to the world's attention nearly four decades ago. With rarely seen footage from his visit to Zaire in 1976, he describes how his team solved the mystery of the virus.

I wonder if many remember the story: "The Constant Gardner". which as made into a movie.

For Decades, Big Pharmacy has been going to Poor Countries and testing out their drugs on the people who they know cannot successfully file a lawsuit for the damages being done to the population. There are many culprits in these "testing game"; Big players are Big Pharmacy from some of Nordic Regional Nations, European Nations have been big payers in doing this type of thing to people, for many many decades.

maybe when people wake up and stand up and call out this process, we won't be faced with these "man created spreads of diseases".

[Chance and Change]

Remember recently: Mystery Illness Affecting Girls in Columbia

__________________________________________________ _____________________________________
Often many of these poorer countries are less of a challenge when it comes to Loss Mitigation % for Big Pharmacy. Big Pharmacy potentially already factored in what the cost will range if somone by chance challenge them and win in the discorvery of the negative effects of these administered drugs.
In the meantime people sometimes may be damaged, communities damaged, and in some cases whole countries. __________________________________________________ ____________________________________

We may want to become wiser in regard to what actually happens in the open spectrum of the world, with regards to the acts and actions of Big Industry.

Never can we afford to buy into the Spin of the News Media's Chatter. They pander to whom ever will pay commercial fees to have their items or POV (point of view) promoted. We havea lacking in the nature of truer Journalism. We have mouthpieces who peddle influence from one spectrum or the other; dependent on who's quickest with the checkbook, based on who is willing to pay to promote their propoganda.

Investigative Reporting has been attacked and assualted by every means legally possible to handcuff and gag these true research journalist who dig into the layers beyond the propoganda machines spin.

This issue of Ebola and the Origins.
When we think as a people, how much 100's of millions we send around the world to try and combat these plagues. We must wonder why are we not doing more to challenge the big pharmacy who is at the root of some of these issues which evolve into plagues and spread like wildfire. As a nation, we can't rule out our own Big Pharmacy and their roles in the "Testing Games", We must challge them as well.

We take it lighting with a high level of apathy, when we hear discussions about 'genetically modified elements", which are being put in food, and other things we utilize and consume. We blindly accept this, often without much self interest to research as best we can.

We saw the McDonalds and the Pink Slime, We recently saw even the Toothpaste, having to make plans to take the small beads out of toothpaste.
We are BOMBARDED with promotions of Medicine Advertisement, yet we are not doctors, nor do we prescribe, nor can we obtain these medicines without prescriptions. Then why are they being promoted to the public? It shows people smiling and laughing and living some 'fantasy existence", then comes the 3 minute long list of 'negative side" effects. Is'nt it the Doctors Job to know how to identify conditions and what compounds are effective to treat them.
(does it really take high promotion of TV Advertised Medicines, for us to get proper care and treatment).
In a faux method the advertisements as asking us in a covert manner to 'self prescribe" by pratically requesting these products via doctors prescription"). so if it is a danger, whom does the liability fall upon, if we are suggesed to ask for this stuff???)

Question: When does a medicine which has negative side effects, (which is prescribed for a prolonged period), avoid those side effects from becoming full blown conditions? [These are things we don't know]. Our position should be to "inquire". Often times we are told, that the benefits out-weigh the side effects. (we may want to have some input into this decision being made in "some" instance.)

Read- Learn and Understand what is being given, that you may better understand what you may expect as to actions, reaction and conditional improvements. As well as what are the risk associated and can your body and mind withstand the challenges. Then, questions what are the options available and how do they rate and rank.

This will help the individual get somewhat past some of the "high promotion programming" some Big Pharmacy is engaged.
But more importantly: It's not just about your doctor getting to know you. Make it your RESPONSIBILITY to get to know your doctor. IF your doctor is hesitant to address your concerns and provide you information so you can make an informed decisions. It may well be a direct signal to get a "second opinion" from a medical professional who does acknowledge and address your concerns.

Apathy will not benefit you, as you get only one life, make it a concern to get information, seek knowledge and invest in pursuit of understanding as best you can. That you may make somewhat more informed and wise decisions.

Value The Life You Have and Value The Lives of Others. - When people make inquiry, it cause the system to either yield information, or they go into collusive confusions. Either way, you will get to weed out the crooked and seek out those who embrace ethics and integrity within the respective profession.