Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I like the way the OP started with he/she/it needed visual proof man landed on the moon and when that was presented went off on a tangent about acceptable radiation levels and tough questions had to be answered.
The only tough question that has to be answered IMO is why the OP thinks radiation is something that has to be discussed yet again.
I realize that the OP will have to do some more research into this but...
T&S, you think you should open a different thread on the hazards of radiation now that you have been provided with visual proof of the remnants of the moon buggy and other lunar garbage on the surface of the moon?
Do more research and get answers to those hard questions T&S but post your results in a thread more appropriate to the discussion...
T&S, you think you should open a different thread on the hazards of radiation now that you have been provided with visual proof of the remnants of the moon buggy and other lunar garbage on the surface of the moon?
I have not been shown proof...what I have been shown is dots on the moon...
Viewing dots in the moon is not proof of anything...they look like giant grain granuals...
But for goodwill, I've decided to let that be for now, and explore other factors that would effect the provability of long term space flight...and radiation is a valid concern...
For one...I learned where long term effects of radion (as little as two weeks exposer in space) begins to change your chromosomes....
In other words you could leave as a human, and return as jabba the hut...
Which could very well explain various alien siteings...
they could be astronauts who were over exposed to radiation, and their dna physically changed them...
A poll almost three days old and it's still at 100%.
The OP just doesn't understand that after close to 60 posts in the thread he/she/it started everybody thinks he/she/it is a hopeless lost cause.
Path of this thread:
1. wants absolute incontrovertible proof mankind landed on the moon
-hijack-
2. claims Van Allen radiation belt is deadly
-hijack-
3. how did tires fit inside of rover?
-hijack-
4. how did the rover kick up moon dust?
-hijack-
5. Russia had the means but they never landed humans on the moon, why?
-hijack-
6. claims humans can't have babies in outer space (if they do they will look like Jabba the Hut)
-hijack-
7. area 51 conveying symbolic message?
This is fun! I love to see the depths of people's paranoia, keep it up T&S
If you're trying to impress everyone with your investigative intelligence you can start by letting this ridiculous thread die....
So, Time and Space, are you prepared to concede that a fast passage through the Van Allen belts can be done safely?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Time and Space
Why are you on my back??
I'm trying to take us all on a learning lesson here....
Part of learning is asking questions, and you react like you are being persecuted because someone dare ask a reasonable and valid question. Why such a reaction, is the question too hard, do you have no answer, so you view it as an attack or persecution?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
